A question for those who've "been there, done that, or seen it"...
First, the background:
Car:
- 127" Rapier, V8 removed and replaced with 200tdi (not by me)
- The radiator uses all the width of the front grill, 2 electrical fans
- An air-to-air intercooler (don't know where it came from, not LR) has been installed horizontally in the left corner by the bulkhead. Scoop was added on bonnet, directing whatever ram air there is through the intercooler. See pic.
Use:
1) (Main use) slow speed in the bush, puttering around in 1st gear
2) Commuting between places 3 to 6 hours away, on rutted tracks. Max speed 60 km/h
3) Carrying equipment in town. Traffic jams all the way, 60 km/h on a lucky run
Conditions:
- Temperature mild to medium (for African standards), 20C to 30C
- 1200m to 1500m above sea level all the time
My reasoning is that at very low speed, the intercooler doe not make much difference anyway.
In hot weather, at less than 30 km/h or thereabout, I'm pretty sure that there will be more heat transferred to the intercooler from the engine and exhaust than any cooling from the ram air.
The snorkel gets cleaner and cooler air than whatever is available under the bonnet in normal circumstances.
There are lengths of hoses and pipes, and a number of corners or bends that would be eliminated if I connected the turbo directly to the manifold.
Plus, the scoop on the bonnet really sucks...
So, I'm thinking that to just remove the contraption would not make any noticeable difference for the type of use and environment in which the car operates. I may even gain some at low revs (better flow).
And it would be tidier under and above the bonnet.
Any good solid common-sense input?
Thanks!
Philip
First, the background:
Car:
- 127" Rapier, V8 removed and replaced with 200tdi (not by me)
- The radiator uses all the width of the front grill, 2 electrical fans
- An air-to-air intercooler (don't know where it came from, not LR) has been installed horizontally in the left corner by the bulkhead. Scoop was added on bonnet, directing whatever ram air there is through the intercooler. See pic.
Use:
1) (Main use) slow speed in the bush, puttering around in 1st gear
2) Commuting between places 3 to 6 hours away, on rutted tracks. Max speed 60 km/h
3) Carrying equipment in town. Traffic jams all the way, 60 km/h on a lucky run
Conditions:
- Temperature mild to medium (for African standards), 20C to 30C
- 1200m to 1500m above sea level all the time
My reasoning is that at very low speed, the intercooler doe not make much difference anyway.
In hot weather, at less than 30 km/h or thereabout, I'm pretty sure that there will be more heat transferred to the intercooler from the engine and exhaust than any cooling from the ram air.
The snorkel gets cleaner and cooler air than whatever is available under the bonnet in normal circumstances.
There are lengths of hoses and pipes, and a number of corners or bends that would be eliminated if I connected the turbo directly to the manifold.
Plus, the scoop on the bonnet really sucks...
So, I'm thinking that to just remove the contraption would not make any noticeable difference for the type of use and environment in which the car operates. I may even gain some at low revs (better flow).
And it would be tidier under and above the bonnet.
Any good solid common-sense input?
Thanks!
Philip
Last edited: