Funonthefarm
Active Member
Hi all, so in the process of re chassis’ing the 90... so it will be a bit and bolt rebuild... but stainless or zinc coated bolts?
Hi, from what little I know about dissimilar metal corrosion, stainless fixings are a dangerous choice for the humble steel/ally defenders. SS A2 or A4 usually has the higher potential over the substrate material and in the case of the defender, it definitely does which will cause the substrate to "rot" quicker than if you had a zinc plated fixing instead.Hi all, so in the process of re chassis’ing the 90... so it will be a bit and bolt rebuild... but stainless or zinc coated bolts?
That's the main issue, standard SS bolts are not as strong as carbon steel 8.8 bolts.Don't forget all that stainless bolts are far weaker than 8.8 carbon. I would not recommend using stainless for anything structural ( bumpers , seat belts, towing hitches,suspension)
Gluv
On the inode scale it appears that SS is a good 0.2 difference which is pretty much 20% more reactive and is higher up so will react with the ally, and eat it faster... where the zinc is lower so the ally will eat the zinc first in a sacrificial manor till it hits the steel below...That's the main issue, standard SS bolts are not as strong as carbon steel 8.8 bolts.
Re the corrosion there is little difference between SS bolts and uncovered Carbon steel bolts if you look at galvanic charts they are not far apart.
So fundamentally... no benefit other than removing them at a later date, or actually if weaker and more prone to reaction and eating the expensive aluminium parts, it actually worse, please let me know if I have understood this correctly.. With fingers crossed, as a nut and bolt rebuild should be a considerable time before I need to take it to pieces again!
Everyone likes shiny!!!Nope, not as far as I know - it's entirely up to you and how much value you put on the shininess of your fixings
The benefits and down-sides are exactly as you say (again, afaik)...
That's the main issue, standard SS bolts are not as strong as carbon steel 8.8 bolts.
Re the corrosion there is little difference between SS bolts and uncovered Carbon steel bolts if you look at galvanic charts they are not far apart.
Don't forget all that stainless bolts are far weaker than 8.8 carbon. I would not recommend using stainless for anything structural ( bumpers , seat belts, towing hitches,suspension)
Gluv
But what’s the actual advantage of the SS bolts? As I said above, they are technically worse in both strength and galvanic potential, cost more all for the fact that I’m hopeful more than 20years time when another chassis is need that they are “a bit” easier to remove? There doesn’t seem to be a significant justification? If they prevent or help the corrosion issue I wouldn’t even be questioning it... but it seems like the emperors new clothes to me.... I also took advance from one of the leading chassis manufactures and they advise against the use of SS. So is there any clear justification for them?
Probably doing the wrong thing, but whenever I remove a bolt the new one is given a good dose of copper grease 1st.