Wildefalcon
Well-Known Member
My son is swapping his good but rusty focus for a series. The ford costs £9 per day in town, the series is ULEZ exempt and with decent rust proofing means no replacement cost, reducing the TCO even further.
Unless escaping a ULEZ the above is best. And if landy need to be off the road a bit for some repair it is not a problemSeries 2a with petrol was no more than 20mpg and 200tdi 30mpg regardless how you drive it. V8 petrol even worse.
Not sure why you need to budget 30k for a daily driver.
I think in the winter you would still get fed up with it.
Have a cheap daily and that way you can enjoy your Land Rovers when you want to, not when you have to.
I’m thinking as it also doesn’t run full time 4WDSeries SWB with 200 should do better than a defender, its the weight thing again.
Should be as long as historic tax classA series is fun as a toy
Used as a daily I can see the fun wearing off very quickly
I dont think the series diesels are ulez exempt?
My mistake, I have just checked and yes it is foc, but sadly not from the congestion charge.Should be as long as historic tax class
Congestion charge zone is tiny, about a square mile of Central London, and, as your link shows, doesn't operate after 6pm.My mistake, I have just checked and yes it is foc, but sadly not from the congestion charge.
View attachment 288513
Umm, about ten square miles!Congestion charge zone is tiny, about a square mile of Central London
I’ve been primarily in London for the first few months and I’ll admit I’ve never had an issue with congestion zone as generally if I’m going that central will take the TubeCongestion charge zone is tiny, about a square mile of Central London, and, as your link shows, doesn't operate after 6pm.
I have been driving in and around London since I could drive at all, and I have never entered the congestion charging zone during hours of operation. So I can't see it being a problem except for people who need to take a vehicle to work in the zone.
Fair enough. I have never measured it. But I do know I have never needed to enter it.Umm, about ten square miles!
Yes, I think it was expanded a while back. The daughter is one problem, she lives in it, works in it, and if we want to go out that'll be in it too. Another problem is that if I've got something to do up there I do actually like driving in central, especially in decent weather roof off in the lightweight because you get to see the architecture better. It's a pretty nice city.Fair enough. I have never measured it. But I do know I have never needed to enter it.
Driving to my mate's place in the Ditch, you see the warning signs along the Euston Rd, but I always go along the 501 ringroad, so no need to turn right.
It may have been extended, for all I know, I don't think I have been up there in a car for about 3 years.
It is a problem if a relative lives in it.Yes, I think it was expanded a while back. The daughter is one problem, she lives in it, works in it, and if we want to go out that'll be in it too. Another problem is that if I've got something to do up there I do actually like driving in central, especially in decent weather roof off in the lightweight because you get to see the architecture better. It's a pretty nice city.
I know this is very specific, but I was wondering if anyone has a similar build and what the fuel economy is like?
Can't see why the fuel mileage would be much different to a Tdi Defender. And they do about 20-25 on diesel, maybe over 30 if you drive like there is an egg under the accelerator, and never go over 60 mph.
Series 2a with petrol was no more than 20mpg and 200tdi 30mpg regardless how you drive it.
Agree entirely.I wouldn't be worrying too much about fuel economy. If it is a diesel it will do about the same regardless of what configuration it is in. I have come the conclusion that the aerodynamics (and speed) make far more difference than anything else.
View attachment 288866
^^ 110 hardtop with a disco transfer box and disco 200tdi, running 265/75 Bfg AT
View attachment 288867
^^ 90 hardtop, TD5, standard drivetrain, running 265/75 Bfg AT (ignore the best MPG that is an error)
View attachment 288868
^^ 88 series 3 softop, 2.25 diesel with OD, running 7.50 Michelin XZL
As you can see there is not that much difference between any of them and they are all averaged over a long time (especially the 110). With an old land rover there is much more important things to worry about than MPG ad if you are worried about MPG the easiest way to improve it is alter your driving style rather than modify the vehicle.
The 110 above (1989) was my daily for 13 years before the engine fire, then the td5 above became my daily and once rebuilt the 110 will be back as a daily drive, I am doing about 30k a year so don't listen to anyone who says they cannot be a perfectly usable daily drive.
Well, I thought I better give an update on this!Id drive the series youve got currently every day for 6 months and see if you still want to daily drive one.
Having lived and relied on old crap as my only transportation, you almost certainly will get fed up with it. Youll want something that doesnt let rainwater in like a colander, youll want something that can overtake someone whos yet to figure out that the pedal on the right makes the car go faster, and actually what I found personally was that youll want something that will just shut up sometimes, and not have half the pedestrians turning to look at you in slight bewilderment as you rattle up the same hill, day after day after day, and then get out looking like youve wet yourself.
I love an old landy (almost) as much as anyone else on this forum, but theres a reason so few of us drive them everyday!