Turboman
Mab An Gov
Sound proofing, carpets....... Stripped them all out, pointless. Radio doesn't work.
In that case, the earplugs are the cheapest solution for you!
Sound proofing, carpets....... Stripped them all out, pointless. Radio doesn't work.
How about the gramophone is that still going alright?Sound proofing, carpets....... Stripped them all out, pointless. Radio doesn't work.
Turboman,
I don't mind the engine noise, rattles, bangs etc. It's better than Radio 4 and conversation is impossible. I couldn't ask for more
I took my MT s off and that made a massive difference.I spent ages soundproofing mine and then I go and put some Copper STT Pro's on it , which are not too noisy for an aggressive tyre, but at between 60 and 70 you do need to start raising your voice a bit....
Once again green house tape works a treat for totally reducing the noise coming out of my wimmins cake hole.Internal noise sources in the vehicle can often include wimmin and children!
Earplugs are strongly recommended!
Once again green house tape works a treat for totally reducing the noise coming out of my wimmins cake hole.
Got a little takker but he's quiet!You might need an industrial size roll if you ever have kids!
Got a little takker but he's quiet!
Thanks Yalan. That is pretty much what I intend to do in the front. I'm well on the way to covering the rear tub. Photos to followI used the 2mm silent coat under the std rubber matting and it did a good job - the doors also ent from a rattly thin crash to a nice thud when soaked. Money well spent IMHO
So what happened when the fire service turn up on a false alarm.A great trick is to close all Windows and flaps and let a smoke bomb off inside. I can't remember who on here did it but they claimed the whips of smoke gave away all the leaks whilst he ran around.marking them all with a bright crayon.
Err I have done the whole pressure spray from outside and almost nothing came in. The water has been seeping in on an obscure pathway that is not immediately visible otherwise I would have found it by now. And as per the original post I don't want a quiet car, just a slightly less noisy one. Been there, done the BMW and sold it for something more fun many years agoIf you want to find leaks, take your Land Rover to a car wash. Sticking stuff over the floor is asking for trouble. It will trap water where it can't be seen. If you want a quiet car buy a BMW.
I like that a lot Allan! I plan to do do my bonnet when I have finished inside. Did it make much difference and does it stay on ok?
That looks really goodI used the 2mm silent coat under the std rubber matting and it did a good job - the doors also ent from a rattly thin crash to a nice thud when soaked. Money well spent IMHO
So here's an update on my progress so far...I thought it was about time I chipped in with some help for others...
I have been looking at options to reduce the noise levels inside my Defender. Let's be honest - it's about reduction not sound proofing. If you want a quiet vehicle buy a Nissan Leaf.
Now there is a lot of info about noise reduction on this an other forums. Some of it is really helpful but some is, well, a bit weak to put it politely.
There is a lot said about how the only way to reduce noise is to add mass. Bigger, heavier rubber etc is a common stock solution. From my engineering days I know it is more complicated. There are also people out there who think that something like dynomat is basically an over priced bitumen roofing produced. It's not.
I used to work for the (then) largest butyl rubber manufacturer in the world. Butyl is really hard to make and so it is expensive but it also has some remarkable properties. One is that it absorbs vibration in a way that is way beyond the ability of most other rubbers. We used to demonstrate this by dropping two balls - one made from natural rubber and one made from butyl. The natural one would bounce back into the air, the butyl one would almost stop dead in its tracks. In not very sciency terms, the natural rubber one released the vibration energy back out again while the butyl one absorbs it even though they were basically the same weight.
Noise is vibration. Vibrating panels transfer noise by vibrating the air. More vibration, more noise. By fitting a vibration absorbing material to a panel, it vibrates less and so vibrates the air less, and so becomes quieter. This can be achieved by adding lots of mass but it can also be achieved by adding less mass of a better absorbing material. Sticking with the natural rubber vs butyl example, I don't have any scientific test data but it is common sense that 2mm of butyl will absorb a lot more vibration than 2mm of natural rubber. Purely guessing, it wouldn't be surprising if you needed 4mm of natural rubber to get the same reduction but that would weigh twice as much. So it's not simply a question of adding more mass, what that mass does with the sound energy is important.
Of course 'soft furnishings' are great at absorbing vibration (and therefore sound) but if your defender leaks then it has to be closed cell material or you will be driving a rotting sponge in no time.
As for the bitumen roofing material, it is not made from butyl, it's closer to road tar than any rubber material. Those smells that people comment on, they are the volatile bits of the tar evaporating and I wouldn't expect them to be good for you. Lots of aromatic oils are carcinogenic and so I would be amazed if the roofing materials are designed for use in a confined space such as inside a defender, even if it does by design and default allow a lot of air flow through the vehicle. Just on health grounds I would give them a wide berth.
So what I'm I going for? I've already got some camping mats under my head lining. Next step is some 2mm butyl based material for the entire floor pan. I'd prefer that it didn't have an aluminium coating as that will reduce the effectiveness a bit but it's not readily available. I'll see what that does before I do anything else.
Hope this helps.