300bhp/ton Well-Known Member Yesterday at 11:44 #21 Datatek said: Too big and heavy to be called a car. Drives like a truck IMO and the seats are worse than an IVECO Click to expand... Car as an abbreviation of carriage would be perfectly correct tbh.
Datatek said: Too big and heavy to be called a car. Drives like a truck IMO and the seats are worse than an IVECO Click to expand... Car as an abbreviation of carriage would be perfectly correct tbh.
kermit_rr Very Full Member Yesterday at 12:01 #22 Datatek said: Too big and heavy to be called a car. Drives like a truck IMO and the seats are worse than an IVECO Click to expand... it looks like a car.. it sounds like a car... don't agree on the seats though.. i've driven many 7.5t iveco and the seats were always poor
Datatek said: Too big and heavy to be called a car. Drives like a truck IMO and the seats are worse than an IVECO Click to expand... it looks like a car.. it sounds like a car... don't agree on the seats though.. i've driven many 7.5t iveco and the seats were always poor
Atomician Well-Known Member Yesterday at 21:00 #23 Just to help clarify things, my Freelander is a utility vehicle, but we generally just call it a "ute" for short
Just to help clarify things, my Freelander is a utility vehicle, but we generally just call it a "ute" for short
kermit_rr Very Full Member Yesterday at 21:21 #24 You can utilise a car for many different purposes. Depending on size
N nigelbb Well-Known Member 41 minutes ago #25 The P38 is not a "truck" which is an Americanism. It's a "car". If you read the other forum that has loads of Yanks contributing they always call the P38 a "truck" even though they occasionally get corrected by the Brits.
The P38 is not a "truck" which is an Americanism. It's a "car". If you read the other forum that has loads of Yanks contributing they always call the P38 a "truck" even though they occasionally get corrected by the Brits.