This is turning into something of a saga, as I said before the freelander was lame, really down on power, dead at 50mph and struggling on hills...
...At first I thought it might be MAF/Ronbox related, so I played with settings and ultimately removed the ronbox and went to a new, cheap, standard MAF*, cleared the codes and did a couple of test drives and ran the delphi fault code reader on it, came up with P1E30 turbo under performing. Then checked the hoses for visible damage, and I pressure tested the intercooler to 45psi. Ran it again, still the same, from previous work on the freelander I know the hard boost pipe is sound. At which point I reached out to the forum, and Andy gave me a couple of pointers, so acting on Andy's suggestions did a test drive with the delphi tool again, this time reading the MAP sensor in real time, and only ever seeing ~95-105kpa on the sensor, I thought it might be a duff sensor, so I took the manifold off, removed the MAP and found this:
Eeewww! Mega icky!! It appears that the 5% of sludge I didn't clean out of the manifold earlier this year had congregated around the MAP sensor:
So I cleaned the manifold again, this time a bit more thoroughly, cleaned the MAP sensor with WD40's brand of electrical contact cleaner, which has the straw nozzle, and jetted the fluid into the sensor and reassembled the motor, took it for another test drive, again watching manifold pressure, still showed the same range of pressures, ggrrrr!
So it was back to the workshop, manifold off again, hit t'interweb for more info on the sensor and discovered its max pressure is 250kpa = 2.5bar, so I fired up the compressor, regulated its output down to 2.4bar, and set up a test with the sensor plugged into the vehicle, the delphi laptop reading the MAP sensor, and a dust gun blower tool plugged into the regulated airline, silicone hose from the nozzle of the gun to the inlet port on the sensor, and injected it with 2.4 bar, and the laptop showed 237kpa.
So I then put the sensor back in the manifold, refitted it, put the pressure testing tool onto the elbow hose that joins the plastic ducting to the intercooler pipes, with the electronics still reading the map, I quickly pressured up the inlet manifold to 1.5bar on the tyre gage, seen 148kpa on the senor, so I'm now confident in the manifold / MAP sensor / intercooler / pipework, it just seems the turbo isn't even trying. So I went to visit the turbo...
My first port of call was to manually move the actuator and thus stroke the VNT bellcrank, stiff, but it moves, but I'm certain it's only stiff because of the spring in the actuator, rather than an internal problem with the slotted ring/nozzle fins, as when I released the force it quickly springs back to rest position. So I now wondered was it a duff actuator? To prove or disprove this, I removed the hose from the actuator to the solenoid, and put a hose from the actuator to a depressed 150ml syringe, pulling the plunger on the syringe back pulled the actuator back, which was looking promising as it indicated if the actuator sees vacuum it will stroke the VNT and spin up the turbo. I then removed the solenoid, and swapped it for another (used) one I had in stock, double-checked the hoses were connected to the correct ports and went for a test drive watching the MAP sensor, no boost. Time to interrogate the solenoid...
Came back, checked the wiring to the solenoid by putting multimeter probes in the plug and with the ignition on, engine off, I was getting seeing somewhere in the region of 8.5-9.0 volts which I read on another thread was about right. So I then checked the vacuum output by putting the vacuum out from the valve to an extended 150ml syringe, started the engine, and it was pathetic how slowly the plunger was pulled in. So I then took the vacuum supply from the valve to the plunger, still slow, ergo it's a vacuum supply problem. This might be somewhat of my own making , as I had repiped the vacuum hoses with 3mm silicon hose, and on the long run across the bulkhead replaced a section of the hose run with cunifer brake pipe cable-tied to the vacuum to servo pipe. Maybe this was causing a restriction? After doing that modification I had read it's meant to be 4mm vacuum hose, and I had ordered and since received 4mm silicon "vacuum hose", I parenthesized the words there as I think the hose is too thin-walled for this purpose, but it has a better cross-sectional area and it worked for the syringe to actuator test, however it will be replaced with better quality thicker sidewalled vacuum hose after the holidays. Time to play vacuum-pneumatics tech...
So first test to prove the engine's vacuum system was to take the 4mm hose and put it onto the vacuum reservoir on one end and the 150ml syringe at the other, start the engine, and low and behold the syringe plunger is pulled in at a rate speedy gonzales would be proud of. This proves the vacuum pump is working and pulling vacuum. So inspired by the "Underry Underry, Ariba Ariba!!" pump test result, I then removed the 3mm vacuum hose, replacing it with the new 4mm hose, and removed the cunifer brake pipe section, and made a replacement for it out of 6mm OD 4.5mm ID copper. But as it's copper, rather than cunifer, I was aware it would tarnish, so to protect it, and make it look OE, rather than botchee, I sleeved it in black electrical heat-shrink:
Then I connected it up with 4mm silicone, trimmed the cable ties and turned their buckles out of sight:
Pretty! And hopefully it performs much better than the 3mm silicone and 4.75mm brake pipe that it replaced¿ But it was at this point I stopped, calling it night at ~20:30 on Christmas Eve. So I killed the lights, locked the doors, came home, scrubbed up, set up the kids with a movie on their TV's, and their new Christmas pyjama's, and poured the first of the festive beers. Tomorrow, or whenever day it is that COVID/Christmas nonsense allows me back to the workshop, I will:
- put the 150ml syringe on a hose connected to that copper/heatshrink pipe, start the engine and ensure that the new pipe doesn't introduce any restrictions which will be indicated by the speed at which the plunger is drawn in
- set up the delphi laptop to read the MAP sensor, put the 150ml syringe onto a hose onto the actuator, and with the engine running extremely GENTLY pull the syringe, and thus the actuator, back and hopefully see an increase in MAP pressure reading as the actuator strokes the VNT bellcrank arm and thus the turbo is forced to spool up. I stress the word gently as I really don't want to get cackhanded and overspeed the turbocharger's internals. This could go one of two ways:
- If I see boost (increased MAP reading) as a result of directly applying vacuum to the actuator and thus moving the VNT arm, then I know the problem has to be connected to the solenoid
- If I don't see boost the problem is within the VNT mechanism and I might be looking at surgery on, or replacement of the turbocharger and the air will not be full of festive spirits blue expletives
- assuming I get boost from the syringe to actuator test, I'll then remove the current solenoid and fit the original one which I have tested on the bench using the syringe and a CB radio powersupply to generate vacuum and power on/off to toggle the valve and confirm which ports are connected
What a bloody saga this has turned into, chasing one ambiguous fault code associated with the freelander being a lame-duck has had me crawling all over the engine bay... I've been on the front of the engine bay with the intercooler and pipework, been on top of the engine with the manifold, I've been under/behind/right side of engine bay groping about with the vacuum stuff. *shaking my head*