kevwill · Nov 28, 2012

gold rover said:
All I can say is that anyone who appreciates the foibles and peculiarities of LR/RR would appreciate those same features in Triumphs

That probably explains why I ended up buying a Rangey - after owning a Spitfire, Herald, Dolomite Sprint, Triumph 2000, and the TR7. Go for a drop head, they look so much better. Wish I'd got round to dropping a v8 in it (easy conversion). Back in the late 80's I even had a Triumph Amphicar! A Herald in water - scary!!

Datatek · Nov 28, 2012

gold rover said:
All I can say is that anyone who appreciates the foibles and peculiarities of LR/RR would appreciate those same features in Triumphs

True, except for the TR7, an ugly unreliable heap of ****. I would enjoy any TR up to the 6IRS but not the 7, the MR2 is much better built handles better and is reliable.

kevwill · Nov 28, 2012

Datatek said:
True, except for the TR7, an ugly unreliable heap of ****. I would enjoy any TR up to the 6IRS but not the 7, the MR2 is much better built handles better and is reliable.

Oh you are so cruel datatek. But right of course. But anything up to a TR6 would cost a heap of cash (plus the Lucas elec ignition was very unreliable). The Triumph straight 6 was a great engine. The slant 4 in the TR7 was, as you say an unreliable heap of ****, and way underpowered; but the car was designed to have the rover v8. As for build quality, well British Leyland at the height of its powers, and on its last legs.

Datatek · Nov 28, 2012

kevwill said:
Oh you are so cruel datatek. But right of course. But anything up to a TR6 would cost a heap of cash (plus the Lucas elec ignition was very unreliable). The Triumph straight 6 was a great engine. The slant 4 in the TR7 was, as you say an unreliable heap of ****, and way underpowered; but the car was designed to have the rover v8. As for build quality, well British Leyland at the height of its powers, and on its last legs.

That sadly is why I don't have one. Electronic ignition is not difficult to replace with different kit I believe

Putting a V8 in the 7 might have made it go, (they still didn't stop) but it would never have made it pretty.

kevwill · Nov 28, 2012

Datatek said:
That sadly is why I don't have one. Electronic ignition is not difficult to replace with different kit I believe
Putting a V8 in the 7 might have made it go, (they still didn't stop) but it would never have made it pretty.

Depends on the body kit.....I like this one

Datatek · Nov 28, 2012

kevwill said:
Depends on the body kit.....I like this oneView attachment 38392

The model in the foreground looks quite racey, the background is positively pornographic

gold rover · Nov 28, 2012

Datatek said:
That sadly is why I don't have one. Electronic ignition is not difficult to replace with different kit I believe
Putting a V8 in the 7 might have made it go, (they still didn't stop) but it would never have made it pretty.

I found a cure for that issue ...................... the rear end of a vauxhall stopped mine quite well. :5bblush5:
I'd love a TR6 but they're a bit expensive. I just want a runaround for a bit of fun. On top of which the TR7 has loads of head and leg room , which is a rarity in 2 seaters.

Datatek · Nov 29, 2012

gold rover said:
I found a cure for that issue ...................... the rear end of a vauxhall stopped mine quite well. :5bblush5:
I'd love a TR6 but they're a bit expensive. I just want a runaround for a bit of fun. On top of which the TR7 has loads of head and leg room , which is a rarity in 2 seaters.

Pretty good head and leg room in the MR2 and if you can find a rot free one ultra reliable and probably the best handling/ride of any small sports car

Have to admit I'm biased

jwm · Nov 29, 2012

For a year or two this graced my driveway.

But then this arrived ...

You can just see the Jag wrapped up behind it.

Some months down the line, I was given the order that one of 'em had to go.

Guess which one was sold orf? ... I still shed a tear when I see it's picture on me shed wall.

Believe it or not, the Jag was thirstier than the Classic, but it wasn't faster.

Johnny.

big si · Nov 29, 2012

Datatek said:
Pretty good head and leg room in the MR2 and if you can find a rot free one ultra reliable and probably the best handling/ride of any small sports car Have to admit I'm biased

mk2 mr2's are an awsome little car i had this for a while.kinda miss it

Datatek · Nov 29, 2012

jwm said:
For a year or two this graced my driveway.

But then this arrived ...

You can just see the Jag wrapped up behind it.

Some months down the line, I was given the order that one of 'em had to go.

Guess which one was sold orf? ... I still shed a tear when I see it's picture on me shed wall.

Believe it or not, the Jag was thirstier than the Classic, but it wasn't faster.

Johnny.

I had the Daimler V8 version of the Mk2 Jag, IMO the V8 engine was better than the Jag straight six (even though I don't like V8's), pretty economical as I recall, 25mpg on a run

Took it to Africa with me, wiped the silencers off on a dirt road so fitted 2 straight lengths of pipe, sounded awesome

Never let me down.

gold rover · Nov 29, 2012

Datatek said:
Pretty good head and leg room in the MR2 and if you can find a rot free one ultra reliable and probably the best handling/ride of any small sports car Have to admit I'm biased

I do like the Mk2 MR2 but not as much as I like the TR7. I wish I had never used that Vauxhall instead of brakes

She was a lovely little car until I adjusted her looks

kevwill

Active Member

Datatek

Well-Known Member

kevwill

Active Member

Datatek

Well-Known Member

kevwill

Active Member

Datatek

Well-Known Member

gold rover

Well-Known Member

Datatek

Well-Known Member

jwm

Active Member

big si

Well-Known Member

Attachments

Datatek

Well-Known Member

gold rover

Well-Known Member

Similar threads