ER1C
Well-Known Member
its ok for poeple to walk across farmers fields with there big knobbly hiking boots, but its not ok when its a vehicle going down a public right of way. I did about footpath erosion when i studied environmental science a few years ago. its the same thing. ramblers cause soil erosion where cars cant go up mountain paths and nature walks ect. groups like defra and such like even go as far as restricting access to places where walkers are causing too much footpath erosion, so there just as bad!
Heh, you are not helping the cause. Of course they do but what does that mean ? Thats like saying an argument for every household in the UK leaving their tap running is that Severn Trent have so many leaks in their pipes.
We all know a walking boot does less damage than a tyre.. and I dont think some of the key lanes have anywhere near enough walking boots to even show on a chart compared to tyres. Likes of Hadrians Wall however does suffer massively from erosion and hence they are spending a small fortune protecting it.
I agree with EViL on the quality of this poll so stuff it
I would be interested however in any genuine statistics on the amount of time and money 4x4 owners spend helping councils with waymarking, resurfacing etc vs walkers.
I could only guess its a massive amount more.