woogoo said:

The project wasn't to reverse engineer other peoples work bit to write our own implementation using the applicable ISO documentation for guidance, everything I need to know is in these pages, albeit at a hefty cost of 500USD but, IMHO money well spent for what I would hope would have been an exceptional product.

Click to expand...

gavbriggs said:

whats it called???

Click to expand...

gavbriggs said:

can you explain this layer buisness, how do they implement it, data rate?

Click to expand...

gavbriggs said:

so they are re inventing the wheel!

dumbass!

facts are, as yet it cannot be done other than what is already released!

as for reverse engineering, if people can code it then there is someone who can de code it!!

its been done many times on software thats more complicated than stuff that will run on a '98 o/s.

in fact this computer is running an o/s thats only a couple of months old and is made by a company more profitable than whoever makes nanocom.

(john, i havnt forgot, still testing)

it took me seconds to circumvent any protection it may be using.

its been achieved by a group effort, as such it is of benefit to many!

stop bigging up a device that doesnt work and its costly. we are trying to achieve a solution that will benefit us all without having to shell out hundreds just to find out that the cars ferked and spend yet more hundreds.

as for dealers and specialists, who cares if they don't make money. i have the right to repair my own vehicle. they wont get my custom anyway and i have no interest in bieng a mechanic for a livin. it would spoil the fun.

i might aswell plug a cucumber into the dlc as plug a nanocom in!!

:welcome2:

Click to expand...