Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers...

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
E

Essb

Guest
Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to $3 a
gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!




 
Those of us who own real utility vehicles own them for their safety and
ability to move large things, including more people than you can stuff into
a Geo Metro. We don't really care what kind of mileage they get. If we
did, we wouldn't own them. Given that the average Suburban will last 2 or 3
times as long as a subcompact, and cost substantially less to maintain and
repair over its life, the cost is just about even per mile, even at $3/gal.

A few examples:
100,000 miles on a set of brakes, then just replace the pads. Try that with
a Cavalier.
$30 for a water pump and 45 minutes to install it. Or, $900 on a Cavalier
80,000 miles on a set of tires.
20 minutes to change 8 spark plugs. Several hours and much lost blood on
the average minivan to change 6.
250,000 mile engine life if the oil is changed religiously. Yeah, I know
there's someone out there with 300,000 miles on their Honda, but MOST of
them don't last that long. Pretty much ALL truck engines last much longer
than little car engines.

Given the amount energy consumed of pollution produced in the PRODUCTION of
a new vehicle, the SUVs don't actually pollute much more than compacts
because they last twice as long.

I will personally continue to drive my 12-year-old Suburban, even at over $3
a gallon, with a smile on my face, which you won't be able to see because
your rear-view mirror shows only my bumper.

Oh, and before you start the middle-east oil dependency lecture, my 2002
Tahoe burns E-85 (thats 85% Ethanol), so it runs on American corn and only
burns gasoline at the equivalent of 126 MPG.

Hope you don't get crushed by a real vehicle.
 
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] wrote:

> Oh, and before you start the middle-east oil dependency lecture, my 2002
> Tahoe burns E-85 (thats 85% Ethanol), so it runs on American corn and only
> burns gasoline at the equivalent of 126 MPG.


How many gallons of Diesel fuel did it take to produce that
gallon of corn liquor?

How many politicians did Archer Daniels Midland bribe to get the
ethanol subsidies needed to make he cost of that corn liquor
competitive?
 
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:08:32 -0500, "Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote:

>Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to $3 a
>gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
>Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
>
>
>


'Up' to $3? That would be less than half what we pay here in the UK,
while still grinning in our SUVs!

--

R
o
o
n
e
y
 
Well that is like ****ing in a fan.

--
HarryS My 2¢
"Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to $3
a
| gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
| Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
|
|
|
|


 
Never heard that one before HarryS ... "like ****ing into a fan" ... good
one! What's with these bozo's that don't see the big picture? Oh yeah ... I
remember ... the word is troll.

"HarryS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Well that is like ****ing in a fan.
>
> --
> HarryS My 2¢
> "Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> | Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to

$3
> a
> | gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
> | Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
>



 
tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa... I can't
wait to hit you with my SUV's (2) 1 heaver than the other (4800lbs,5200lbs)
and watch you, maybe I say maybe crawling from the wreckage..tee hee
hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa.

"Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to $3
> a
> gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
> Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
>
>
>
>



 
In reply to the how many gallons of diesel fuel it takes to produce a gallon
of ethanol. I am not sure how many gallons they can get from a bushel of
corn, but on my farm, I raise about 195 bushel average per acre and burn 4
gallons of diesel per acre to get it. I am sure they get several gallons per
bushel, so when you look at it there is no comparison. 4 gallons diesel =
several hundred ethanol.


"aarcuda69062" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Oh, and before you start the middle-east oil dependency lecture, my 2002
>> Tahoe burns E-85 (thats 85% Ethanol), so it runs on American corn and
>> only
>> burns gasoline at the equivalent of 126 MPG.

>
> How many gallons of Diesel fuel did it take to produce that
> gallon of corn liquor?
>
> How many politicians did Archer Daniels Midland bribe to get the
> ethanol subsidies needed to make he cost of that corn liquor
> competitive?




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
 
Actually the technical term is "troll". <g> But I do like yours!

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:31:24 -0500, "HarryS"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Well that is like ****ing in a fan.


 
In article <[email protected]>,
"The Adams Family" <[email protected]> wrote:

> In reply to the how many gallons of diesel fuel it takes to produce a gallon
> of ethanol. I am not sure how many gallons they can get from a bushel of
> corn, but on my farm, I raise about 195 bushel average per acre and burn 4
> gallons of diesel per acre to get it. I am sure they get several gallons per
> bushel, so when you look at it there is no comparison. 4 gallons diesel =
> several hundred ethanol.


You're right, there is no comparison.
From the Oregon department of Energy:

The cost of producing ethanol varies with the cost of the
feedstock used and the scale of production. Approximately 85
percent of ethanol production capacity in the United States
relies on corn feedstock. The cost of producing ethanol from corn
is estimated to be about $1.10 per gallon. Although there is
currently no commercial production of ethanol from cellulosic
feedstocks such as agricultural wastes, grasses and wood, the
estimated production cost using these feedstocks is $1.15 to
$1.43 per gallon.

Because a gallon of ethanol contains less energy than a gallon of
gasoline, the production cost of ethanol must be multiplied by a
factor of 1.5 to make an energy-cost comparison with gasoline.
This means that if ethanol costs $1.10 per gallon to produce,
then the effective cost per gallon to equal the energy contained
in a gallon of gasoline is $1.65. In contrast, the current
wholesale price of gasoline is about 90 cents per gallon.

The federal motor fuel excise tax on gasohol, a blended fuel of
10-percent ethanol and 90-percent gasoline, is 5.4 cents less per
gallon than the tax on straight gasoline. In other words, the
federal subsidy is 54 cents per gallon of ethanol when the
ethanol is blended with gasoline. The subsidy makes
ethanol-blended fuel competitive in the marketplace and
stimulates the growth of an ethanol production and distribution
infrastructure.
 

"bowgus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Never heard that one before HarryS ... "like ****ing into a fan" ... good
> one! What's with these bozo's that don't see the big picture? Oh yeah ...

I
> remember ... the word is troll.
>
> "HarryS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Well that is like ****ing in a fan.
> >
> > --
> > HarryS My 2¢
> > "Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > | Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to

> $3
> > a
> > | gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
> > | Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
> > |
> > |
> > |

Harry is right...its like ****ing away your money while still getting
****ed on.


> > |
> >
> >

>
>



 

"Richie" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:bLd%d.13516$u76.4348@trndny08...
> tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa... I can't
> wait to hit you with my SUV's (2) 1 heaver than the other

(4800lbs,5200lbs)
> and watch you, maybe I say maybe crawling from the wreckage..tee hee
> hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa.
>
> "Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to

$3
> > a
> > gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
> > Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
> >
> >

Yeh...right... thats why you drive them at 80 miles an hour 3 inches off
of someones bumber like a bunch of crazy maniacs, why feeling safe in a
5000 lb cage, yet endangering other people lives.



> >
> >

>
>



 
Another of my sayings is" Do not let your alligator mouth over load your
humming bird ass, but some times it is easier just to say troll.

--
HarryS My 2¢
"bowgus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
| Never heard that one before HarryS ... "like ****ing into a fan" ... good
| one! What's with these bozo's that don't see the big picture? Oh yeah ...
I
| remember ... the word is troll.
|
| "HarryS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| news:[email protected]...
| > Well that is like ****ing in a fan.
| >
| > --
| > HarryS My 2¢
| > "Essb" <Billy Lincoln> wrote in message
| > news:[email protected]...
| > | Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to
| $3
| > a
| > | gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
| > | Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|


 
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Those of us who own real utility vehicles own them for their safety and
> ability to move large things, including more people than you can stuff
> into
> a Geo Metro. We don't really care what kind of mileage they get. If we
> did, we wouldn't own them. Given that the average Suburban will last 2 or
> 3
> times as long as a subcompact, and cost substantially less to maintain and
> repair over its life, the cost is just about even per mile, even at
> $3/gal.


1) Extremely few of the people who drive large SUV's actually NEED the
power, and the statistics that support the safety issue completely offset
the "roll-over" issue with SUV's that kill and injure arguably as many
people.

2) You HAVE to be joking about the Suburban being low maintenance!!? Look at
a "Consumer Reports Buyers Guide". There are more black marks in every
catagory than almost every other vehicle in the guide.

3) Where are you getting the info on a Suburban lasting "2-3 times longer
than a subcompact"? Considering what crap the Suburban is, and how many
different makers of subcompacts there are, this is obviously a statement
mede out of bias for your Suburban.

4) Good God! You're making the comparison to a CAVALIER!!?? That's an even
BIGGER piece of s#%& than the Suburban. (not to mention the fact that it's
not a "sub-compact") I dare you to make that comparison to a Toyota Corolla!

5) Your "pollution" argument is too stupid to address.

6) You're actually going to compare the longevity of a a Suburban to a
Honda!!? Pleeeaasse!!! Again, this argument is too f%$^ing stupid to
address.



>
> A few examples:
> 100,000 miles on a set of brakes, then just replace the pads. Try that
> with
> a Cavalier.
> $30 for a water pump and 45 minutes to install it. Or, $900 on a Cavalier
> 80,000 miles on a set of tires.
> 20 minutes to change 8 spark plugs. Several hours and much lost blood on
> the average minivan to change 6.
> 250,000 mile engine life if the oil is changed religiously. Yeah, I know
> there's someone out there with 300,000 miles on their Honda, but MOST of
> them don't last that long. Pretty much ALL truck engines last much longer
> than little car engines.
>
> Given the amount energy consumed of pollution produced in the PRODUCTION
> of
> a new vehicle, the SUVs don't actually pollute much more than compacts
> because they last twice as long.
>
> I will personally continue to drive my 12-year-old Suburban, even at over
> $3
> a gallon, with a smile on my face, which you won't be able to see because
> your rear-view mirror shows only my bumper.
>
> Oh, and before you start the middle-east oil dependency lecture, my 2002
> Tahoe burns E-85 (thats 85% Ethanol), so it runs on American corn and only
> burns gasoline at the equivalent of 126 MPG.
>
> Hope you don't get crushed by a real vehicle.



 

"Kerouac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:pxi%[email protected]...
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Those of us who own real utility vehicles own them for their safety and
> > ability to move large things, including more people than you can stuff
> > into
> > a Geo Metro. We don't really care what kind of mileage they get. If we
> > did, we wouldn't own them. Given that the average Suburban will last 2

or
> > 3
> > times as long as a subcompact, and cost substantially less to maintain

and
> > repair over its life, the cost is just about even per mile, even at
> > $3/gal.

>


[Snippage: highlights remain]
> 2) You HAVE to be joking about the Suburban being low maintenance!!? Look

at

> 3) Where are you getting the info on a Suburban lasting "2-3 times longer
> than a subcompact"? Considering what crap the Suburban is, and how many


> 4) Good God! You're making the comparison to a CAVALIER!!?? That's an even
> BIGGER piece of s#%& than the Suburban. (not to mention the fact that it's
> not a "sub-compact") I dare you to make that comparison to a Toyota

Corolla!

> 6) You're actually going to compare the longevity of a a Suburban to a
> Honda!!? Pleeeaasse!!! Again, this argument is too f%$^ing stupid to
> address.


The original post was a masterpiece of entertainment. Purely bizarre or
perfect satire! The OP has either never owned anything but GM products or is
pulling our legs. (Note that this was crossposted to alt.autos.gm).

-John


 
I apologize to everyone for the cross-posting. I hate it when people do
that...

That being said, I sincerely hope it (Suburban guy) was satire...

THAT being said, I, do not align myself with the original poster's (the
"blllrrrpp" guy's) views.


"Generic" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Kerouac" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:pxi%[email protected]...
>> <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > Those of us who own real utility vehicles own them for their safety and
>> > ability to move large things, including more people than you can stuff
>> > into
>> > a Geo Metro. We don't really care what kind of mileage they get. If
>> > we
>> > did, we wouldn't own them. Given that the average Suburban will last 2

> or
>> > 3
>> > times as long as a subcompact, and cost substantially less to maintain

> and
>> > repair over its life, the cost is just about even per mile, even at
>> > $3/gal.

>>

>
> [Snippage: highlights remain]
>> 2) You HAVE to be joking about the Suburban being low maintenance!!? Look

> at
>
>> 3) Where are you getting the info on a Suburban lasting "2-3 times longer
>> than a subcompact"? Considering what crap the Suburban is, and how many

>
>> 4) Good God! You're making the comparison to a CAVALIER!!?? That's an
>> even
>> BIGGER piece of s#%& than the Suburban. (not to mention the fact that
>> it's
>> not a "sub-compact") I dare you to make that comparison to a Toyota

> Corolla!
>
>> 6) You're actually going to compare the longevity of a a Suburban to a
>> Honda!!? Pleeeaasse!!! Again, this argument is too f%$^ing stupid to
>> address.

>
> The original post was a masterpiece of entertainment. Purely bizarre or
> perfect satire! The OP has either never owned anything but GM products or
> is
> pulling our legs. (Note that this was crossposted to alt.autos.gm).
>
> -John
>
>



 
Essb wrote:
> Cant wait to see faces of SUV drivers when gas prices creep up to $3 a
> gallon....tee hee hheeeee heeee haaaa haaaaaa!
> Sorry....blllrrrpp...heee hee haaa!
>
>
>
>

Classic symptoms of inferiority complex.;-)
 

"Sigmund Freud" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Classic symptoms of inferiority complex.;-)


If you have a clue about Freud, you would know that he would align the
inferiority complex with the guy driving the big SUV. As in compensating for
other...aah....shortcomings.


 
Essb wrote:


>
> Harry is right...its like ****ing away your money while still getting
> ****ed on.
>
>

If you say so, it must be true!
 
Essb wrote:


>
> Yeh...right... thats why you drive them at 80 miles an hour 3 inches off
> of someones bumber like a bunch of crazy maniacs, why feeling safe in a
> 5000 lb cage, yet endangering other people lives.
>
>

There's that festering inferiority complex again. ;-)
 
Back
Top