In message <i1eco011tvebt7evujlk2gtd41r77lg3gf@4ax.com>, Mother <"@ {m}
@"@101fc.net> writes
>On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:12:11 +0000 (GMT), dbell@zhochaka.demon.co.uk
>("David G. Bell") wrote:
>
>>I don't recall anything previously, here or in alt.fan.landrover, which
>>would justify your foul-mouthed abuse. Obviously, there are issues I am
>>not aware of. But the manner of your response only diminishes your own
>>reputation.
>
>My 'reputation' being as broad as it's long I guess.
>
>I have no interest in hiding my dislike of anyone making incorrect
>assumptions about who I am, what I do or how I may choose to spend my
>time. FWIW, I'm equally well know for this in a.f.l where I believe I
>originally plonked the op.
>
Then perhaps you'd be so kind as to "plonk" me again as it obviously
didn't work last time. I'm not really interested in whether you dislike
me or not, nor whether you accept my view of you or not. I'll leave
others to make up their own minds, whereas you seem to want to ram your
twisted opinions down everyone's throats, just like a typical net-bully.
The phrase "get a life" springs to mind.
--
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting

In message <20041101.1212.98169snz@zhochaka.demon.co.uk>, David G. Bell
<dbell@zhochaka.demon.co.uk> writes
>On Monday, in article
> <qd7co0tmbmuqnbs13sjamsq1985a6h47ob@4ax.com>
> "@{m}@"@101fc.net "Mother" wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:47:15 +0000, Geoff <geoff@DELETEanoraks.uk.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Odious in that you seem to resort to insult rather then any form of debate.
>>
>> Reasoning with ****wits, as you so competently demonstrate, is like
>> ****ing into the wind.
>
>I don't recall anything previously, here or in alt.fan.landrover, which
>would justify your foul-mouthed abuse. Obviously, there are issues I am
>not aware of. But the manner of your response only diminishes your own
>reputation.
>
>
Oh it was quite trivial really. Dave from llama 4x4 did a general rant
about the government in a thread about the Lib Dems policy on taxing
4x4s and I did a bit of a rant back about his rant (cos IMO it was
distracting from a serious point). Then this clown jumped in and called
me a ****wit, so I replied in kind and called him a mother ****er, which
I thought was a vaguely amusing pun on his sig. He's one of those " I
speak my mind and don't care what people think" types. Likes to dish it
out but can't take it back. Seems he can't even kill file properly.
--
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting

On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:23:57 +0000, hugh <hugh@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:

>Oh it was quite trivial really. Dave from llama 4x4 did a general rant
>about the government in a thread about the Lib Dems policy on taxing
>4x4s and I did a bit of a rant back about his rant (cos IMO it was
>distracting from a serious point). Then this clown jumped in and called
>me a ****wit, so I replied in kind and called him a mother ****er, which
>I thought was a vaguely amusing pun on his sig. He's one of those " I
>speak my mind and don't care what people think" types. Likes to dish it
>out but can't take it back. Seems he can't even kill file properly.

Still beating your wife?

Mother wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 20:23:57 +0000, hugh <hugh@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:
>
>>Oh it was quite trivial really. Dave from llama 4x4 did a general rant
>>about the government in a thread about the Lib Dems policy on taxing
>>4x4s and I did a bit of a rant back about his rant (cos IMO it was
>>distracting from a serious point). Then this clown jumped in and called
>>me a ****wit, so I replied in kind and called him a mother ****er, which
>>I thought was a vaguely amusing pun on his sig. He's one of those " I
>>speak my mind and don't care what people think" types. Likes to dish it
>>out but can't take it back. Seems he can't even kill file properly.
>
> Still beating your wife?
percussive maintenance we call that.