Land Raver
Well-Known Member
Then keep the 22"" wheels
They is probably changing the wheels because they can sell them for a lot more than the 19's. Another benefit is it will make your vehicle drive betterer and have less faults under the warranty.WE were sold the vehicle from a garage with the 22 inch alloys, at no point did they even suggest that this would be a problem !! Then after 16 days of driving it the suspension failed, they offered to change the alloys to 19 inch to increase performance. We bought the vehicle as we loved the way it looked, if they want to change the alloys then surely it is not as described !!
I bought the vehicle to mainly go to work and back, approx 6 miles four times a week, i have no intention ( as a 53 year old nurse ) to go 'off road', lol i'm far to old for such activities. The point is that i bought the vehicle because it looked the 'dogs bollocks' and i love it. However after having it 16 days the suspension failed and i sent it back under the 30 day rejection as thought this would lead to further issues. This was rejected by the garage and was informed that a height suspension sensor was cleaned and as by magic it now works !! They also said as a 'good will gesture' they would replace my 22 inch alloys for 19 inch alloys as this would increase performance. So firstly, the car is not fit for purpose, as i cannot drive it due to suspension issues, and the car has been at the garage for the past 2 weeks, and secondly, if they reduce the size of the alloys then it is not as described. So how can they reject my early rejection before 30 days of purchase as per Consumer Rights Act 2015. However, it seems that they can if they reject your rejection !! The law is an ASS !!!!!!It would be difficult to argue that 22" wheels are not fit for purpose. There are simply some downsides to running a RR on them. It also depends on what purpose you want the vehicle for. If you like the look of oversize wheels, only drive on the road and are not too worried about the ride quality, then 22" wheels will look good and make you proud. If you plan to ever go off road (or live in Edinburgh) then switch to the 19"s.
The point is that i bought the vehicle because it looked the 'dogs bollocks' and i love it. However after having it 16 days the suspension failed and i sent it back under the 30 day rejection as thought this would lead to further issues. This was rejected by the garage and was informed that a height suspension sensor was cleaned and as by magic it now works !! They also said as a 'good will gesture' they would replace my 22 inch alloys for 19 inch alloys as this would increase performance. So firstly, the car is not fit for purpose, as i cannot drive it due to suspension issues, and the car has been at the garage for the past 2 weeks, and secondly, if they reduce the size of the alloys then it is not as described. So how can they reject my early rejection before 30 days of purchase as per Consumer Rights Act 2015. However, it seems that they can if they reject your rejection !! The law is an ASS !!!!!!
Confused. Air suspension occasionally has issues; sometimes these are serious, sometimes it is something simple like a sticky height sensor. You say the dealer has fixed the problem and that the car now works. If the fault is no longer there, what are your grounds for rejection?
Sadly, if you are freaking out over what sounds like a very minor fault, then L322 ownership may not be an enjoyable experience.
You are under no obligation to change the wheels to cheaper ones. If you chose to allow the dealer to swap them, then you can hardly claim the vehicle is not as described as you authorized the change.
The Sale of Goods Act is not an ass. It gives you the right to return an item if it was not fit for the purpose for which it was bought. If an otherwise sound car develops a fault and the dealer fixes it, then the car can still be used for the purpose for which it was bought and the dealer is under no obligation to return your money. Unless you specifically stated that you wanted the vehicle to be suitable for off road use, then having 22" wheels does not affect the car's fitness for purpose either.
PS the 'Sales of goods act went out with the arc and has been replaced with the 'Consumer Rights Act 2015'.You obviously do not understand the Consumer Rights Act 2015, It states as under this act you have a right to reject if not fit for purpose, not of satisfactory quality and not as described. You have a right to reject something faulty and are able to a full refund within 30 days of purchase. My rights are not fit for purchase as i have been unable to drive this vehicle the past 2 weeks due to suspension issues. My rights have been breached because the car i was sold is faulty and does not match the description. Under this act i can demand a full refund on 'early rejection'. The car i purchased went wrong after 16 days of purchase, this act gives me a right for early rejection. Under this ACT you do not have to accept repair if the fault was within 30 days of purchase. I paid nearly £9,000 for this vehicle that i have been unable to drive for over two weeks now !!!!! I suggest that you read this ACT for your own future reference and then appologise for your insensitive comment.
Yer missed a bit. The act provides a mechanism. If the seller refuses to follow the rules then it is up to you to take action to enforce it.You obviously do not understand the Consumer Rights Act 2015, It states as under this act you have a right to reject if not fit for purpose, not of satisfactory quality and not as described. You have a right to reject something faulty and are able to a full refund within 30 days of purchase. My rights are not fit for purchase as i have been unable to drive this vehicle the past 2 weeks due to suspension issues. My rights have been breached because the car i was sold is faulty and does not match the description. Under this act i can demand a full refund on 'early rejection'. The car i purchased went wrong after 16 days of purchase, this act gives me a right for early rejection. Under this ACT you do not have to accept repair if the fault was within 30 days of purchase. I paid nearly £9,000 for this vehicle that i have been unable to drive for over two weeks now !!!!! I suggest that you read this ACT for your own future reference and then appologise for your insensitive comment.
WE were sold the vehicle from a garage with the 22 inch alloys, at no point did they even suggest that this would be a problem !! Then after 16 days of driving it the suspension failed, they offered to change the alloys to 19 inch to increase performance. We bought the vehicle as we loved the way it looked, if they want to change the alloys then surely it is not as described !!