lilman
New Member
Without wishing to be a pedant, The US form of old English is actually a truer reflection of 17th century English, than our coloquial form that we use today. It conforms to certain rules and structure, which ours no longer does.
Or yu could say they are just backward
Or yu could say they are just backward
Last edited:
West Slope Rover
Well-Known Member
We say "backwards" and it is our elegant heritage.Without wishing to be a pedant, The US form of old English is actually a truer reflection of 17th century English, than our coloquial form that we use today. It conforms to cwrtain rules and structure, which ours no longer does.
Or yu could say they are just backward
Without wishing to be a pedant, The US form of old English is actually a truer reflection of 17th century English, than our coloquial form that we use today. It conforms to cwrtain rules and structure, which ours no longer does.
Or yu could say they are just backward
think its certain! cwrtain looks welsh and thats a whole new argument
Dewin
Well-Known Member
Don't bring scousers into it, they can't argue back as their Giro's don't cover internet access ... unless they've pinched a mobile phone
godzilla84
Active Member
Don't bring scousers into it, they can't argue back as their Giro's don't cover internet access ... unless they've pinched a mobile phone
Ay Ay Ay! Calm down! Leave us scousers alone!! Feckin wools chattin crap!
Dewin
Well-Known Member
:mooning:ya know I'm right...
... at least in respect of 98.6% of them .... 99% if they're REDS
godzilla84
Active Member
Dont make me cross the river dee and steal your wheels!
Dewin
Well-Known Member
godzilla84
Active Member
haha, yeah!
