SpanishTony
Active Member
Did you take it for a test drive before buying, as all of those faults seem pretty obvious to find/notice. I would be even more concerned at the bits of the car he didn't inspect.
No different car - and I still got duped!Is it the same car from your previous thread:
https://www.landyzone.co.uk/land-rover/am-i-being-duped.318713/
Cheers, I do too..Hope it works out for you
That's better, i thought from your earlier post all the report said was not fit for purpose, I take the seller has the above report as well then.The inspection cost me £255 which I can claim back from the courts (if it goes that far).
The vehicle was inspected with the aid of a trolly jack.
The following conditions were noted: Both front wiper blades do not fit correctly and insecure to arms. Left rear light cluster lens cracked. All side lights flash intermittently at times when the engine is idling. Headlight flash does not operate when headlights are off. Service indicator shows -15675miles over due. Excessive oil/fluid loss covers the underside. Gearbox oil losses are excessive. Roadtest: The gearbox fails to operate correctly. There are several clunking noises at lower speeds when changing lower gears. Air bag warning light comes on at times when driving. Rattles from both front suspension assemblies when driving. Low ratio switch will not move. This rocker type switch is stuck on one position. The mileage was recorded at 121581, Chassis number SALLMAMA33A126606, the vehicle is fitted with budget tyres all with at least 5mm tread depth.
CONCLUSION This vehicle is found with a considerable number faults that will require rectification and ongoing attention, further faults may become apparent upon investigation and repair. As result of the collection of faults the vehicle is seen not to be "fit for purpose." All the described faults are seen to have been present at the point of sale. The owner has been advised not to drive the vehicle.
Yes the seller has the report, I emailed it to him on Monday, I got no reply so I rang yesterday and was told that the owner of the garage knows about it. I actually sent them an email two weeks ago asking for my money back but they said they had fixed the faults so I took the car back but the faults were still there. In the email from a fortnight ago I stated that if I had not heard back from them within two weeks then I would take the matter further which will be small claims court, I think I'll include trading standards and vosa as well because they did the MOT and I'm pretty sure it's dodgy given the faults on the car.That's better, i thought from your earlier post all the report said was not fit for purpose, I take the seller has the above report as well then.
Have you written to them requesting a full refund and sent it recorded or what is your next step, small claims ?
I take a witness and record the convo for my sake more than theirs. It makes me behaveAll true, i just find that if you can go an talk to somebody face to face it is much harder for them to fob you off
I paid well under the limit of 10k under half actually.All good advice but in my opinion forget recording conversations go straight to legal advice don't know how much you paid but claims court has limits.
It might be worth drawing up a simple collection note for them to sign if they don’t take it away on a trailer or have trade plates to cover the sorn as if they just drive it you could be liable if it gets pinged on ANPR.I said they would have to pick the car up and take it there themselves because I have sorned the car .
Very interesting - I didn't know about the make money claim online and the money saving expert is a good read too. I would love the car to be right, it looks ace and is a great place to be when driving...apart from the faults of course!I am sure you have already read the ins and outs of going to court but for anyone interested the following may be of use
https://www.gov.uk/make-money-claim-online
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/n...-costs-more-to-reclaim-it-in-court-from-today
Please also note that there is a little caveat in Law wherein , supply of goods, repairs, etc, must be completed in a 'timely manner'. Therefore any faffing about and delaying tactics by the garage can be used against them. I have personally used it when work being done, that reasonably should have been completed within 7 days, took 30 days. I got 40% off the bill, without going near a court just by pointing out that little gem.
Good luck with everything. I know only too well what it is like to deal with dodgy garages. The good news is I still love my Range Rover