Richy-2011
Active Member
wrong ,an ashcroft lt77 box is 445 quids and a clutch is at most 60 quids.
Were is that clutch from for £60 ****part a valeo oem is about £100
Were is that clutch from for £60 ****part a valeo oem is about £100
a2dds
Active Member
1 gear wonder lol....
fit ashcroft R380 200 tdi conversion box,that will do 250.000k easy
My LT77 is on about 175k according to the tachometer, probably only good for 180k knowing my luck haha
There is nought wrong with the LT77, its not the smoothest of boxes but it'll do
DEFENDER90-DAZ
New Member
Yep
They are all 600's - so light and very quick
The black one is more of a sports tourer but the other two.................
0-60 in just over 3 seconds
80mph at the red line in first gear
a2dds
Active Member
Yep
They are all 600's - so light and very quick
The black one is more of a sports tourer but the other two.................
0-60 in just over 3 seconds
80mph at the red line in first gear
Thats maaad, crazy acceleration. Bit of a contrast owning a landy and those nippy little things, its like the exact opposite!
DEFENDER90-DAZ
New Member
Yep you don't tend to get pulled for speeding in the landy
timtheenchanteruk
Well-Known Member
wrong ,an ashcroft lt77 box is 445 quids and a clutch is at most 60 quids.
Lt77 mebbe, I just looked up my box, R380, first one came up was 999.85 or summat for a recon.
and my clutch, even on your site is £80, like the one I just fitted (cept mine was a branded one, they want £150 fer that in yer link).
The Ferkin BoB
Banned
The Ferkin BoB
Banned
if yer do give em the keys and say you try....Yep you don't tend to get pulled for speeding in the landy
I spent 40 years driving lorries/wagons/trucks call em what you will.
the gearboxes without syncromesh with straight cut gears were a doddle to change without the clutch, the helical geared boxes with no syncromesh were a little less forgiving and German ZF boxes were very difficult to degotiate without practice, I think it was the cut of the gears or maybe they had more teeth per cog, it felt like it any way.
Later on with the introduction of syncromesh boxes on HGVs it became difficult to change without the clutch as the gears had to be forced past the syncro rings to engage.
So if you have worn syncromesh on yer gearbox its easy but if the box is in good nick then it will be more difficult
I wouldn't do it without the clutch for too long as I feel that this would wear the selectors and syncromesh
just my oppinion, I'm sure some smartarse will tell me that I'm talking bollocks
the gearboxes without syncromesh with straight cut gears were a doddle to change without the clutch, the helical geared boxes with no syncromesh were a little less forgiving and German ZF boxes were very difficult to degotiate without practice, I think it was the cut of the gears or maybe they had more teeth per cog, it felt like it any way.
Later on with the introduction of syncromesh boxes on HGVs it became difficult to change without the clutch as the gears had to be forced past the syncro rings to engage.
So if you have worn syncromesh on yer gearbox its easy but if the box is in good nick then it will be more difficult
I wouldn't do it without the clutch for too long as I feel that this would wear the selectors and syncromesh
just my oppinion, I'm sure some smartarse will tell me that I'm talking bollocks
Soloby Rob
Banned
I spent 40 years driving lorries/wagons/trucks call em what you will.
the gearboxes without syncromesh with straight cut gears were a doddle to change without the clutch, the helical geared boxes with no syncromesh were a little less forgiving and German ZF boxes were very difficult to degotiate without practice, I think it was the cut of the gears or maybe they had more teeth per cog, it felt like it any way.
Later on with the introduction of syncromesh boxes on HGVs it became difficult to change without the clutch as the gears had to be forced past the syncro rings to engage.
So if you have worn syncromesh on yer gearbox its easy but if the box is in good nick then it will be more difficult
I wouldn't do it without the clutch for too long as I feel that this would wear the selectors and syncromesh
just my oppinion, I'm sure some smartarse will tell me that I'm talking bollocks
Can some smart arse tell me what the hell is wrong with using the clutch to change gear, are you saying you do not use the brakes to slow down too??
The Ferkin BoB
Banned
I spent 40 years driving lorries/wagons/trucks call em what you will.
the gearboxes without syncromesh with straight cut gears were a doddle to change without the clutch, the helical geared boxes with no syncromesh were a little less forgiving and German ZF boxes were very difficult to degotiate without practice, I think it was the cut of the gears or maybe they had more teeth per cog, it felt like it any way.
Later on with the introduction of syncromesh boxes on HGVs it became difficult to change without the clutch as the gears had to be forced past the syncro rings to engage.
So if you have worn syncromesh on yer gearbox its easy but if the box is in good nick then it will be more difficult
I wouldn't do it without the clutch for too long as I feel that this would wear the selectors and syncromesh
just my oppinion, I'm sure some smartarse will tell me that I'm talking bollocks
dont forget its a LT77 box lol....
Brakes!!! what brakes
dont forget its a LT77 box lol....
Nowt wrong with them, got one for my V8 kitcar
jamesmartin
Well-Known Member
and whats wrong with that ?dont forget its a LT77 box lol....
a2dds
Active Member
Just use the gears
so there is now no need for a clutch or breaks One pedal wonder!
Soloby Rob
Banned
Just use the gears
So how do you make it accelerate just using one pedal, you wonder.
3.5 efi
Well-Known Member
nathan5346
Well-Known Member
You cud get an auto if you cant be arsed to use the clutch
