jamesmartin said:
it looks like you need the full kit , in ay case rerplacing the bush and not bottom bearing wouldnt be good practice
Click to expand...
Got it now Mate, Stupid me was wondering where the bearing was in mine but Ive just realized it will be still in the housing on Bench.
So would you go for new balls too after seeing pic of mine ? makes the job a lot dearer but suppose it makes sense if mine are to Knackered
 
border said:
Got it now Mate, Stupid me was wondering where the bearing was in mine but Ive just realized it will be still in the housing on Bench.
So would you go for new balls too after seeing pic of mine ? makes the job a lot dearer but suppose it makes sense if mine are to Knackered
Click to expand...
they are past best ie chromes pitted and flaking off
 
jamesmartin said:
they are past best ie chromes pitted and flaking off
Click to expand...
OK will order full kit. Need to order everything else while Im on , bearings brakes stub axles, drums ect. Front and Rear, so am I looking at Late as some parts state Early
 
border said:
OK will order full kit. Need to order everything else while Im on , bearings brakes stub axles, drums ect. Front and Rear, so am I looking at Late as some parts state Early
Click to expand...
yes for swivels brakes will be either single cylinder or double
 
This is what Ive got on my list so far, Shopping Cart - Paddock Spares still need brakes, cylinders, shoes and drums front and rear, my rears are bigger, so Im assuming there 11 inch and 10 inch at front, is that right ? cant think of anything else for Axle but I also need footwells for bulkhead and an outrigger for chassis so might as well get them on same order.
unless anyone can think of anything else I may need
 
Front should always be bigger than rear or same size.
Post some photo's of brakes with drums off
 
Blackburn said:
Front should always be bigger than rear or same size.
Post some photo's of brakes with drums off
Click to expand...
Well now Im really confused, mind you it does not take much. Im sure I read somewhere that some models had 11 inch rear and 10 inch at front
Anyway this is what I have just took off 109 axle, 11inch at rear and 10 inch at front. Now the rear had the backing plate and shoes fitted but they are missing from the front. First pic is Drums rear on the left and front on the right.
Second pic is brakes that were in rear,
Is this wrong,
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210506_175353.jpg
    IMG_20210506_175353.jpg
    296.2 KB · Views: 120
  • IMG_20210506_175415.jpg
    IMG_20210506_175415.jpg
    294 KB · Views: 110
Blackburn said:
Your fronts should also be 11" TLS type with the 11" rears.
https://pablanchard.co.uk/index.php?route=product/search&search=576973
If fronts are smaller when ever you brake rear will cause back end to skid.
Click to expand...
Thanks mate, th
Blackburn said:
Your fronts should also be 11" TLS type with the 11" rears.
https://pablanchard.co.uk/index.php?route=product/search&search=576973
If fronts are smaller when ever you brake rear will cause back end to skid.
Click to expand...
Cheers mate, think I've got it now, paddocks seem to think the front should have 2 cylinders on each side for some reason.
 
border said:
Thanks mate, th

Cheers mate, think I've got it now, paddocks seem to think the front should have 2 cylinders on each side for some reason.
Click to expand...
yes 109 should have twin cylinders thats what gives the increased front effort,88 only after 1980
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
1971 Land Rover 88 Series IIA Advice
Replies
13
Views
953
steve2286w
steve2286w
T
2,5 NA to 2,25 Petrol
Replies
15
Views
1K
ThomasLRNL
T
F
1980 Range Rover 2 door v8 to 300tdi
2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Grrrrrr
Grrrrrr
C
Truck cab fitting help
Replies
10
Views
579
Chonker
C
R
Series 3 Crankshaft Pulley suddenly seized?
Replies
11
Views
969
steve2286w
steve2286w