FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - £1 NO Reserve

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:26:25 GMT, "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Funny how this is been sold now its been announced that the Gvt want them
>banned...........

Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???

Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them legal.
--

Regards

John [Harold Hill, Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 

"Steve" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Funny how this is been sold now its been announced that the Gvt want them
> banned...........

I think you're mistaking fact with the full-of-**** media's scaremongering.

Tariq


 
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC), Jim <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:25:45 +0100, JC
><johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote:
>
>>As it says in the title
>>
>>http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5713157070&ssPageName=ADME:B:LC:UK:1
>>
>>Happy Bidding
>
>Posted to uk.adverts.telecom.mobile ...
>
>Following the charter of this newsgroup - how's this Mobile Telecom
>related ?
>
>Jim


Ha, you hypocrite!!!!

I've just noticed that you replied to all of the groups I posted to..the
others being driving groups!!

Hope you get some snotty responses!
--

Regards

John [Harold Hill, Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 

"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:26:25 GMT, "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Funny how this is been sold now its been announced that the Gvt want them
> >banned...........
>
> Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???
>
> Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
> until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them
legal.

The banning of the carriage of detectors (that can tell if a camera is live)
wording is in the new road safety bill. It has not been before Parliament
yet.


 

"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

<SNIP>

Abuse has been reported. [email protected]

X-Complaints-To: [email protected] (please include full headers)
X-Trace: b0496a6052c16161e6725a207851420744776804675076870142e056410e7918
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:25:44 +0100


 
jpdal,.... u are a very sad person. what the f+++ have u reported and to
whom ?

does it compensate for that small penis ?




 

> Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???

The media over the last week or so. Dont want GPS ones banned, just the ones
that detect if RADAR is present in a camera or not.

> Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
> until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them
legal.

The have NEVER been banned cos they are a radar detecter per sey, only cos
they were said to intefere with a Radio signal. Was proved in the court case
that they didnt interfere with said radio signal and so legal to use. Radio
and telecomunications Act or something like that.




 
Steve wrote:
>>Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???
>
>
> The media over the last week or so. Dont want GPS ones banned, just the ones
> that detect if RADAR is present in a camera or not.
>
>
>>Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
>>until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them
>
> legal.
>
> The have NEVER been banned cos they are a radar detecter per sey, only cos
> they were said to intefere with a Radio signal. Was proved in the court case
> that they didnt interfere with said radio signal and so legal to use. Radio
> and telecomunications Act or something like that.
>

Erm, not quite, see:-

http://www.speedcheetah.co.uk/legal_ruling.htm

--
Ian Edwards

 

> > The have NEVER been banned cos they are a radar detecter per sey, only
cos
> > they were said to intefere with a Radio signal. Was proved in the court
case
> > that they didnt interfere with said radio signal and so legal to use.
Radio
> > and telecomunications Act or something like that.
> >
>
> Erm, not quite, see:-

Yep, I stand corrected but I was only making a very simplified comment on
legal jargon


 
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:26:25 GMT, "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Funny how this is been sold now its been announced that the Gvt want them
>banned...........

Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???

Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them legal.
--

Regards

John [Harold Hill, Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 

"Steve" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Funny how this is been sold now its been announced that the Gvt want them
> banned...........

I think you're mistaking fact with the full-of-**** media's scaremongering.

Tariq


 
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:14:08 +0000 (UTC), Jim <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:25:45 +0100, JC
><johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote:
>
>>As it says in the title
>>
>>http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5713157070&ssPageName=ADME:B:LC:UK:1
>>
>>Happy Bidding
>
>Posted to uk.adverts.telecom.mobile ...
>
>Following the charter of this newsgroup - how's this Mobile Telecom
>related ?
>
>Jim


Ha, you hypocrite!!!!

I've just noticed that you replied to all of the groups I posted to..the
others being driving groups!!

Hope you get some snotty responses!
--

Regards

John [Harold Hill, Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 

"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:26:25 GMT, "Steve" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Funny how this is been sold now its been announced that the Gvt want them
> >banned...........
>
> Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???
>
> Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
> until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them
legal.

The banning of the carriage of detectors (that can tell if a camera is live)
wording is in the new road safety bill. It has not been before Parliament
yet.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
FA SWB SHOGUN SPARES OR REPAIR?
Replies
0
Views
1K
Dave
D
J
FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - £1 NO Reserve - 3 days to go
Replies
16
Views
1K
Hirsty's
H
J
FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - Ends Tomorrow
Replies
0
Views
561
JC
J
L
FA: LWB Shogun Diesel
Replies
0
Views
1K
Linger
L
J
FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - 10 Hours to go
2 3
Replies
50
Views
2K
David Taylor
D
Back
Top