payydg
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 3,920
- Location
- Aberdeenshire
Hello, me and my friend are buying a land rover to drive to our medical elective in west Africa. As total novices we have done as much research as pos and have found a few options on autotrader and land rover magazines.
We were wondering what you experts thought of this one?
A 1991 (H reg) land rover 90 defender, 131000 miles, diesel, 5 speed Tdi manual (without overdrive).
The guy selling it is an RAF pilot, he's had it for 5 years and done a fair bit of work to it himself, with the exception of one major work professionally.
Rear seats removed and back is aluminium clad. He's owned the car for the last 5 years, covering 35,000 miles, and it has been serviced regardless of expense. In that time it has had a new rear cross member, new shocks and springs, new water pump and cam belt, new battery, new front brake calipers, front brake flexible hoses, nylon suspension bushes throughout. The car is fitted with a front bar and two 100 watt driving lights, clear front lights, electric radiator fan with manual adjustment, fuel pump kill switch, towbar, rear fog light, front wing aluminium panels, aluminium side kick panels, BF Goodrich tyres on pressed steel wheels and a sunroof. It is taxed until Jan 13 and has 12 months MOT remaining. Most of the work has been done roughly 5000miles ago, but in the past 5 years the owner reports no breakdowns, and it has never failed to start. The rear bearings are good, but have never been replaced.
It's not been used for any off-roading during his ownership (although the vehicles history prior to this is unknown; bought from a dealer in the peak district). It reaches 70mph quite comfortably.
It has it's original gearbox and clutch. He reports that there is some play in the gearbox but it has never locked or slipped out of gear, and there is no slipping/sticking of the clutch. Would an original gearbox in a vehicle of this age be expected to still have some longevity in it?
The stuff we are a bit worried about is that it's had the back 1/3 of the chassis and rear crossmember replaced due to corrosion which would have required some serious welding, which was done professionally. Does this kind of work mean that it's now unfit for a serious adventure? Or is it reasonable work for a car of this age?
What would be your assessment of such a vehicle? The impression we get from the owner is that much of the work has been out of passion for the vehicle and it's maintenance, and not brought on by any major failing of the vehicle.
Thankyou for your time in reading this, and we appreciate your expert advice
David and Scott
We were wondering what you experts thought of this one?
A 1991 (H reg) land rover 90 defender, 131000 miles, diesel, 5 speed Tdi manual (without overdrive).
The guy selling it is an RAF pilot, he's had it for 5 years and done a fair bit of work to it himself, with the exception of one major work professionally.
Rear seats removed and back is aluminium clad. He's owned the car for the last 5 years, covering 35,000 miles, and it has been serviced regardless of expense. In that time it has had a new rear cross member, new shocks and springs, new water pump and cam belt, new battery, new front brake calipers, front brake flexible hoses, nylon suspension bushes throughout. The car is fitted with a front bar and two 100 watt driving lights, clear front lights, electric radiator fan with manual adjustment, fuel pump kill switch, towbar, rear fog light, front wing aluminium panels, aluminium side kick panels, BF Goodrich tyres on pressed steel wheels and a sunroof. It is taxed until Jan 13 and has 12 months MOT remaining. Most of the work has been done roughly 5000miles ago, but in the past 5 years the owner reports no breakdowns, and it has never failed to start. The rear bearings are good, but have never been replaced.
It's not been used for any off-roading during his ownership (although the vehicles history prior to this is unknown; bought from a dealer in the peak district). It reaches 70mph quite comfortably.
It has it's original gearbox and clutch. He reports that there is some play in the gearbox but it has never locked or slipped out of gear, and there is no slipping/sticking of the clutch. Would an original gearbox in a vehicle of this age be expected to still have some longevity in it?
The stuff we are a bit worried about is that it's had the back 1/3 of the chassis and rear crossmember replaced due to corrosion which would have required some serious welding, which was done professionally. Does this kind of work mean that it's now unfit for a serious adventure? Or is it reasonable work for a car of this age?
What would be your assessment of such a vehicle? The impression we get from the owner is that much of the work has been out of passion for the vehicle and it's maintenance, and not brought on by any major failing of the vehicle.
Thankyou for your time in reading this, and we appreciate your expert advice
David and Scott