Ploughman
Member
- Posts
- 29
- Location
- 8°43' E - 52°1' N
Hi there!
Still fighting Td5 - currently with crankshaft sensor issues. Posted 10AS issues some days ago but at the moment this is actually not that relevant.
Although topics regarding crank shaft position CKP adjustment have been debated that often I just wanted to post what I discovered.
With the knowledge how the ECU determines not only TDC (top dead center) in general but also especially distinguishes between injection TDC and changeover TDC and this way worn flywheel can cause massive engine problems I replaced the original fitted dual mass flywheel some days ago against a brand new one. The spring assembly inside of old one seemed to be entirely worn or crushed (hard stop and creaky noise inside clearly felt; as well as brown powder spread on inner recessed surface). The make is Valeo for both old and new one.
After having everything reassembled to my astonishment the engine did not start at all.
Fitted a another CKP which I had fortunately “on stock”.
Engine starts but I had the feeling that I had to crank a bit longer than I remember I did before the repair. Engine idles and runs quite proper but when it is at operating temperature the rougher it runs (idles again like a bag of nuts… or spanners… or what ever).
Plugging a Hawkeye tester (I’ve also a PC-based Faultmate MSV-2; this is in Cyprus at the moment to have it “repaired” once again) I discovered the fault message “High speed crank synch loss logged”.
Then fitted a thin copper washer of 1 mm (as I do not have the NSJ000010 shim) under both CKPs.
Result: Engine starts with above mentioned delay only on that CKP I fetched from stock (NO start possible also on previous mounted one). Message still remains.
Though ohmic coil resistance it selves is not the only criteria for a well working CKP (as a coil and permanent magnet work together) I’ve measured both CKP’s just to make sure the old one is not at fault (winding interuption/short?) :
New one (engine starts with): 1212 Ohms
Prior fitted one (engine does not start with): 1335 Ohms
See photographs (genuine fitted one with label on)
Then put the old flywheel into a lathe, both CKP’s one by one fitted to tool holder with bracket and leads connected to oscilloscope: no significant difference in the oscillogram (distance set from sensor end to flywheel circumference to approx. 1,5 mm as it should be).
Is there anybody there who is well versed in CKP adjustment practice? Do flywheels and CKP have such tolerances? Do CKP olden with time?
Did I forget anything?
Slightly becoming desperate…
Thanks and regards,
Ploughman
Still fighting Td5 - currently with crankshaft sensor issues. Posted 10AS issues some days ago but at the moment this is actually not that relevant.
Although topics regarding crank shaft position CKP adjustment have been debated that often I just wanted to post what I discovered.
With the knowledge how the ECU determines not only TDC (top dead center) in general but also especially distinguishes between injection TDC and changeover TDC and this way worn flywheel can cause massive engine problems I replaced the original fitted dual mass flywheel some days ago against a brand new one. The spring assembly inside of old one seemed to be entirely worn or crushed (hard stop and creaky noise inside clearly felt; as well as brown powder spread on inner recessed surface). The make is Valeo for both old and new one.
After having everything reassembled to my astonishment the engine did not start at all.
Fitted a another CKP which I had fortunately “on stock”.
Engine starts but I had the feeling that I had to crank a bit longer than I remember I did before the repair. Engine idles and runs quite proper but when it is at operating temperature the rougher it runs (idles again like a bag of nuts… or spanners… or what ever).
Plugging a Hawkeye tester (I’ve also a PC-based Faultmate MSV-2; this is in Cyprus at the moment to have it “repaired” once again) I discovered the fault message “High speed crank synch loss logged”.
Then fitted a thin copper washer of 1 mm (as I do not have the NSJ000010 shim) under both CKPs.
Result: Engine starts with above mentioned delay only on that CKP I fetched from stock (NO start possible also on previous mounted one). Message still remains.
Though ohmic coil resistance it selves is not the only criteria for a well working CKP (as a coil and permanent magnet work together) I’ve measured both CKP’s just to make sure the old one is not at fault (winding interuption/short?) :
New one (engine starts with): 1212 Ohms
Prior fitted one (engine does not start with): 1335 Ohms
See photographs (genuine fitted one with label on)
Then put the old flywheel into a lathe, both CKP’s one by one fitted to tool holder with bracket and leads connected to oscilloscope: no significant difference in the oscillogram (distance set from sensor end to flywheel circumference to approx. 1,5 mm as it should be).
Is there anybody there who is well versed in CKP adjustment practice? Do flywheels and CKP have such tolerances? Do CKP olden with time?
Did I forget anything?
Slightly becoming desperate…
Thanks and regards,
Ploughman
Attachments
Last edited: