Hi, which details? You mean her chassis no etc?A few more details if the rr please @kempoman
2.4 got to be a rare best now?
As for the damper if it is still solid, and there are no chunks of rubber hanging out then do not worry.
Have you got the part number for the VM damper?
Is there actually anything wrong with the one currently fitted?
See my reply in previous post.
Is it RTC4911?
Craddocks site says 'STC2985 use RTC4911'
Thanks for the heads up but for all the parts i bought it didn't own any differences.Take a look at lrcar on the net, there are two models, early 2.4vm and the later 2.4vm.
Some background, My RRC is from 1987 and I just have done a complete overhaul job a month ago. I have the damper pulley inspected and the rubber seal has worn off.
then, I welded the rubber part to the iron so that it would not fall out. Since then I would think the balancing could be out and so is the torsion.
I am not running her on high speed and normal speed is about 80-110 Km/h and retire from her 4x4 drive. Do you think without changing the damper pulley she would be fine for another 100k mileages?
Rare, there tons over here in France!!.Well it is open for debate, for example lots of modern diesels have dual mass flywheels DMF, they two jobs 1 smooth out the gearchanges/shock loads to the transmission, and 2 act as a damper for the engine, when the DMF fails lots of people fit solid flywheels in their place, years ago there were many predictions of impending doom/crank failure etc which do not seem to have come to fruition, now whether that would be the same for a crank damper I have no idea.
I think if you can get the part new I would replace it, bearing in mind how rare the 2.4 must be nowadays why risk it.
Rare, there tons over here in France!!.
Chrysler voyager around 1996 has the same lump in it. We had one that lost the timing chain. Luckily it's a non Interference engine and it was back on the road after a 1800€ bill in 2005
The classics are being dragged back onto the market here more so than ever and the prices are getting stupidI know of one classic rr around my area, and that has been parked up for years, literally have not seen one on the road for ages.
Same goes for the old shape chrysler, used to be all over the place a few years ago, and not seen one for ages.
Who wants a Chrysler voyager anyhow... Awful car...
Rare, there tons over here in France!!.
Chrysler voyager around 1996 has the same lump in it. We had one that lost the timing chain. Luckily it's a non Interference engine and it was back on the road after a 1800€ bill in 2005[/QUOTE
Dampeners don't seem to be available
There is a VM specialist in chesterfield who might be able to help
The VM 492 which is fitted to the old RRC's 1986-1989 were quite a rare thing in the UK With a whopping 106hp and 238nm it is hardly a powerhouse more for tax strangled areas which penalise larger engines.
The latter VM 425 was a better unit putting out 112hp around 300nm quite a good unit, the bottom ends were nearly unburstable however the cylinder heads are another story, particularly the rear most cylinder head, on the 2.4.
Overheating issues on the 2.4 were down to a particularly poor cooling system which was improved for the 425, models with Bullbars and spotlights were particularly susceptible to overheating and thus seldom ever have such accessories
My preferred motor of choice for the RRC is the 425VM
@tomcat59alan had one
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!