Freelander Beaver
Member
- Posts
- 59
- Location
- Bradford
Just took the dim's from the EGR valve last night as I was going to make something at work today to replace it and improve the flow.. I've also seen the ones on E-bay where it suggests a 40% increase in flow etc over the orig unit...
The question I have is that the available flow hole thru the existing unit is about 1485mm sq taking into account all the bobbin and internal features in there... but up stream from this, you have the MAF meter that lives in a bore of 42mm.. therefore 1385mm sq... so is there any real advantage in increasing the flow of this unit as there is a smaller bore before it?... Also the bend in the moulded feed to the EGR just before the rubber pipe looks even smaller... but you can't measure this unless you section the moulding?... Any thoughts??
The question I have is that the available flow hole thru the existing unit is about 1485mm sq taking into account all the bobbin and internal features in there... but up stream from this, you have the MAF meter that lives in a bore of 42mm.. therefore 1385mm sq... so is there any real advantage in increasing the flow of this unit as there is a smaller bore before it?... Also the bend in the moulded feed to the EGR just before the rubber pipe looks even smaller... but you can't measure this unless you section the moulding?... Any thoughts??