FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - £1 NO Reserve - 3 days to go

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
> Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
> illegal?

They are the ones which the government are considering making illegal. There
are currently no detectors which are illegal to use.


 
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:45:45 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
>illegal?

To the best of my knowledge, no radar detectors are currently illegal.

If you believe the tabloid hype, the govt wants to make the detectors
(though not the GPS ones) illegal...probably as it's costing them revenue!!

Whether they do or not is another matter!

Regardless, legislation is probably some time off....and it didn't stop the
huge black market for these things when they were illegal to use some years
ago!
--

Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:45:45 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
>illegal?
>
>


Additionally, these things only have to save you once to virtually pay for
themselves!

In fact, the auction is at £52 currently....which means it will pay for
itself a few times over even if it does only save you the one time!
--

Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 
Cheaper not to speed and save lives ain't it


"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:45:45 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
> >illegal?
> >
> >
>
>
> Additionally, these things only have to save you once to virtually pay for
> themselves!
>
> In fact, the auction is at £52 currently....which means it will pay for
> itself a few times over even if it does only save you the one time!
> --
>
> Regards
>
> John [Essex, UK]
> Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply


 
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:34:16 GMT, "Hirsty's" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Cheaper not to speed and save lives ain't it

Generally speaking..Yes

A couple of things though..speed cameras are just revenue
generators..nothing more.

Everybody speeds! Show me a driver who says he *never* speeds and I'll show
you a liar!

Because they are just revenue generators, local Police authorities feel
completely justified hiding the bloody things, having mobile ones in
roadworks without the necessary signs warning you of the temporary speed
limits etc...the list goes on.

If speed cameras were *really* designed to minimise accidents and slow the
traffic, there would be huge signs warning you that you were approaching
one and the whole thing would be fluorescent yellow..not just the top..and
*none* of them would be obscured!!


--

Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 
Strange as it may seem I absolutely agree with you. They should remove the
lot and try to be less cynical in their approach to road enforcement.
Camera's for the right job yes but as revenue generators absolutely not. I
wonder how keen they would be if all the revenue were to be used to sort out
our crap transport system. Without a reduction of the current input.



"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:eek:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:34:16 GMT, "Hirsty's" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Cheaper not to speed and save lives ain't it
>
> Generally speaking..Yes
>
> A couple of things though..speed cameras are just revenue
> generators..nothing more.
>
> Everybody speeds! Show me a driver who says he *never* speeds and I'll
show
> you a liar!
>
> Because they are just revenue generators, local Police authorities feel
> completely justified hiding the bloody things, having mobile ones in
> roadworks without the necessary signs warning you of the temporary speed
> limits etc...the list goes on.
>
> If speed cameras were *really* designed to minimise accidents and slow the
> traffic, there would be huge signs warning you that you were approaching
> one and the whole thing would be fluorescent yellow..not just the top..and
> *none* of them would be obscured!!
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> John [Essex, UK]
> Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply


 

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
> Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
> illegal?

They are the ones which the government are considering making illegal. There
are currently no detectors which are illegal to use.


 
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:45:45 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
>illegal?

To the best of my knowledge, no radar detectors are currently illegal.

If you believe the tabloid hype, the govt wants to make the detectors
(though not the GPS ones) illegal...probably as it's costing them revenue!!

Whether they do or not is another matter!

Regardless, legislation is probably some time off....and it didn't stop the
huge black market for these things when they were illegal to use some years
ago!
--

Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:45:45 GMT, [email protected] wrote:

>Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
>illegal?
>
>


Additionally, these things only have to save you once to virtually pay for
themselves!

In fact, the auction is at £52 currently....which means it will pay for
itself a few times over even if it does only save you the one time!
--

Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 
Cheaper not to speed and save lives ain't it


"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 09:45:45 GMT, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >Are these the ones that are *already* illegal, or merely *soon to become*
> >illegal?
> >
> >
>
>
> Additionally, these things only have to save you once to virtually pay for
> themselves!
>
> In fact, the auction is at £52 currently....which means it will pay for
> itself a few times over even if it does only save you the one time!
> --
>
> Regards
>
> John [Essex, UK]
> Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply


 
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:34:16 GMT, "Hirsty's" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Cheaper not to speed and save lives ain't it

Generally speaking..Yes

A couple of things though..speed cameras are just revenue
generators..nothing more.

Everybody speeds! Show me a driver who says he *never* speeds and I'll show
you a liar!

Because they are just revenue generators, local Police authorities feel
completely justified hiding the bloody things, having mobile ones in
roadworks without the necessary signs warning you of the temporary speed
limits etc...the list goes on.

If speed cameras were *really* designed to minimise accidents and slow the
traffic, there would be huge signs warning you that you were approaching
one and the whole thing would be fluorescent yellow..not just the top..and
*none* of them would be obscured!!


--

Regards

John [Essex, UK]
Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply
 
Strange as it may seem I absolutely agree with you. They should remove the
lot and try to be less cynical in their approach to road enforcement.
Camera's for the right job yes but as revenue generators absolutely not. I
wonder how keen they would be if all the revenue were to be used to sort out
our crap transport system. Without a reduction of the current input.



"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:eek:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 22:34:16 GMT, "Hirsty's" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Cheaper not to speed and save lives ain't it
>
> Generally speaking..Yes
>
> A couple of things though..speed cameras are just revenue
> generators..nothing more.
>
> Everybody speeds! Show me a driver who says he *never* speeds and I'll
show
> you a liar!
>
> Because they are just revenue generators, local Police authorities feel
> completely justified hiding the bloody things, having mobile ones in
> roadworks without the necessary signs warning you of the temporary speed
> limits etc...the list goes on.
>
> If speed cameras were *really* designed to minimise accidents and slow the
> traffic, there would be huge signs warning you that you were approaching
> one and the whole thing would be fluorescent yellow..not just the top..and
> *none* of them would be obscured!!
>
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> John [Essex, UK]
> Remove the obvious spamtrap to reply


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - £1 NO Reserve
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
Steve
S
J
FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - Ends Tomorrow
Replies
0
Views
561
JC
J
J
FA: Boxed Snooper SD815is Radar & Laser Detector - 10 Hours to go
2 3
Replies
50
Views
2K
David Taylor
D
T
FA Kenwood Excelsion Z919 MP3 Car Stereo
Replies
0
Views
694
[email protected]
T
Back
Top