Tbh the evoque is bad, it's worst feature is the lack of room in the cabin, atleast for stretched peeps like me ;)

L322 is the same weirdly..

How stretched are you - are you left over from the inquisition and they put you on the rack?

I'm over 6ft and its plenty big enough - or do you mean rear leg room, which I agree is a bit tight if you are sat behind me....
 
x
How stretched are you - are you left over from the inquisition and they put you on the rack?

I'm over 6ft and its plenty big enough - or do you mean rear leg room, which I agree is a bit tight if you are sat behind me....

I think we had a big chat about this a couple of months ago, on this very forum. It seemed to work out to how we are all slightly different. I am 6' with a 36" inside leg. I, find the leg room sadly wanting. Can't remember who it was who is taller but with shorter legs and finds leg room fine. There were all sorts of similar tales.
It may also depend on driving position, seat height, back rest position, ad infinitum. However, again, personally, another inch or two in front and rear would improve space for some drivers and some passengers, who are a little 'stretched' :)
 
x


I think we had a big chat about this a couple of months ago, on this very forum. It seemed to work out to how we are all slightly different. I am 6' with a 36" inside leg. I, find the leg room sadly wanting. Can't remember who it was who is taller but with shorter legs and finds leg room fine. There were all sorts of similar tales.
It may also depend on driving position, seat height, back rest position, ad infinitum. However, again, personally, another inch or two in front and rear would improve space for some drivers and some passengers, who are a little 'stretched' :)

Makes sense. my legs are shorter, only 34" - and I can see that would make a difference in lots of ways.
 
How stretched are you - are you left over from the inquisition and they put you on the rack?

I'm over 6ft and its plenty big enough - or do you mean rear leg room, which I agree is a bit tight if you are sat behind me....

i'm 6"6 on a good day with a 39" leg.

the front leg room in very dire in all Landies for me, the L322 is bad but the worst is the RRC.. ;)
 
IMG_4383.jpeg
Not sure I have seen one yet, but the newer models leave me cold. No presence or substance too them IMHO.

I had a similar discussion when they first came out - then I arrived at the car park and saw one parked next to my L322.

looks quite a bit lower and smaller.
 
i'm 6"6 on a good day with a 39" leg.

the front leg room in very dire in all Landies for me, the L322 is bad but the worst is the RRC.. ;)

I'd expect you to find all cars a bit wanting for leg room! Don't try any of the Japanese one's then, I tried driving a Lexus 400 a while ago and I had not gone a mile before I had to turn back it was so bad.
 
I'd expect you to find all cars a bit wanting for leg room! Don't try any of the Japanese one's then, I tried driving a Lexus 400 a while ago and I had not gone a mile before I had to turn back it was so bad.
One fo the reasons i don't own a Shogun or Landcruiser ;)

The P38 is the only car i can really get comfortable in..
 
x


I think we had a big chat about this a couple of months ago, on this very forum. It seemed to work out to how we are all slightly different. I am 6' with a 36" inside leg. I, find the leg room sadly wanting. Can't remember who it was who is taller but with shorter legs and finds leg room fine. There were all sorts of similar tales.
It may also depend on driving position, seat height, back rest position, ad infinitum. However, again, personally, another inch or two in front and rear would improve space for some drivers and some passengers, who are a little 'stretched' :)

I think most of us are over 6'. Might have been Saint with the shorter legs. Doesn't he look like Daddy Crood?
 

Similar threads