I agree. I was a mix of gobsmacked and furious, when I found out that they were being kept on. It's bad enough driving a car drunk. However, knowingly giving a convicted drink driver , the control of a bus, is beyond me.
When it first happened and they were shunting buses, I thought well, it only affects the company. However, to pass them one morning, driving the school bus and realise they were back driving the public , really shocked me.
The worst bit is , it hasn't stopped the drinking. Nor, the stupid attitude of , getting drunk as a skunk, but thinking it's ok, because they don't have a drink after midnight! What can you do, if Stagecoach don't care.
That old saying of, 12hrs between bottle and throttle wrong, after a heavy session I give it 24hrs.
 
That old saying of, 12hrs between bottle and throttle wrong, after a heavy session I give it 24hrs.

I've actually never heard that one. As for the person in question it was more like 6hrs between last drink and getting behind the wheel.
I've caught out many a person halfway through the next day, who have thought they were ok to drive. When you stop is immaterial, how much has been consumed, the proof, the metabolism of the person and various other factors , all come into play.
 
Professional drivers should be randomly breath tested by the employer before the start of a shift.

Col
A lot of PSV's over here cannot be started until the driver has blown into an inbuilt breathalyser. Doesn't stop someone cheating though.
 
+100%
No drink after midnight another bar room myth :mad:
No matter how many times you tell them. there are those, out there, who either just wont listen or will keep believing old wives tales, over fact.
You can only hope they get caught , before injuring or killing themselves or someone else. The themselves, I don't care about, as long as it's not too messy for the attending.
 
Yeah too right Gold rover, have had to do too many of those silly o’clock door nocks to have the wife or mum collapse in my arms and then to compound matters when I told them they couldn’t see loved one, one of the hardest jobs in the world trying to tell them to remember them as they were, not like something from a butchers block.
This part of traffic legislation is where zero tolerance rules and in my humble opinion limit should be ZERO !!!
 
Checkout the height of the bridge sign 13ft 3in something wrong there that truck unloaded is 13ft 3in
I suspect it's computer error, compounded by the driver relying too much on technology, as many now do. It's similar to the idiots who drive into rivers " because the sat nav told them to".
All the gadgets in the world , can't replace common sense
 
He should have a map with all the bridges on main A roads but they don't cover the small rds there's to many I think he kept his job at least nobody got hurt
 
Checkout the height of the bridge sign 13ft 3in something wrong there that truck unloaded is 13ft 3in

So laden it should have been lower, but maybe the road had been resurfaced (more than once even) since the bridge sign was installed?
I hit a bridge whilst transporting a large digging machine on a low-loader years ago, no way to measure the machine's boom height & to cap it all the bridge clearance wasn't displayed. No action taken against me by my employer or the police (who attended) but you never forget the experience.
 
He can't be lower with a car up on the cab 13ft 3 is the height of the post above the cab as bridge height not marked then it's over 16ft 6in
 
I had same as you years ago picked up low loader trailer out of tilbury with a tank for the rigs on it and the Dutch forgot to incorporate the 3ft flange on top of it you couldn't even see it from the ground
 

Similar threads