tomcat59alan
Well-Known Member
Try 38 rear 28 front.
You just want me to go out in the rain to look at my owners manual don't you. You could have brought some sun back with you. I always do !!
Try 38 rear 28 front.
You just want me to go out in the rain to look at my owners manual don't you. You could have brought some sun back with you. I always do !!
No forget it, 35 and 38 look pretty similar if your blind though.
No forget it, 35 and 38 look pretty similar if your blind though.
Well, I for one, unlike some, am willing to admit I'm wrong. Yes, it's 38 so I will have to get my compressor going tomorrow. I have been running round at 35 for 9 year's. It's stopped raining by the way
The rear middle of the rear tyres has worn down to the wear bars, I read on hear some were that 28 front 30 rear woz good if not carrying owt heavy in the back, only carry my two dogs in the back most of the time and don't tow anything.
I run 28 front & 32 rear (unloaded) for me gives the best ride & tyres still good after 20k miles! Lucky if i got 12k out of the tyres on the Touareg.
might up the rear to 32 then when swap them round and see how they wear, the rear woz 40 when I got it last week hence the middles worn, the avons are new on the front so hope the one that's scrubbing on the edge will be ok on the back, always keep my eye on my tyres anyway.
The bloke whos doing the tracking said the back looks ok, just been to much in the tyres.
Must admit Land rovers 38 psi under all load conditions for the rear is a bit of a mystery to me. Specially when you consider under normal load the fronts at 28 psi have much more weight on them.[/q
because the rear of a p38 is heavier than the front as I found out when I lifted one on a forklift, good job I was breaking it.
Just trying to get over to you that wear on the inside or outside shoulder of one tyre on an axle is not usually a tracking problem.
Must admit Land rovers 38 psi under all load conditions for the rear is a bit of a mystery to me. Specially when you consider under normal load the fronts at 28 psi have much more weight on them.[/q
because the rear of a p38 is heavier than the front as I found out when I lifted one on a forklift, good job I was breaking it.
Well that's a new one on me,
Well would say on a car its the tracking, but the RR is new to me so I don't know, Don't now anything much about them yet,and thinking about it, The bloke whos doing it didn't say it woz the tracking, he just had a good look at the tyres and said he can do it next week, will be 45 quid, so I just sort of thought its the tracking, but like I said the RR is a new thing to me, so I know nothing.
Must admit Land rovers 38 psi under all load conditions for the rear is a bit of a mystery to me. Specially when you consider under normal load the fronts at 28 psi have much more weight on them.[/q
because the rear of a p38 is heavier than the front as I found out when I lifted one on a forklift, good job I was breaking it.
I would tend not to agree with that statement. Across the range the rear end is on average 232 pounds lighter than the front end.
Just trying to get over to you that wear on the inside or outside shoulder of one tyre on an axle is not usually a tracking problem.