But we can all atest.....we certainly wouldn't be without them....I for one was lost when my '93 Classic was stolen and wrecked in January this year....

Siff Upper Lip Ol' Bean, could be worse....you could be someone who believes the effect of a cornering RR will effect the outflow trajectory of the blowers....
 
ok fair enough, i know nothing. air has no mass and therefore not subject to newtons first law. obviously in our wonderful virtual arena i can't recreate the effect described but i can quite consistently reproduce it in the real world and its not dependent on brand or type of car i am driving. and i'd really like to learn. so please someone who knows better, can you explain the shifting draught of conditioned air (cool or hot depending on season) that correlates but perhaps is not caused when the car seems to turn sharply, say taking a corner or indeed a mini roundabout at >30kph or so?
 
But we can all atest.....we certainly wouldn't be without them....I for one was lost when my '93 Classic was stolen and wrecked in January this year....

Siff Upper Lip Ol' Bean, could be worse....you could be someone who believes the effect of a cornering RR will effect the outflow trajectory of the blowers....
Of course, it could be clockwise or anti-clockwise. It's all dependent upon the hemisphere in which the driver is occupying.

Sorry of your loss on the '93. Mine's grown on me and so far I choose to not have it removed.
 
Air has plenty of mass, tons and tons of it actually (depending on prevailing density).

I am so very sorry to report that in no way, no chance and no possibility can the effect of a turning RR or any vehicle designed for road use, turn with such speed as to affect the trajectory of the blown airflow.

IJust to clarify my position - my day job is to design parts of Gas Turbine Engines, I spent a good number of years (and plenth of my parents money) at College and University studying Aeronautical and Areospace Design Engineering which included among many modules, Thermodynamics and Aerodynamics.

When I went on to my Masters, I choose to specialise in Propulsion Technology, which is centred around Thermodynamics, Thermofluids and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

I spent a long time watch and learning airflow patterns, predicting Aerodynamic conclusions and understanding the principles of motion and flow.

I do not wish to undermine your results but I am affraid there is no way on earth (or space for that matter) that a cornering vehicle can give the results you indicate, could it be that when corenering, your natural body position will shift to rebalance yourself in the seat (due to your famous inertia) and place you closer to an air vent hence why you feel a change in percieved air temperature...??
 
lol....

Any good pilot will tell you the most important part of an aircraft is not the wings, landing gear, the flight controls or even (God forbid) the Engines....

It is the coffee machine, it is considered part of the Aircrafts MEL by most pilots (Minimum Equipment List - the list of working system required as an absolute minimum before the aircraft is fit to fly)

I am sure if I reffered to the parts we develope as fit for a coffee machine, I would be out on my ear pretty dam sharpish
 
lol....

Any good pilot will tell you the most important part of an aircraft is not the wings, landing gear, the flight controls or even (God forbid) the Engines....

It is the coffee machine, it is considered part of the Aircrafts MEL by most pilots (Minimum Equipment List - the list of working system required as an absolute minimum before the aircraft is fit to fly)

I am sure if I reffered to the parts we develope as fit for a coffee machine, I would be out on my ear pretty dam sharpish
We'll keep it to ourselves then.
 
Can we take it from this the coffee machine out of order would not be considered an AD on the checklist?
 
Whilst most pilots consider a non functioning coffee machine should be considered on the Airworthiness Directive Compliance List as to them it is one of the most crucial subsystems onboard, most Engineers and Technicians would rather stick the broken coffee machine up areas pilots generally fly with.....!!
 
Whilst most pilots consider a non functioning coffee machine should be considered on the Airworthiness Directive Compliance List as to them it is one of the most crucial subsystems onboard, most Engineers and Technicians would rather stick the broken coffee machine up areas pilots generally fly with.....!!


:hysterically_laughi:hysterically_laughi I meant Acceptable defect.
 
well inertia is famous but it ain't mine. :)

am intrigued now, feel that this is a windmill i shall continue quixotically to tilt at. maybe it is me swaying into the wind.. let me see if i can figure out a way to test this visually.
 
well inertia is famous but it ain't mine. :)

am intrigued now, feel that this is a windmill i shall continue quixotically to tilt at. maybe it is me swaying into the wind.. let me see if i can figure out a way to test this visually.

To be honest Rash think your on a loser mate. :):):)
 
Strange thing is, after reading all the aforesaid, the so-and-so-ing thing still gives me a blast of cool air when I turn right on a round about or when leaving a T junction....
 
well inertia is famous but it ain't mine. :)

am intrigued now, feel that this is a windmill i shall continue quixotically to tilt at. maybe it is me swaying into the wind.. let me see if i can figure out a way to test this visually.


Smoking a joint helps:D.
 
Well i'm sir Isaac Newtons PA and he says bollocks... (direct quote from him... honest)
 

Similar threads