I checked 8 logs from different vehicles cos i have many in my database and the biggest difference with hot engine was around 20*C in one case so the 40*C difference is still unexplainable, in most cases the difference is between 10 - 18 degrees with engine at normal operating temp(around 90) though it would have been relevant to know the outside temp when the readings were saved which i dont know
Fist of all on a cold start in the morning after the vehicle stood all night the ECT and FT readings should be very close cos the whole vehicle is at the same temp, then the difference will grow as the engine gets hotter, for example one log from my vehicle which was taken from cold start(not in the morning but after about 2 hours rest) ECT = 32, FT = 27 then after a long run ECT/92, FT/75 but there were moments with ECT/88, FT/79 so i'd conclude corroborated with other reading too that roughly between 10 and 20 is a normal range.... i can't find any logical explanation for a higher than 20 degree difference in a running engine what ever i do.
I have checked some earlier files and seems that during summer time and after longer run (higher air inlet temp) the diff for me also close to 15-10 *C.
But 40 surely high...
Attached two charts. 1st is a recent one done about a month ago, the 2nd one during summer when the engine was already hot.
View attachment 225214
No, I opened the data in excel and created the charts from there on a simple, easy way.Hi,
Charts are awesome! Did you make those with the nanocom CSV viewer or something else?
I can't install the nanocom software on my laptop (work laptop and the thing sees it as possible harmfull...)
Thx!
much higher or only a bit? I see from your pdf they the reading is about 45*C, what the thermometer shows?I took a laser thermometer at it and the coolant is pretty accurate but the fuel temp seems higher
No, I opened the data in excel and created the charts from there on a simple, easy way.
much higher or only a bit? I see from your pdf they the reading is about 45*C, what the thermometer shows?
No, this points toward an ECU misbehaviour, something happened with the ADC within it. At this point you better not invest more money untill you dont try another ECU, though warped manifold can cause the symptom you describedI took a laser thermometer at it and the coolant is pretty accurate but the fuel temp seems higher then the sensor shows (the new one!). Could this point towards an issue within the FPR?
No, this points toward an ECU misbehaviour, something happened with the ADC within it. At this point you better not invest more money untill you dont try another ECU, though warped manifold can cause the symptom you described
What about the turbo hoses? are you sure that are not delaminated ?
What about a pressure test to rule out an intercooler leak ?