Range Rover Insurance.

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

fulmar/88

Member
Posts
14
Location
chichester
My 2002 P38 insured with Admiral from January to January, I pay about #360, I have just sold the P38 and have a L322 Vogue 2003 coming in June, they want a extra #180 for the remaining 7 months, seems a lot, I am 87, 3 other cars, no claims over 25 years.
 
I too am insured with Admiral. It pays to phone them and argue about the cost. They always end up dropping it. Well they have for us. We have our P38 2001 Vogue & Ford Focus Zetec insured.
All insurers try and take the P if they can get away with it.
 
I am also with Admiral, they were one of the few to not want a tracker on the L322. When I sold the C70 , I wasnt happy with the refund for the rest of the year and explained that I would happily cancel my insurance there and then if they didnt come up with better. Suddenly they were 'happy to forego the admin charge' forntaking the Volvo off the cover. Ended up with over double the original refund offer.
It pays to say 'Not good enough'.
 
Sadly your age counts against you, so the choice of insurers happy to cover you will be limited. If it's any consolation I have a number of elderly neighbours relying on their cars for independence (we live in a rural location) who are paying well in excess of your quotation for small mundane cars, never mind RR's & this despite living in a favourable (to insurance companies) post-code.
 
Last edited:
10 mins on the comparrison site and iv got full comp from 233 with lpg no extra and no problem with insurance company as declared as a modification current companies renewal 509 up a lot from last year i gave them a call had a chat no explanation of price increase even when i said there 150 cheaper on a comparrision site compared to there renewal girl said well just cancel auto renewal and do the new quote online then.........no sorry your taking the ****sssssss
 
My 2002 P38 insured with Admiral from January to January, I pay about #360, I have just sold the P38 and have a L322 Vogue 2003 coming in June, they want a extra #180 for the remaining 7 months, seems a lot, I am 87, 3 other cars, no claims over 25 years.
Good luck with your 2003 L322, my mate has just almost given away his 2003 L322 rust bucket with unreliable electronics. Should have stuck with the P38.
As far as insurance goes, I'm 75 and take a voluntary medical every 2 years which seems to stuff the insurance company when it comes to loading for age as many drivers 25 years younger than me are less fit.
 
Last edited:
Good luck with your 2003 L322, my mate has just almost given away his 2003 L322 rust bucket with unreliable electronics. Should have stuck with the P38. .

That's interesting, not the first time I've heard of later (ie post P38a) LR products being prone to corrosion o_O
 
That's interesting, not the first time I've heard of later (ie post P38a) LR products being prone to corrosion o_O
Zero Germans will do that to an automotive. Most German automotives from that age are equally rotten.
 
Most early l322s you see on the bay have rotten rear arches
That's just lack of maintenance. The Golden Girl is now 16yrs old and is booked in to get rear arches dealt with by body shop, because there is a couple of inches of corrosion showing. Admittedly it's the second time in my ownership she has gone in BUT if those 'rotten' ones had been looked after properly, they wouldn't be rotten.
I'm sure there are plenty of other 12-16yr old marques that also have rust/corrosion issues. I think part of the problem is people dont realise just how long ago the L322 was introduced, and are stuck in the 'new' style mindset. When they are actually old style now.

Addit: Just realised this is the oldest veh I have ever owned and have definitely had rust issues with previous marques. Had a 6yr old Merc that had to have wheel arches done. So don't think the L322 is overly corrosion loving.
 
That's just lack of maintenance. The Golden Girl is now 16yrs old and is booked in to get rear arches dealt with by body shop, because there is a couple of inches of corrosion showing. Admittedly it's the second time in my ownership she has gone in BUT if those 'rotten' ones had been looked after properly, they wouldn't be rotten.
I'm sure there are plenty of other 12-16yr old marques that also have rust/corrosion issues. I think part of the problem is people dont realise just how long ago the L322 was introduced, and are stuck in the 'new' style mindset. When they are actually old style now.

Addit: Just realised this is the oldest veh I have ever owned and have definitely had rust issues with previous marques. Had a 6yr old Merc that had to have wheel arches done. So don't think the L322 is overly corrosion loving.
You jest! My 18 year ol P38 has no rust and has needed no body work maintenance. It's not just the body that rusts, the brake pipes let go on my mates L322 during the MOT brake test.
 
I admit the L322 is not perfect and yes the brake pipes are a BIG issue, which is due to a design stupidity, but my comment was in response to
"biketeacherdave said:
Most early l322s you see on the bay have rotten rear arches
",
not brake pipes.
Just like every other vehicle on the road, some will end up rust buckets, some will not. There is where a vehicle spends most of it's life to take into consideration. Mine, sits almost in the sea, some, in the UK , are lucky to never go closer than the 70 miles , which we are supposedly never further from the sea. Yet others are lucky enough to live in a drier, warmer climate, even further from the sea. ;)
I still say too many are stuck in the mode of the L322 being a 'new ' RR , when it is not. There are also those who just love to hate, so will shout from rooftops how bad the L322 is. Once the L405 joins our merry band on LZ, with owners weeping at it's faults, there will be those who come out hating it too, because it's 'new' or because it's not a "insert model here".
Personally I like most LR products, from Series I to Velar, with the exception of the Evoque, and I'm just happy to see people trying to keep them on the road as they age. Even(especially) if they have to fight rust/ corrosion and all other issues, to do so. :)
'
 
I admit the L322 is not perfect and yes the brake pipes are a BIG issue, which is due to a design stupidity, but my comment was in response to
"biketeacherdave said:
Most early l322s you see on the bay have rotten rear arches
",
not brake pipes.
Just like every other vehicle on the road, some will end up rust buckets, some will not. There is where a vehicle spends most of it's life to take into consideration. Mine, sits almost in the sea, some, in the UK , are lucky to never go closer than the 70 miles , which we are supposedly never further from the sea. Yet others are lucky enough to live in a drier, warmer climate, even further from the sea. ;)
I still say too many are stuck in the mode of the L322 being a 'new ' RR , when it is not. There are also those who just love to hate, so will shout from rooftops how bad the L322 is. Once the L405 joins our merry band on LZ, with owners weeping at it's faults, there will be those who come out hating it too, because it's 'new' or because it's not a "insert model here".
Personally I like most LR products, from Series I to Velar, with the exception of the Evoque, and I'm just happy to see people trying to keep them on the road as they age. Even(especially) if they have to fight rust/ corrosion and all other issues, to do so. :)
'
"not perfect" is a bit of an understatement IMO judging by the problems on my mates one and others I have come across. I'd sooner have the Defender he has bought to replace it.
 
Back
Top