The BMS monitors the throughput of current to and from the battery, by connecting directly onto the battery negative terminal you would bypass the monitoring device and screw up the charging algorithms. By connecting directly to any other ground stud on the vehicle, you're ensuring that the charge and discharge current is seen by the BMS, that's all. Nothing bad will happen, just the vehicle systems won't operate necessarily as intended. Carrying out a battery discharge test through the BMS isn't a good idea though.
 
Electrically no, most use some sort of shunt to measure the current and are generally very accurate - accurate enough to measure quiescent current down to single mA and high enough to measure starter current in the 100's of Amps. Some of the early ones were true 'series' devices and were often damaged if the vehicle was incorrectly jump-started. The BMS usually communicates on a LIN to whichever module has the supervisor function for charging, autostop, etc.

If anyone is interested / suffering from insomnia, attached is the Description & Operation document for L405 battery management
 

Attachments

  • DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION.pdf
    878.4 KB · Views: 116
Graculus said:
Electrically no, most use some sort of shunt to measure the current and are generally very accurate - accurate enough to measure quiescent current down to single mA and high enough to measure starter current in the 100's of Amps. Some of the early ones were true 'series' devices and were often damaged if the vehicle was incorrectly jump-started. The BMS usually communicates on a LIN to whichever module has the supervisor function for charging, autostop, etc.

If anyone is interested / suffering from insomnia, attached is the Description & Operation document for L405 battery management
Click to expand...
It probably uses a Hall effect device rather than a shunt.
 
They do, I was just trying to keep things simple without opening another rabbit-hole... The early ford ones were a simple induction coil but suffered from drift if driven / parked for too long.
 
Well back too using the RR, got the father in laws mini to sort so iv left mine at his,
Facebook memories came up thought id share,
Screenshot_20240125_101412_Facebook.jpg
 
Replaced the desiccant in the air suspension drier - wasted time and money on that then, still have the same fault. Grr!
  • C1A13-64 (AF) Pressure does not decrease when venting gallery - Algorithm based failure - signal plausibility failure
Click to expand...

The strange thing is that it always lowers when using GapIID but almost never lowers the front of the car when selecting access mode (or when it needs to do it itself)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Range Rover L322 - not turning over
Replies
12
Views
2K
gold rover
gold rover
B
L320 range rover sport 3.0 tdv6 loosing power steering fluid
Replies
3
Views
533
Mark Piercy
Mark Piercy
F
1980 Range Rover 2 door v8 to 300tdi
2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Grrrrrr
Grrrrrr
T
Non start
Replies
3
Views
717
Datatek
Datatek
T
Fan Clutch??
Replies
14
Views
798
Grrrrrr
Grrrrrr