jamesmartin
Well-Known Member
less thermal shock
Balbas
Active Member
I'll qualify this by saying that I'm not an engineer, nor am I a mechanic.
If there is a thermostatically controlled fan (be it on a viscous coupling or electrically driven) drawing air through the radiator, and the rest of the cooling system is in good order, then where does the thermal shock come from? As I understand it:-
When engine starts to get hot
1) stat begins to open (doesn't just bang open fully - that would cause thermal shock) allowing water from the rad to be pumped around the block
2) fan starts to draw air through the rad, cooling the coolant.
No fan I've ever seen would cool the coolant sufficiently to refrigerate it.
Or am I missing the obvious?
Thinking about it, it's not just my old series 2 days which make me think it might be a good idea. I also have a Triumph Spitfire with a cooling system best described as 'marginal'. Accepted wisdom is to get rid of the engine driven fan and put a modern electric thermostatically controlled 2 speed fan on instead. And I used to commute on a Ducati with a marginal cooling system (and being Italian the wiring would catch fire if it got too hot!:lol
bikes have the added difficulty of tight packaging and small radiators combined with high power outputs for their capacity, co can get hot really quickly. Although it had an electric cooling fan, the fix was to use a different fan switch to get the fan started on the business of cooling things down sooner.I'm not hard against using a viscous fan, but I'm interested to know why some clearly intelligent and thoughtful posters think a viscous fan is the best answer. And if anyone tells me 'Landrover employed some very clever people and spent a lot of money specifying a viscous fan therefore it is the best' I'll point to the rear chassis rails and ask if the specified steel used to make those was also the best...
. I don't think I'm cleverer than an automotive engineer, but I do think that maybe as I am not constrained by cost to the same degree and that as I know more precisely the environmental conditions I am likely to find myself in that perhaps it is possible to rid myself of what could be seen as a compromise.
Last edited:
Balbas
Active Member
Further to my last, the switch in a viscous fan isn't controlled by the coolant temp, but by the air temp - as far as I can see it is in effect a bi-metallic strip controlling a simple fluid valve. I'm struggling to see how an electric fan controlled by a thermostatic switch in the coolant could be 'worse' (unless the switching temperature was wrong of course).
Still happy to be convinced by a compelling argument though.
Still happy to be convinced by a compelling argument though.
DIFFLOCK66
Well-Known Member
I'm not that knowledgeable, but the viscous fan seems to be spinning all the time, pulling some air through the rad and over the engine even if the coupling is barely engaged (ok wafting might be a better term!). A leccy fan does nothing until the thermostat triggers it, then wham! Full blow
However, suddenly dunking the Landy in cold water would generate thermal shock anyway wouldn't it?
However, suddenly dunking the Landy in cold water would generate thermal shock anyway wouldn't it?
discool
Well-Known Member
Where as the cooling of the rad is infinitely variable with a viscous coupled fan, an electric fan is either off or on but on only when the coolant temperature is higher than the normal running coolant temperature, Kenlowe suggests a setting of 5c above, that makes the engine bay worryingly hot before the fan cuts-in ...
That's my experience of course with a Kenlowe fan fitted to a 2ltr Ford 4 cylinder Pinto engine although so far I haven't had problems with the extra heat, then the fan only cuts in in traffic.
That's my experience of course with a Kenlowe fan fitted to a 2ltr Ford 4 cylinder Pinto engine although so far I haven't had problems with the extra heat, then the fan only cuts in in traffic.
discodrivercumbria
Well-Known Member
Oh really? Back when I had a series 2 (almost 20 years ago now
As a partial aside, I drove a 300tdi powered 110 around Kuwait and Iraq for a bit and it never once missed a beat. I had absolute confidence in that wagon even in near 60 degree centigrade heat. So I know the standard cooling systems are well up to the job and probably vastly over specified for the uk.
well you know the answer then, so you try it and do it, then put the result up here and ley us all know, but you bought the vehicle with out one, not us, so why no fan??? maybe they forgot to put it back on, maybe it's been up to it's windscreen in mud n water? you asked for peoples opinion and JM told you his, his is good enough for me!
Not just TD5s but applicable to virtually all Tdi with intercoolers.
You need the viscous fan to draw ambient through the intercooler and cool the intake temps, this is double edged, higher intake temps = higher combustion chamber temps, leading to hotter exhaust gasses, hotter exhaust gasses tend to reduce life span of turbos, head gaskets and life of the oil in the engine as the higher temps break it down faster.
You need the viscous fan to draw ambient through the intercooler and cool the intake temps, this is double edged, higher intake temps = higher combustion chamber temps, leading to hotter exhaust gasses, hotter exhaust gasses tend to reduce life span of turbos, head gaskets and life of the oil in the engine as the higher temps break it down faster.
Balbas
Active Member
Not having a pop, I don't do things just because someone says so. I want to know why they say so.
Balbas
Active Member
That does make some sense. And tilts me back towards putting a viscous fan on.
