v8hotrodboy
Active Member
This guy seems to know his stuff, i have two of his Rover engine books and built my 4.2 using some of his tips. That seems to run well. How to Power Tune Rover V8 Engines for Road and Track [Book]
or even a 1.2 ton P6....
Internet is full of fit this fit that do this for hundreds of horsepowers, I don't want that, I want a torque monster.
Same here - and getting rather confused But is it then correct to assume that easiest, cheapest and most efficient way to gain power and more torque is bigger block or larger capacity if I have 3.5l now?
Hence if I fit 3.9l block to what I have is that possible or do I need other heads too and what wouls estimate outcome be in terms of BHP and torque?
lol should be 3.9 4.2 or 4.6 = loads of problems with blocks liners and headgaskets and I sticking with 3.5
You are sticking with a 3.5 cause you can't afford to change it lol
:d same here. And my 3.5 has only done 19k miles from a £3.5k rpi extravaganza. (didn't stop them only sealing the fuel pump on with sealant and no gasket tho..) all the upgrades i do on the 3.5 will be transferable to the bigger engines when i decide i want one of them.
thats not really true - not all 94mm bore blocks have liner/headgasket problems.
You are sticking with a 3.5 cause you can't afford to change it lol
Not long ago I read a thread with some great posts by 'Teflon'. It was titled "3.9 4.2 or 4.6". I don't know whether it will answer your questions, but I thought it was excellent food for thought. In essence, his main point was to make sure that whatever you've got under the bonnet, make sure it is running absolutely as well as it can in standard form, then go from there. I don't pretend to be an expert, but I thought that made perfect sense. Have a read:
http://www.landyzone.co.uk/lz/f42/3-9-4-2-4-6-a-82882.html
er yes they do and no , come here and say that!
significalty more prone than an already dated and problematic engine, sounds perfect- definatly worth investing thousands of pounds and hours in! :doh: