There is already an extended MOT life for cars over 30 years old in France, however it does come with some usage restrictions I believe.
Not as good as you might think. I have a 1955 car ( non landrover ) and that is already tax and mot exempt. When this ruling first came in quite a few of the classic car insurers decided not insure the car unless it had an mot. Which to be fair seems reasonable to me. A lot of people buying a car would want an mot as well. Personally I still mot my car for a bit of assurance and of course it doesn't matter so much if it fails as long as the car is still roadworthy. Just points out the next jobs to be done. Imagine some of the death traps some people shall be willing to drive. Buy a ****heap rusty mk3 escort with dodgy balljoints, leaking brake fluid, knackered bushes and worn shocks. Only one way thats going to end.
Agree with above, would mot just for peace of mind for myself. Even if it is mot exempt the police could still do you for been in charge of an unroadworthy worthy vehicle. Just like no tread on a vehicle with mot, so I don't see it as an expense to be saved on.
Not as good as you might think. I have a 1955 car ( non landrover ) and that is already tax and mot exempt. When this ruling first came in quite a few of the classic car insurers decided not insure the car unless it had an mot. Which to be fair seems reasonable to me. A lot of people buying a car would want an mot as well. Personally I still mot my car for a bit of assurance and of course it doesn't matter so much if it fails as long as the car is still roadworthy. Just points out the next jobs to be done. Imagine some of the death traps some people shall be willing to drive. Buy a ****heap rusty mk3 escort with dodgy balljoints, leaking brake fluid, knackered bushes and worn shocks. Only one way thats going to end.
Totally agree.Agree with above, would mot just for peace of mind for myself. Even if it is mot exempt the police could still do you for been in charge of an unroadworthy worthy vehicle. Just like no tread on a vehicle with mot, so I don't see it as an expense to be saved on.
While to most of us the dreaded MoT test is worse than a visit to the dentist,
Dunno about that .. I fail to see why 'most' people see the MOT as 'dreaded', surely it's just a confirmation that you're already driving something that's roadworthy and can have some extra comfort knowing others agree that it's roadworthy. Especially if you do your own maintenance.
If you dread it each time, maybe you'd be better not driving at all, 'cos dreading it is tantamount to saying it's not currently roadworthy.
Just my opinion, not meaning you personally .. I use the royal 'you' ..
+1 to that. I still get my 86 MR2 MOT'd even though the centre said no need and it does few miles. However our MOT is every 2 years.Dunno about that .. I fail to see why 'most' people see the MOT as 'dreaded', surely it's just a confirmation that you're already driving something that's roadworthy and can have some extra comfort knowing others agree that it's roadworthy. Especially if you do your own maintenance.
If you dread it each time, maybe you'd be better not driving at all, 'cos dreading it is tantamount to saying it's not currently roadworthy.
Just my opinion, not meaning you personally .. I use the royal 'you' ..
+1 to that. I still get my 86 MR2 MOT'd even though the centre said no need and it does few miles. However our MOT is every 2 years.