300bhp/ton
Well-Known Member
Why do you say that??I'd go as far to say, "a very strange engine to put in a luxury car!"
Why do you say that??I'd go as far to say, "a very strange engine to put in a luxury car!"
Because I had only seen them as "industrial" engines here, we had vm's running pumping units generators, lighting plants and powering fishing trawlers.Why do you say that??
Not true I’m afraid. We have a G plate on an 89 plate which is a 2.5 VM.
I believe LR toyed with the idea of fitting the 5 cylinder 3.1 litre VM into the range rover before going with the 2.4, now to me thats the engine they should have gone with.
The thought never entered my headBut it wouldn't have been good to have the dozzel quicker and better than the v8 would it
They did, there was one for sale on The Bay last year.On reflection it was a six cylinder version.I believe LR toyed with the idea of fitting the 5 cylinder 3.1 litre VM into the range rover before going with the 2.4, now to me thats the engine they should have gone with.