Mr Noisy
Coming in your ears.
- Posts
- 10,146
- Location
- Altrincham, Cheshire
hello
so i just got back from the MOT, passed nicely
BUT i'm curious.
ive always known my car to be thirsty, just sometimes i cant believe its as thirsty as it is. and when you run it in the workshop your eyes sting after a few minutes.
so i've got the emissions data from the last few years and wondered if anyone might take a look at it?
on a side note, i started working heavily on the car in 2010, so it's 2010 results could have been particularly good due to new ignition parts etc.
anyway.
2008 HC - 206 ppm, CO - 0.71 %
2009 HC - 251 ppm, CO - 1.15 %
2010 HC - 204 ppm, CO - 0.38 %
2011 HC - 512 ppm, CO - 0.14 %
Im pleased that the CO is lower than ever by quite a long way, but cant understand why HC has doubled, even though the car gets more use now than ever.
It is a 92 Disco 3.5 EFi non-CAT model.
Any information on the subject would be appreciated!!
Cheers, Sam.
so i just got back from the MOT, passed nicely
BUT i'm curious.
ive always known my car to be thirsty, just sometimes i cant believe its as thirsty as it is. and when you run it in the workshop your eyes sting after a few minutes.
so i've got the emissions data from the last few years and wondered if anyone might take a look at it?
on a side note, i started working heavily on the car in 2010, so it's 2010 results could have been particularly good due to new ignition parts etc.
anyway.
2008 HC - 206 ppm, CO - 0.71 %
2009 HC - 251 ppm, CO - 1.15 %
2010 HC - 204 ppm, CO - 0.38 %
2011 HC - 512 ppm, CO - 0.14 %
Im pleased that the CO is lower than ever by quite a long way, but cant understand why HC has doubled, even though the car gets more use now than ever.
It is a 92 Disco 3.5 EFi non-CAT model.
Any information on the subject would be appreciated!!
Cheers, Sam.
Last edited: