one for Martyn...

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:38:37 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> wrote:

>further to the military vehicle thing...
>
>
>http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270002187845


Absolute dog to drive, IMO the scorpion is quite good fun.

We have a client that was something high on the mod sourcing committee
and my boss talks to him about LRs etc. Apparently the LR failed to
complete the assessment as it broke down, the Pinz had no reliability
problems. So the selectors were treated to a "jolly" at the top of
some Austrian mountain, accessed by a zig zag road. At the end of the
"business lunch" the hosts declared the MOD contingent would be late
for their flight home, they were hurried out to a Pinz which proceeded
to descend the mountain by the direct route, it looks like this
descent may have clinched the deal.

AJH

 
"AJH" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> We have a client that was something high on the mod sourcing committee
> and my boss talks to him about LRs etc. Apparently the LR failed to
> complete the assessment as it broke down, the Pinz had no reliability
> problems. So the selectors were treated to a "jolly" at the top of
> some Austrian mountain, accessed by a zig zag road. At the end of the
> "business lunch" the hosts declared the MOD contingent would be late
> for their flight home, they were hurried out to a Pinz which proceeded
> to descend the mountain by the direct route, it looks like this
> descent may have clinched the deal.
>
> AJH
>


Complementary sick bags I presume ? ;-)

Lee D


 
Austin Shackles came up with the following;:
> further to the military vehicle thing...
>
>
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270002187845


Hoohoohoo ... bugger Martyn .... want, want, want ... ;)

I once (in about 1984 ish, got taken for a ride in one across a Tank Proving
Ground. An awesome experience, it just couldn't be stopped, it seemed.

And it'd certainly make a splash in the local RTV ... ;)


--
Paul ...
(8(|) Homer Rules ..... Doh !!!



 
In message <[email protected]>
AJH <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:38:37 +0100, Austin Shackles
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >further to the military vehicle thing...
> >
> >
> >http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270002187845

>
> Absolute dog to drive, IMO the scorpion is quite good fun.
>
> We have a client that was something high on the mod sourcing committee
> and my boss talks to him about LRs etc. Apparently the LR failed to
> complete the assessment as it broke down, the Pinz had no reliability
> problems. So the selectors were treated to a "jolly" at the top of
> some Austrian mountain, accessed by a zig zag road. At the end of the
> "business lunch" the hosts declared the MOD contingent would be late
> for their flight home, they were hurried out to a Pinz which proceeded
> to descend the mountain by the direct route, it looks like this
> descent may have clinched the deal.
>
> AJH
>


My understanding was the the Pinz's were bought as result of a
political deal tied in with a contract for LR ambulances.
Certainly, a Captain from the Royal Artillery was quoted, on
Newsnight I seem to remember, that the replacement of the 101's
was going to mean 50% more helipcopter lifts required to move
a gun battery, and could he have some more helicopters then?

It defiantely all came about because Paddy Ashdown stuck his
oar in in Parliament about 101 ambulances in Croatia/Serbia.

The test drivers a Chobbham didn't like the Pinz's at all,
- the trailer test I saw while waiting to get on the track
was, er, interesting.

Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
RISC-OS - Where have all the good guys gone?
Lib Dems - Townies keeping comedy alive
 
On 2006-06-29, beamendsltd <[email protected]> wrote:

> My understanding was the the Pinz's were bought as result of a
> political deal tied in with a contract for LR ambulances.


I'd read that the Pinzgauer ambulances were considered, but the MOD
doesn't see ambulances as requiring the kind of off-road capability
that a pinz can give relative to a long-wheelbase landy (127 I think).
Their reasoning was that you don't want the ambulance being chucked
around off-road too much because of all the gear on board, not to
mention the wounded! I think price was an issue too, but not sure how
much given that much of the cost is the equipment, custom work and
staff.

ISTR this being on a web page about landy ambulances, don't have the
URL to hand.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 
In message <[email protected]>
Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2006-06-29, beamendsltd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > My understanding was the the Pinz's were bought as result of a
> > political deal tied in with a contract for LR ambulances.

>
> I'd read that the Pinzgauer ambulances were considered, but the MOD
> doesn't see ambulances as requiring the kind of off-road capability
> that a pinz can give relative to a long-wheelbase landy (127 I think).
> Their reasoning was that you don't want the ambulance being chucked
> around off-road too much because of all the gear on board, not to
> mention the wounded! I think price was an issue too, but not sure how
> much given that much of the cost is the equipment, custom work and
> staff.
>
> ISTR this being on a web page about landy ambulances, don't have the
> URL to hand.
>


My point was that the deal was politically motivated, rather than
based on any technical/operational needs, or even cost. Someone,
other than the users, saw a political need for Britain to buy
Pinz's. Probably in exchange for a seat on some committee etc.

Richard
--
www.beamends-lrspares.co.uk [email protected]
RISC-OS - Where have all the good guys gone?
Lib Dems - Townies keeping comedy alive
 
On 2006-06-29, beamendsltd <[email protected]> wrote:

> My point was that the deal was politically motivated, rather than
> based on any technical/operational needs, or even cost.


Hmm, and there's me thinking the 101FC had reached the end of its
service and land rover had no replacement...

What would you suggest they do, replace the ageing 101s with transit
vans?

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 
Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> uttered summat worrerz funny about:

> Hmm, and there's me thinking the 101FC had reached the end of its
> service and land rover had no replacement...
>
> What would you suggest they do, replace the ageing 101s with transit
> vans?


What is actually wrong with the 101, all be it not the aging ones, but the
model it's self? Landrover could easliy have bunged the 200 and 30 Tdi's in
them and still been quicker than the Pinz.

Like other than the engine and box the 110 seems to offer little more than
the 109's. Ok suspension is different but in principle the vehicle offers
little more to the end users.

Nowt wrong with the V8 mind (for the 101) but the Military seem to have gone
down the line of a single fuel where they can.

The Llama appeared on the face of it to be ready to roll off the production
lines so Landrover could have pulled it off had the money been waved under
there noses, or so it seems to a casual observer.

Lee D


 
Lee_D wrote:
> Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> uttered summat worrerz funny about:
>
>> Hmm, and there's me thinking the 101FC had reached the end of its
>> service and land rover had no replacement...
>>
>> What would you suggest they do, replace the ageing 101s with transit
>> vans?

>
> What is actually wrong with the 101, all be it not the aging ones, but the
> model it's self?


Exactly, and what would have been wrong with incrementally upgrading
them as you say with the 200 or 300, then changing to portal axles -
thanks for showing me those. It would have cost us a lot less than the
new fleet.

Steve
 
Steve Taylor <[email protected]> uttered summat worrerz
funny about:

> Exactly, and what would have been wrong with incrementally upgrading
> them as you say with the 200 or 300, then changing to portal axles -
> thanks for showing me those. It would have cost us a lot less than the
> new fleet.
>
> Steve


You won't be wanting to scroll down this page then....

http://www.straightforwardsupplies.co.uk/acatalog/Portal_Axles.html

looking in to the page a bit further they may be able to roll your diff for
you though.

Lee


 
On 2006-06-29, Lee_D <[email protected]> wrote:

> You won't be wanting to scroll down this page then....


I'd toyed with the idea of keeping my 110 and adding portals and
lockers, it'd be a monster! About £2,000 for some C303 portals with
lockers already fitted, not that hard to attach either apparently.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 
On 2006-06-29, Lee_D <[email protected]> wrote:

> What is actually wrong with the 101, all be it not the aging ones,
> but the model it's self? Landrover could easliy have bunged the 200
> and 30 Tdi's in them and still been quicker than the Pinz.


Don't forget that the British army never used the gen 1 pinz, only the
gen 2, with disc brakes, power steering, more powerful engine etc.
Speed's not much of an issue for the army generally, you're not going
to do 90MPH towing an artillery piece. A gen 2 will do about 75/80MPH.

The 101 AIUI just wasn't developed by Land Rover, or the units they
did develop didn't make the grade (was it the Llama?). It seems they
gave up on the military market as the brand took off in the consumer
market.

> Like other than the engine and box the 110 seems to offer little
> more than the 109's. Ok suspension is different but in principle the
> vehicle offers little more to the end users.


Land rover have to keep up with regulations and rivals in the civilian
market, so their military kit has to follow suit. I don't agree that
the 110 is no improvement over the 109 either, especially for civvies.

> The Llama appeared on the face of it to be ready to roll off the
> production lines so Landrover could have pulled it off had the money
> been waved under there noses, or so it seems to a casual observer.


Depends on how serious they were I suppose, I don't think the Llama
was that far down the line before being taken out and shot, some
prototypes were made.

Plus of course the pinz really will leave a stock landy in the dust
when it comes to off-roading, so any re-clothing of a 110 in forward
control form wouldn't have made the grade against a 716 or 718. If
they were matched in price, the 716/8 would win, so it depends I
suppose on Land Rover's projected price of a new unproven vehicle
against one already in use and production.

The stupid thing is though, a landy with lockers and portals on it
could easily beat a 4x4 pinz, pinzgauer axle articulation even on the
newer models isn't that good, certainly less than a stock landy. It
wouldn't take much for Land Rover to have made a more extreme version
of the Defender that could keep up off-road. The pinz has the same
sized tyres as the landy so its 16 inches of ground clearance versus
my 110's 8 inches is down to the portals, the rest is down to the
lockers. You'd be amazed at the difference the clearance and lockers
makes though.

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 
Ian Rawlings <[email protected]> uttered summat worrerz funny about:
> On 2006-06-29, Lee_D <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> What is actually wrong with the 101, all be it not the aging ones,
>> but the model it's self? Landrover could easliy have bunged the 200
>> and 30 Tdi's in them and still been quicker than the Pinz.

>
> Don't forget that the British army never used the gen 1 pinz, only the
> gen 2, with disc brakes, power steering, more powerful engine etc.
> Speed's not much of an issue for the army generally, you're not going
> to do 90MPH towing an artillery piece. A gen 2 will do about
> 75/80MPH.
>
> The 101 AIUI just wasn't developed by Land Rover, or the units they
> did develop didn't make the grade (was it the Llama?). It seems they
> gave up on the military market as the brand took off in the consumer
> market.
>
>> Like other than the engine and box the 110 seems to offer little
>> more than the 109's. Ok suspension is different but in principle the
>> vehicle offers little more to the end users.

>
> Land rover have to keep up with regulations and rivals in the civilian
> market, so their military kit has to follow suit. I don't agree that
> the 110 is no improvement over the 109 either, especially for civvies.
>
>> The Llama appeared on the face of it to be ready to roll off the
>> production lines so Landrover could have pulled it off had the money
>> been waved under there noses, or so it seems to a casual observer.

>
> Depends on how serious they were I suppose, I don't think the Llama
> was that far down the line before being taken out and shot, some
> prototypes were made.
>
> Plus of course the pinz really will leave a stock landy in the dust
> when it comes to off-roading, so any re-clothing of a 110 in forward
> control form wouldn't have made the grade against a 716 or 718. If
> they were matched in price, the 716/8 would win, so it depends I
> suppose on Land Rover's projected price of a new unproven vehicle
> against one already in use and production.
>
> The stupid thing is though, a landy with lockers and portals on it
> could easily beat a 4x4 pinz, pinzgauer axle articulation even on the
> newer models isn't that good, certainly less than a stock landy. It
> wouldn't take much for Land Rover to have made a more extreme version
> of the Defender that could keep up off-road. The pinz has the same
> sized tyres as the landy so its 16 inches of ground clearance versus
> my 110's 8 inches is down to the portals, the rest is down to the
> lockers. You'd be amazed at the difference the clearance and lockers
> makes though.



Yeah...

<http://www.scorpionracing.co.uk/OFFROAD/html/Readers%20Rides/portalaxle.htm>

Whats the axle rating for these?

<evil grin>

Lee D


 
On 2006-06-29, Steve Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Only 846 quid for a pair of axles. Would they fit ?


404 axles have been fitted to landies, it's just a case of how to do it ;-)

Don't forget the price of the above axles is minus the disc brake
conversion, as well as all hardware to make it fit.

> Just imagine the clearance, and torque at the wheels, and built in lockers..


... just make sure you don't end up with 5 reverse gears and a top
speed of 30MPH! Even mine can go faster than that ;-)

--
Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire!
 
On or around Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:10:07 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
@"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:

>On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:38:37 +0100, Austin Shackles
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>further to the military vehicle thing...
>>
>>
>>http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270002187845

>
>I've more space in my S3!
>
>Plus I reckon it's a little heavyweight for me.


I thought you had yer eyes on a stolly?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Satisfying: Satisfy your inner child by eating ten tubes of Smarties
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.
 
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:46:34 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> wrote:

>>Plus I reckon it's a little heavyweight for me.

>
>I thought you had yer eyes on a stolly?


I could get a 101 in the loadbay of a Stolly.

Mind, may have my eye on one - doubt the boss'll ever let me get my
arse in one, though.


--
Coming quite soon:
http://www.ulrc.net
 
Back
Top