ay0un4

New Member
Just a quick photo from a shoot I did last week of Winston...

final-shot.web_-e1368294200591.jpg
 
has that land rover been photoshopped into that scenic wood view? the tyre flat spots and the shadows look all wrong......

its a nice landie though :)
 
has that land rover been photoshopped into that scenic wood view? the tyre flat spots and the shadows look all wrong......

its a nice landie though :)

+1

Clearly photo shopped and in on my phone...

Stick the original pic up, 'tis still a nice machine... :banana::banana::banana:
 
post the original, I teach photoshop and that's badly overprocessed in post looks like a cartoon, the original is prob far better, directional spotlight isn't needed

for a start when the sun is clearly directional (look at the tree tops) yu aren't going to naturally capture underside of your wheel arches???? , and the pool of light spot?? nope...., subtle highlighting of the proper pic would have been better

cheers steve
 
Last edited:
I swear down that the car was there and it isn't photoshoped to the extent you are suggesting...

The process follows, there is around 15 photographs taken whilst on a tripod, with a flash light going round the car lighting up the different parts, then all I have done is laid each photograph ontop of each other, exposing the different elements thats the only photoshopping I've done...

I promise you!

I will post to LR Mag, thanks :)

post the original, I teach photoshop and that's badly overprocessed in post looks like a cartoon, the original is prob far better, directional spotlight isn't needed

for a start when the sun is clearly directional (look at the tree tops) yu aren't going to naturally capture underside of your wheel arches???? , and the pool of light spot?? nope...., subtle highlighting of the proper pic would have been better

cheers steve

But thankyou Steve for the comment, This is my style of photography, which I probably won't be changing for a while!
 
Last edited:
But thankyou Steve for the comment, This is my style of photography, which I probably won't be changing for a while!

I prefer your style on your site.....nothing wrong with having a style, I for one use my D300 for mainly HDR a real marmite style of composite image creation... however compared to your jag pic and lowlight mini which are superb.. in my opinion this one just looks way overdone.... that's why earlier posters said it looks dropped in and p/shopped, the Jag is illuminated perfectly but its not isolated from its background... very nice

however not everyone rates hurst as an artist but he earns more than me lol, beauty is in the eye.....

cheers steve
 
Last edited:
I prefer your style on your site.....nothing wrong with having a style, I for one use my D300 for mainly HDR a real marmite style of composite image creation... however compared to your jag pic and lowlight mini which are superb.. in my opinion this one just looks way overdone.... that's why earlier posters said it looks dropped in and p/shopped, the Jag is illuminated perfectly but its not isolated from its background... very nice

however not everyone rates hurst as an artist but he earns more than me lol, beauty is in the eye.....

cheers steve

I agree, and will defo take into account, I think it is a tad OTT.. but still learning!
 
Great picture! IMO

Why not have an amateur photo contest here at LandyZone?
winner gets a couple LZ stickers and the photo posted to the front cover for a couple months?

Just saying....................
 
Great picture! IMO

Why not have an amateur photo contest here at LandyZone?
winner gets a couple LZ stickers and the photo posted to the front cover for a couple months?

Just saying....................

How amateur we talking? My landy looks as if its been thrown together by an amateur I.e. me, do I win?
 

Similar threads