Datatek
Well-Known Member
Or even the straight 6Toyota V8 diesel...
View attachment 205773
Or even the straight 6Toyota V8 diesel...
View attachment 205773
Not sure but I dont think the RRC ever came with a 4.6 as original and certainly not a THOR.
Just to put my experience with the rv8 on this thread, I've rebuilt a few over the years and the old 3.5's were put together well, I'm just putting a 4.6/3.9 together and both motors on strip down had major issues caused by really bad engine builds...
The Buick version of the engine also lived on the USA and was even converted into a V6 that was in production right up until the mid 1990's I think.nb. 'Real Steel' used to market a stroker kit for the 3.5, taking the capacity to 4.3 as you say.
Don't know if the product is still on the market.
If the money difference is not a direct concern, then the 4.6 will easily out perform the 3.9. It isn't just the PEAK power, it is the extra torque trough-out the rev range, that you only get with extra displacement (or boost).I would like to thank you all for your kind responses, sharing your experiences and opinions. A quick recap of your discussions lead me to believe:
1. I should not worry about the millage;
2. 3.9 is preferable to 4.6;
3. The quoted prices to me seem to be fair.
I did not notice any comments about the acceleration of 3.9 engine vs. 4.6. Is this because the difference is negligible, or as a Range Rover driver, it is the last thing on anybody's mind?
There was even a 5.6 litre versionIf the money difference is not a direct concern, then the 4.6 will easily out perform the 3.9. It isn't just the PEAK power, it is the extra torque trough-out the rev range, that you only get with extra displacement (or boost).
Having top hat liners fitted to either engine will be pricey. You may want to research this before proceeding.
I would also recommend a new cam and followers. RV8's are renown for wearing them, causing low power. A slightly more perkier cam would also wake any engine up too.
4.6 engines come in two flavours. The earlier ones 1994 - early 1999 use the same injection system as you RRC. From 1999 on they used a Bosch injection system and a different intake manifold. If you are getting a latter engine, then I suspect the person fitting it will swap over the intake from your current engine and use the injection system from your current one too. You'd need to do more work to retain the latter intake manifold and Bosch injection or some other standalone injection system. Which means more money.
For reference, the 4.6 block is the same as TVR used in the Chimera, only they called it a 4.5 litre.
blocks and pistons were matched ie a h block would have h pistonsThe 3.5 was built on the old Rover engine line, back in the days when Rover took pride in how things went together. Standard pistons came in a range of sizes, with about half a thou difference between. Each piston was matched to a specific bore to give the exact tolerance required. In addition each piston and con rod set was weighed so that a matched set would be fitted to the engine. Between these two operations you got a very well balanced and smooth engine.
Rover used to go to extreme lengths to ensure they produced the best product. For example they has a gear testing jig where gear sets would be composed and run, with a fellow listening to them through a special ear piece to determine if the noise they generated was within acceptable limits. If not, then he would take out one of the gears, substitute another from the box and try again until he liked the sound of the two gears in mesh.