Extreedoc
Well-Known Member
I used to do regular 100 mile plus trips in my old 2a petrol SWB towing a big four wheel Ifor Williams trailer, not comfortable but doable. Now I prefer diesel but not the old 2.25. My series 3 109 now has a 200Di engine. I would love to do a long trip in it but the missus won't hear of it.
Turboman
Mab An Gov
In about 1988, I blew a head gasket in my Perkins engined 109, in Birmingham.
I went back to Surrey on the train, picked up the bosses 109 diesel and an Ifor twin axle with ramps.
Drove back to Brum, limped my motor up on the trailer, and towed the whole rig back to Surrey for repairs.
No worries, they are good vehicles if looked after.
I passed my driving test in our petrol IIA - ( we've still got it, but it needs a nut and bolt resto 
- but this is on my list....) Then we got a III diesel.
If you want an original engine, then, IME, the petrol is the nicer engine - IIRC, 68 BHP as opposed to 54 out of the oil burner. As most everyone has said, the petrol is far more relaxed, much quieter, and has a sort "sewing machine" quality ticking over...
I wouldn't consider a 2 1/4 diesel...
Of course, there are many modern engines which warrant consideration, none of which are for me - I've always thought a rover V8 and an auto would be nice in a series - but probably pretty heavy on fuel .....
- but this is on my list....) Then we got a III diesel.If you want an original engine, then, IME, the petrol is the nicer engine - IIRC, 68 BHP as opposed to 54 out of the oil burner. As most everyone has said, the petrol is far more relaxed, much quieter, and has a sort "sewing machine" quality ticking over
...I wouldn't consider a 2 1/4 diesel...
Of course, there are many modern engines which warrant consideration, none of which are for me - I've always thought a rover V8 and an auto would be nice in a series - but probably pretty heavy on fuel
.....
Turboman
Mab An Gov
Of course, there are many modern engines which warrant consideration, none of which are for me - I've always thought a rover V8 and an auto would be nice in a series - but probably pretty heavy on fuel
3.9 V8 with a decent autobox, in a light series, should be pretty economical if you didn't boot it too much. And you probably wouldn't need to!
cornish rattler
Well-Known Member
Tdi's are good as you don't have to change down as much on twisty country lanes as you have plenty of power
Land Raver
Well-Known Member
Back to the original post, back when I bought mine 6 or so year ago, I recall I possibly had a slight preference for a petrol variant but decided that I would choose a vehicle based on chassis, bulkhead engine and gearbox condition. If I was in the market for another, I would do the same. A later 5 bearing engine is also a consideration too, petrol or diesel.
3.9 V8 with a decent autobox, in a light series, should be pretty economical if you didn't boot it too much. And you probably wouldn't need to!
Ah, well, yes.... doubt I could resist giving such a vehicle a few beans now and again
which probably means lots of beans, and quite often
Turboman
Mab An Gov
Ah, well, yes.... doubt I could resist giving such a vehicle a few beans now and again
which probably means lots of beans, and quite often
If you wanted to do that, it would be worthwhile uprating some of the drive train components, and the brakes, and the tyres as well.
Turboman
Mab An Gov
Modded old landrovers tend to be toys, and the owners for the most part will have an economical daily drive as well. Personally, if I had such a vehicle, and was doing sub 5k a year, I would just take the hit on the cost of petrol rather than messing around with LPG.
There isn't much room in an old landrover anywhere.
V8 and autobox was an option on Ninety and One Tens. AFAIK it was abandoned on Defenders, because diesel was all the rage at the time, an the 200Tdi and subsequent engines were efficient.
It may be that V8 petrol was retained as an option on the military vehicles, I have never had much to do with them.
cborrman
Active Member
nobody has mentioned so far the fumes, I can live with old diesel fumes, as in the end its just smoke, but tend to admire classic cars from a distance as the smell from the old petrol engines is gag reflex territory, is that the same with the series or is it because the other petrol classics you see today tend to be bigger engined performance petrols, like old v8, v12 4+ litre engines?
Colthebrummie
Well-Known Member
I don't get any petrol fumes in my 109 but I do get some exhaust gas comming in from the engine bay. For the life of me, I can't find where the leak is. The very first landy I drove was a diesel with a tractor type exhaust pipe that stuck up near the windscreen pillar. When waiting at traffic lights and Junctions, the cab would fill with fumes, it also stank of diesel. How my mate drove it every day is a mystery. It put me off owning a diesel so I now have a petrol 2.25. If I had to change the engine, I'd be looking for a v8. My biggest issue with the series is the high seating position, I struggle to see out of the windscreen cos I'm tall.
Col
Exhaust from an old diesel is much worse for you than petrol exhaust.
I'd much rather have to smell a petrol exhaust, given the choice, if it's a healthy engine.
Personally the exhaust from a modern diesel is gag worthy, horrid stuff, smells acidic to me.
I'd have a series petrol over a series diesel any day, much more refined
flat
Well-Known Member
wasn’t that a marketing decision so the defender didn’t ‘out perform’ the Range Rover in power stakes - I.e you want a v8, buy a range
wireman
Well-Known Member
A good 2.25 diesel can perform ok, but it's finding one. Most series diesels were working vehicles that were, well, worked. I drove a sw b to Anglesey once it had 235/85r16 tyres on and stll wanted to pull more, an overdrive would have worked great on it. I have a Lightweight with a 2.25 petrol in it and it's great for blasting about locally. You could get a Series with a knackered diesel in it and fit a 2.5 n/a from an early 90/110, a bit more power and not as noisy as a tdi.
