andyfreelandy

Well-Known Member
Had the above and lack of power at 70 mph and on hills.
Read up all I could and cleaned MAP, replaced turbo solenoid and checked all vacuum pipes.
Road test was great.
One week on, loss of power and eml on hills. P1470 again!
My question is: is the ecu clever enough to know the difference between fuel pressure problems and turbo boost? No low pressure code but pump is noisy. Seeing as it would present the same symptom could an intermittent pump problem fool the ecu into a boost fault code??

Will do live run fuel pressure under load but not easy to do on your own!!
 
Had the above and lack of power at 70 mph and on hills.
Read up all I could and cleaned MAP, replaced turbo solenoid and checked all vacuum pipes.
Road test was great.
One week on, loss of power and eml on hills. P1470 again!
My question is: is the ecu clever enough to know the difference between fuel pressure problems and turbo boost? No low pressure code but pump is noisy. Seeing as it would present the same symptom could an intermittent pump problem fool the ecu into a boost fault code??

Will do live run fuel pressure under load but not easy to do on your own!!

@andyfreelandy - I'm in read, read, read mode to get to know what to expect with my TD4 acquisition. I think the ECU can see the difference if it is similar to BMW diesels. I had a similar problem with a 2003 5 series diesel a long time ago. Horrid pressure leaks were where my problems lay but also with a micro-cracked turbo solenoid.

It is coincidence that I was reading a french forum where the same problem you are having is described. You could read it if you want to, use google translate if you need, it's all at https://forum-auto.caradisiac.com/topic/58199-perte-de-puissance/.

BUT ironically they point to this FIXED landyzone commentary which may help you: - https://www.landyzone.co.uk/land-ro...sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=fr&_x_tr_pto=op,sc

Good luck!
 
Last edited:
Many thanks @Kerlaan.

I have read the landyzone post and hence changed the turbo solenoid first.
The problem is, if the ecu is cutting fuel due to over boost it could look like the pump on live data as the pressure will fall!!
 
Many thanks @Kerlaan.

I have read the landyzone post and hence changed the turbo solenoid first.
The problem is, if the ecu is cutting fuel due to over boost it could look like the pump on live data as the pressure will fall!!

Ouch. Then that leaves the ECU, the pump or the internals of the turbo doesn't it? I bet your turbo is clean as a whistle if what I am deducting about you from your postings is true. My TD4 manual has, in it's life since new, now at 165,000miles (oh the joy of receipts) is three fuel pumps! If only the failure mode was recorded or understood.
 
three fuel pumps! If only the failure mode was recorded or understood.
I have opened up a pattern pump and an oem one.
Pattern pump very badly made and brushes wore out very quickly due to alignment issues.
The oem one had an unfortunate fracture of the brush holding mech but was much better engineered. Search, photos are on here somewhere!!!

Wrt the turbo being as clean as a whistle!!! Thanks for the compliment but it's not my car!!!
 
I am not surprised to see any of that. My background is in aerospace design and latterly I was VP in a US filtration company for mostly aero but other industries too. This explains my preference for OEM products. Although one can lay criticism at LR for the supplied design standards, pattern parts never undergo the extensive system wide testing that is needed to validate the parts. Now the Britpart stuff I have seen to date tends to steer me away for engine and fuel system parts. Your posting has done nothing to change my view. As for filtration, filters look like easy, peasy pleated products but believe me, the investment to produce the OEM qualifying products is harsh. As for K&N filters, well I know I will attract a barrage of abuse, but I could not fit them to a toy. Oh and my vehicle was always serviced at LR dealers. So the equipment fitted is OEM hence why I bought it.

The issues you and I discuss also have an impact on civil passenger carrying aircraft too to a lesser extent! I will never fly SouthWest in USA. :mad:
 
If the vanes are sticking, they are in the exhaust route.

How can they be cleaned without taking turbo off??
Some cleaners say to spray into air intake. Can't see how that would work??
 
Some cleaners say to spray into air intake. Can't see how that would work??
chemical reaction ??
ones i looked at mentioned that .. i didn't note details
or .. could have been with the 'mix-with-fuel' type ..
[ i forget the chemical reaction details ]
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````
 
If the vanes are sticking, they are in the exhaust route.

How can they be cleaned without taking turbo off??
Some cleaners say to spray into air intake. Can't see how that would work??

@andyfreelandy - the variable vanes are on the inlet side of the turbo. BUT the vanes are also in the exhaust route when the EGR is open. And therein lies the problem perhaps. The EGR opens when the exhaust gas pressure is exceeding inlet manifold pressure at partial load operation (that is it should not open at higher engine speeds under high turbo pressures).

So if I understand you, there are two questions. Cleaning and the signs and symptoms you mentioned (on a client vehicle?). For cleaning, turbo sprays are administered at low engine speed (2000rpm) when the turbo is supposed to be recirculating gases via the EGR into the vanes of the turbo. So by spraying then, you get the solvent chemical action cleaning the vanes with the added benefit of high temperature gases aiding the chemical activities. But I cannot see that the exhaust side pressures and flow directions will ever draw a cleaner into motive side of a turbo. So you are right, those vanes can only be cleaned by stripping the turbo. I personally think that such cleaners would need to be applied regularly; they'll never clean a badly clogged, vane coated turbo as if by miracle. But equally for a client who wants his car back for Xmas at lowest cost, you're being asked to qualify for beatification! This is why I retired, customer expectation is rarely balanced and reasonable.

On the engine performance question; on a non-variable vane turbo, the performance of the induction pressure is limited by the waste gate on the exhaust side opening, limiting engine damage potential. But with a variable vane turbo, the low end engine speed emissions performance is changed by opening the EGR. The EGR should be closed under high turbo speed operation, for example going up a hill under higher engine load. If the EGR is blocked off, it cannot leak. But the lower end performance is modified in such instance (but blocking EGR's for most is about emissions though most don't realise it, it's fashionable behaviour). If the EGR leaks at higher engine speeds, then the gas pressures (and mass air flow rate) around the system will be much different that the ECU expects at the various monitoring points and then cleverly limits engine power via pump to prevent damage but at the same time ****es us off with a loss of power when we need it, towing up a hill? And a low line pressure and reduced flow perhaps?

Is the EGR connected? Is it end of life and the valve sticking open in a non-predictable way? I like EGR's myself. But they need to be clean and in an operable, reliable condition at all engine speeds.

So, to become a saint and quickly discover the "failure mode" of your customer vehicle, I'd blank the EGR and high load test it. If that doesn't work or you've inspected the EGR condition and operation, then I would agree, you need live data on the pump. I'm on my own too and appreciate how you feel about some jobs and their difficulty. Let alone customer expectation and the personal stress it brings. You'll be richer for this experience. Or grey like me knowing alcohol should not be consumed in small quantities at critical relaxation times.

This link may help your client understand turbo's and with your explanation why a cleaner MIGHT work but isn't guaranteed:
 
If the vanes are sticking, they are in the exhaust route.

How can they be cleaned without taking turbo off??
Some cleaners say to spray into air intake. Can't see how that would work??
Hello Andy,
not sure if that is of any help, but got translated it through. Unfortunately the pictures on some pages are not The Diesel Bible | The BMW M57 engine: facts - troubleshooting - repairs (dieselbibel-de.translate.goog) , but you might know the words from it. Some decision making charts are in as well. Could try to contact him and get the charts to translate as well if it helps.
KR
Matthias
 
How can they be cleaned without taking turbo off??
Some cleaners say to spray into air intake. Can't see how that would work?

In my experience they don't.
The best way to keep a diesel engine clean thoroughly is to drive it flat out.
Diesel engines don't like running at light throttle, as gas speed is slow, so soot and carbon has time to stick where its not wanted, and due to the lower exhaust gas temperature, it doesn't burn off.
Drive it hard, and it stays clean throughout the whole exhaust system.
 
Many thanks to all for the contributions!
Will be checking manifold pressure, fuel pressure, vane movement and egr for stuck openness!!!

If that all fails I will apply a "Do not drive over 70mph or up hills" on the dashboard in festive writing!!!
Not changing a turbo this side of Xmas.
 
With a P1470 which indicates boost issues, is it remotely possible it is a low fuel pressure??
Would expect a fuel pressure related fault code?
 
With a P1470 which indicates boost issues, is it remotely possible it is a low fuel pressure??
Would expect a fuel pressure related fault code?
Unless the ECU has the capacity to derate the fuel pump, then the pump has no fault and the ECU is limping the engine. That is a guess on my part though. I am not yet sufficiently experienced with FL1 ECU interactions.
 
With a P1470 which indicates boost issues, is it remotely possible it is a low fuel pressure??
Would expect a fuel pressure related fault code?
The ECM is smart enough to be able to tell you a relevant code, so a boost issue wouldn't be caused be a fuel issue, or vise versa.
 
The ECM is smart enough to be able to tell you a relevant code, so a boost issue wouldn't be caused be a fuel issue, or vise versa.
and so the ECM/ECU would give a code, not necessarily a fault but a diagnostic output. I hadn't thought of it that way.
 
To try and solve this one I have recorded a Pscan live data log for a good Td4 driving up hill in 2nd gear measuring revs, airflow, manifold pressure and egr duty. Also hp and LP fuel pumps.

I have transferred data dump to excel and will compare with car that is overboosting.
Pscan has useful feature for logging but needs to be manipulated in excel to make use of it.
 
Working 2002 TD4 (not saying it's perfect !) Driven up mild hill in second gear keeping RPM to around 3,000 ish.
Low Pressure Fuel Pump
upload_2021-12-20_19-46-24.png
High Pressure Pump
upload_2021-12-20_19-47-34.png
Airflow
upload_2021-12-20_19-48-10.png
Manifold Pressure

I'll do the suspect vehicle tomorrow which, incidentally, is now no longer showing P1470 it is showing P1e30 short circuit to V Batt.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2021-12-20_19-48-37.png
    upload_2021-12-20_19-48-37.png
    20.9 KB · Views: 132

Similar threads