the whole don't thrash it when cold thing doesn't work! i have replaced the heads on at least 6 kseries engines that have never been thrashed let alone when they were cold, it is down to poor quality metal used in the head, not using hight corrected liners (very early Kseries engine were built properly) and **** head gaskets the landy/pagid gaskets are good and are used on normal cars as an upgrade. But if the head isn't checked for pourosity around the fire rings and the cylinders don't sit at the correct hight the gasket will fail again!
having spoken to quite a few experts most seem to have differing explanations of why they have these headgasket failures, plastic head pins, hotspots, poor design, head bolt stretch, badly designed water coolant expansion tank, lack of oil cooler,
You dont find it underpowered?
dont even think about using them a s a tow car...they are over loaded already...
the metal may be LM25 but it still goes porus due to poor casting, the very early blocks were assembled with diferent hight liners so they all protruded the correct distance from the blockface.The metal in the k-series is LM25 aluminium, same stuff they use in F1 cars. The only difference in the early and late engine blocks is the plastic dowels.
Regarding the rev from cold issue, its widely accepted amongst k-series enthusiasts (Lotus boys, MG/Rover) that the the stat on the inlet side causes most thermal stress when it initially opens during warm up. The MGF cup cars prepared by Techspeed motorsport never had the stat installed and yet never suffered from hgf until hugher mileage.
race engines are warmed up in the pit before going out on track to prevent coldrunning problems
as for towing with the 1.8 it is a no no..
they just cant cope..allright with a wee trailer, but much bigger and they know about it. i beleive there has been clutch problems with the hippo, any of you guys in the know the ins and outs about that?
whats the cause there?
aint it a case of "yu pays yo money - yu take ya choice" I just wudnt risk it - i think the odds are stacked against you.
mind yu NI - on a separate note the Rover 75 uses a 1.8Turbo which is based loosely on the "K" so its possible to fit that as a staright swap fur the 1.8.
it would be interesting to hear what other engines have been transplanted into these successfully with out too many probs..any thoughts guys??
Hello There,
Im New!!
Picked up our X Reg Freelander with only 26K on the clock last night.
3 door, with leather and all the usual stuff.
Dealer (not land rover) said to bring it back on mnday as ABS light was on all the time. Drove it home, my wife went to work, (4 miles) rang me on the way back from work saying that the ABS, the Traction Control and Hill Decent lights were all on.
I have read a few posts on here explaining what this fault is, usually an ABS sensor, not to worried as garage have said they will sort it.
Should I be worried???
The car has only done 26K, is absolutely immaculate, and I mean like brand new, no bonnet chips, no nothing, has a more than full service history and it drives like brand new.
Since coming to this forum I have read nothing but negative stuff regarding the 1.8 engine.
Are the problems more likely to happen on a high mileage vehicle and should my almost just run in 26k be OK?
I know its the "how long is a piece of string question" but my vehicle is genuinely like brand new, are the well documented problems with the 1.8 engine in every vehicle?
Surely every 1.8 freelander cant have all these problems as there would be law suits galore etc.
Thanks for reading my post and I genuinely hope not to have to visit here to often (as in only when problems arise)!!!
ps on a serious note, my wife is a child minder and we bought it for her to ferry loads of kids around in and as such some serious, genuine advice would be really appreciated, as we have a 7 day money back guarantee with the garage we bought it from, as long as we dont do over 500 miles in 7 days, we can take it back no questions asked!
Thanks all
Michael
what does that mean?
can't you tell that by engine noise and the fact the vehicle is trying to move..
i had to find the biting point for clutches on all sorts of cars from new bmw,mercs, second hand ****rons,fords and the like to very old lagondas for the purpose of installing a semi-auto clutch. and i nevver had a proplem finding it nor could imagine a case where it would be called awesome.
if the clutch is working properly the transition from no drive to full drive should be smooth and with mimimum distance between the point you can select a gear and the point where it starts to transfer power from engine to wheels. of course some clutches have heavier springs in them to cope with the power output, but that dosn't mean it has to be sharply taken up.
i still don't see how a clutch biting point can be awesome. a biting point is just that , A POINT, in the travel of the clutch 'pedal'
what you are decribing is tha actual operation of the clutch which is an whole different thing
Well you dont have to agree with me slob, but I have told it like it is. Believe me when you are sitting in endless traffic travelling to and from work everyday it makes all the difference.