That'll be wind danDoesn't really look like a proper Rangie at all. Those Baby-Rangie's make me smile.
Back from the yUK? Just in time, you might not be allowed in after FridayThat'll be wind dan
Probably got a second job thenNHS Secretary £18k - £23k average, NHS nurse £23k - £34k average
HP same as a lot of people. Or maybe got it added to her lip filler loan
Tbh the evoque is bad, it's worst feature is the lack of room in the cabin, atleast for stretched peeps like me
L322 is the same weirdly..
Doesn't really look like a proper Rangie at all. Those Baby-Rangie's make me smile.
How stretched are you - are you left over from the inquisition and they put you on the rack?
I'm over 6ft and its plenty big enough - or do you mean rear leg room, which I agree is a bit tight if you are sat behind me....
Not sure I have seen one yet, but the newer models leave me cold. No presence or substance too them IMHO.What do you think of the Velar? They seem quite small too.
x
I think we had a big chat about this a couple of months ago, on this very forum. It seemed to work out to how we are all slightly different. I am 6' with a 36" inside leg. I, find the leg room sadly wanting. Can't remember who it was who is taller but with shorter legs and finds leg room fine. There were all sorts of similar tales.
It may also depend on driving position, seat height, back rest position, ad infinitum. However, again, personally, another inch or two in front and rear would improve space for some drivers and some passengers, who are a little 'stretched'
How stretched are you - are you left over from the inquisition and they put you on the rack?
I'm over 6ft and its plenty big enough - or do you mean rear leg room, which I agree is a bit tight if you are sat behind me....
Not sure I have seen one yet, but the newer models leave me cold. No presence or substance too them IMHO.
i'm 6"6 on a good day with a 39" leg.
the front leg room in very dire in all Landies for me, the L322 is bad but the worst is the RRC..
Indeed, it just doesn't make me think "Range Rover" at all. More like a poser's "hot-hatch". I shall not be buying one.View attachment 199307
I had a similar discussion when they first came out - then I arrived at the car park and saw one parked next to my L322.
looks quite a bit lower and smaller.
One fo the reasons i don't own a Shogun or LandcruiserI'd expect you to find all cars a bit wanting for leg room! Don't try any of the Japanese one's then, I tried driving a Lexus 400 a while ago and I had not gone a mile before I had to turn back it was so bad.
Your just jealous
x
I think we had a big chat about this a couple of months ago, on this very forum. It seemed to work out to how we are all slightly different. I am 6' with a 36" inside leg. I, find the leg room sadly wanting. Can't remember who it was who is taller but with shorter legs and finds leg room fine. There were all sorts of similar tales.
It may also depend on driving position, seat height, back rest position, ad infinitum. However, again, personally, another inch or two in front and rear would improve space for some drivers and some passengers, who are a little 'stretched'
The Dad off of cloudy with a chance of meatballs.I think most of us are over 6'. Might have been Saint with the shorter legs. Doesn't he look like Daddy Crood?
don't you mean 6'6"on one side if you've got a 39" leg, is your car adapted?i'm 6"6 on a good day with a 39" leg.
the front leg room in very dire in all Landies for me, the L322 is bad but the worst is the RRC..
yerp i'm lopsideddon't you mean 6'6"on one side if you've got a 39" leg, is your car adapted?
They're just an Evoque pumped up a little. So an FL4 reallyWhat do you think of the Velar? They seem quite small too.