Looks OK in the flesh IMO, certainly less of a fat arse than an L322, bit academic though, if I had that kind of money an L405 is not what I would spend it on, the list of gizmo's that the L405 has that I do not want would fill a page:)

Yeah, the only way to see a vehicle properly is in the flesh .. I haven't seen one yet .. :) I also guess photo's can be made to look how the photographer/client wants them to look.

I'd certainly like to be in the position to afford one thobut ..
 
Nope...the 2012/13 L322 was the last best looking Range Rover....the L405 is just a beefed up Freelander in my eyes...:(

I absolutely agree! They got it right just before they binned it. :doh:
But the L405 is a heck of a car, the changes are not just cosmetic. Wouldn't it be lovely to get all the new tech in a 2013 L322 shape.
 
I absolutely agree! They got it right just before they binned it. :doh:
But the L405 is a heck of a car, the changes are not just cosmetic. Wouldn't it be lovely to get all the new tech in a 2013 L322 shape.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, to me the fat arsed L322 competes with the BL land crab for the title of all time ugly motors.
 
To be honest it looks a little bit to........shiny!if they did a "black" version like merc do( not that I'm a lover of Mercs let that be said)that would look good
 

Similar threads