I already spent a month researching this idea before I asked the question here.

So what did you find out in a month? Not much by the sounds of it, if you needed to be told the speedo runs off the wheel speed sensor/s

The torque converter not locking up was one thing that I did not think of.

But I will be able to see that with my OBD reader on my first test drive of the set up.

Why wait, plug it in now and see what you can see with your reader. Then at least you will know if it is possible to monitor.

Therefore while you have not specifically said a particular RPM that I would be driving at, you have continued to imply in a hysterical way that I would suffer problems that would only exist at around 500 RPM.

I have at no point implied any RPM or speed, I focus on the physical fit side of the question.
I suppose I did mention it was a big ratio change at the beginning to be fair, but you then pointed out you had such a mechanical knowledge I thought "well this guy understands"

I did learn that the L322 runs the speedo from the ABS system, from RRPhil on another forum and I thanked him for that important information.

You also learnt it here on the same day from the guy you are now calling an idiot.

But if the differentials are really difficult to install or they don't fit or there is some other problem

I would have thought that after researching for a month you would have got the technical manual that would explain the process.
I have already said I dont see why they wont fit even down to the fact the O ring seal behind the front diff is the same, but that some bolt lengths are different. But driveshafts may or maynot be the same. of course I did find the info I provided to you in less than a month.
I answered questions in the beginning

Technically no, you answered some yes. I dont think you answered any of mine with anything but disdain.

But of course google chat bot gives all your answers as has been seen many times here. Myself I prefer a technical manual, or others experience. But you wont even take that even though you are asking for it.

You have a Range Rover, much to your disgust it has many ECUs for things. My 1996 Range rover is the same (decades old we say) it too runs its speedo off the wheel speed sensors.
Your post about the output shaft sensor, Was this autobox related? Because yes, yet again I pointed out to you that they have 2 input & output, but I believe that they are only used for the gearbox ECU for shifts and TC lockup.
Some are refered to as "road speed" sensor some just "output shaft speed" They are called many different names.
I dont have enough knowledge to argue eaxactly what they do. But you had better hope that yours does not use that sensor with the wheel speed sensor as a coralation for the speedo as it will likely throw a hissy fit.


I will leave you to your google expert.

Have a nice time laughing at my post like you will. but if you want to ask about anything technical I am all ears.
Have a great day :).

J
 
One of my cars is 31 years old, no gearbox drive to the speedo. The fact remains, you lack detailed knowledge about your car.
OMG!!!

The whole reason for coming here and asking the initial question was because I lacked detailed knowledge about my car.

I came here to get that detailed knowledge, and I got it, so now I have it.
 
So what did you find out in a month? Not much by the sounds of it, if you needed to be told the speedo runs off the wheel speed sensor/s



Why wait, plug it in now and see what you can see with your reader. Then at least you will know if it is possible to monitor.



I have at no point implied any RPM or speed, I focus on the physical fit side of the question.
I suppose I did mention it was a big ratio change at the beginning to be fair, but you then pointed out you had such a mechanical knowledge I thought "well this guy understands"



You also learnt it here on the same day from the guy you are now calling an idiot.



I would have thought that after researching for a month you would have got the technical manual that would explain the process.
I have already said I dont see why they wont fit even down to the fact the O ring seal behind the front diff is the same, but that some bolt lengths are different. But driveshafts may or maynot be the same. of course I did find the info I provided to you in less than a month.


Technically no, you answered some yes. I dont think you answered any of mine with anything but disdain.

But of course google chat bot gives all your answers as has been seen many times here. Myself I prefer a technical manual, or others experience. But you wont even take that even though you are asking for it.

You have a Range Rover, much to your disgust it has many ECUs for things. My 1996 Range rover is the same (decades old we say) it too runs its speedo off the wheel speed sensors.
Your post about the output shaft sensor, Was this autobox related? Because yes, yet again I pointed out to you that they have 2 input & output, but I believe that they are only used for the gearbox ECU for shifts and TC lockup.
Some are refered to as "road speed" sensor some just "output shaft speed" They are called many different names.
I dont have enough knowledge to argue eaxactly what they do. But you had better hope that yours does not use that sensor with the wheel speed sensor as a coralation for the speedo as it will likely throw a hissy fit.


I will leave you to your google expert.

Have a nice time laughing at my post like you will. but if you want to ask about anything technical I am all ears.
Have a great day :).

J
I got the ABS speedo answer from RRPhil on another forum before you commented.

I got the answer to my initial question within a few days (from this forum and another), being that there is no obvious reason why it will definitely not work, and the other differential is most likely going to fit.

I never asked if it would definitely work, I asked if it was a crazy idea, meaning if it would definitely not work, but you probably don't understand the difference.
 
i cant shout too much i changed mine
One of the major jokes here is that people here claim that my idea cannot work because Range Rover made the perfect car that should never be modified.

Yet many people modify their cars to suit their personal needs and preferences, with a huge aftermarket accessories industry existing for this purpose, including for Range Rovers.

No car manufacturer makes a car for one specific person, they make cars for a general purpose and try to satisfy as many people as possible at a basic level to sell more cars.

This is the most basic childish pathetic loser response to my idea: "You cannot change your differentials because Range Rover already decided the perfect differential ratio for every possible use situation."

But here we are, almost 30 pages long, and people are still repeating the same lie.

"You are not allowed to change your car because it is already perfect."

What a bunch of losers.

But laughing at them is still funny after 29 pages, which is the biggest surprise to me.

When I posted my question I expected losers to come here and attack me, so it was not a surprise to me when it happened.

I had planned to ignore them and leave as soon as I got the answer to my question.

What surprised me is how funny it was, and how interacting with them was so hilarious.

But the longevity of the comedy of their stupidity has been the greatest surprise to me, as I expected the comedy of it to run out after a few days.

Every day some idiot who was wrong 20 times before tries another gotcha question to catch me out, and they are wrong again.

At what point does someone stop banging their head against the wall?

It seems the answer is never?
 
still putting more stress on it, which ever box it is
The ZF5HP24 is a robust gearbox without any major known issues, and is not the weak point of my system, so I do not care if it is put under slightly more stress.

So once again the hysterical problem that I have been told to worry about does not relate to my specific situation so I am ignoring it.

Hysterical answers that do not relate to my situation are just a waste of my time, yet all but one person here has done that, over and over and over again...
 
Last edited:
As always you lack details, It wasnt me and it was made the same day.

You also skip over lots of other stuff.

J
Phil was first, see the image.

But who cares?

Yeah sorry I confuse all of you idiots for each other so you did not contribute anything.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0728.jpeg
    IMG_0728.jpeg
    266.4 KB · Views: 1
You have said so many dumb things and insulting things since then that I don't think you can claim to have answered my question.

Yeah sorry I confuse all of you idiots for each other so you did not contribute anything

Your pretty quick on the edit button too :rolleyes:.

Either way I think for the complete story you should have included this


But then details are not your thing are they?

I think you have been the 1 insulting me actually, but I understand thats another minor detail.

J
 
Your pretty quick on the edit button too :rolleyes:.

Either way I think for the complete story you should have included this


But then details are not your thing are they?

I think you have been the 1 insulting me actually, but I understand thats another minor detail.

J
I edited it because I realized I had misread your comment, still thinking that you were the other idiot.

My edit correctly responded to your comment and acknowledged that I was wrong.

I don't spend much time reading the insults and gotcha questions and I respond very quickly using voice dictation without really thinking about my answers in detail.

The point is that you guys are still attacking me after 30 pages because I didn't agree with your stupid irrelevant hysterical ideas.

I see by your link that the other guy said the ABS thing on the same day but Phil was first and I read his post first.

But if you want to argue the point then two comments out of the 30 pages of comments were useful.

If half of the 590 comments here were from me, and half from you guys then that is 293 dumb comments and 2 good comments.

I don't care about this discussion, I just respond here because it's hilarious to see that you guys cannot let this chat go.

None of you have worked out that there was only one valuable comment here by Blob and one from the other guy, and the rest has been patronizing condescending attacks against me that have all been proven to be completely wrong and stupid.

Yet you guys have gone 30 pages deep literally just repeating this same ideas hoping that if you attack me enough the previous 29 pages will just vanish and you guys will all be correct and I will be the one who is wrong.

You think that if the score is 1/60 for wins versus losses then you guys won.

That is the most hilarious thing.
 
Last edited:
Your pretty quick on the edit button too :rolleyes:.

Either way I think for the complete story you should have included this


But then details are not your thing are they?

I think you have been the 1 insulting me actually, but I understand thats another minor detail.

J
I just want to make one thing clear, my interactions here are like me talking to an annoying child that wants a cookie.

I'm not devoting any significant amount of mental energy to my responses, and I do not read your comments in any detail.

I don't even pay any attention who is actually commenting or think about their past comments.

I am just responding because it is funny that you guys continue to try to prove that I am an idiot, whilst proving that you guys are idiots.

You don't just prove that you guys are idiots in each individual comment which I can prove wrong without applying more than 5% of my mental capacity.

You guys also prove that you are idiots because you are continuing to try to prove that I am an idiot after having been wrong so many times already.

It is not only funny that you guys have been wrong maybe 0/60, it is funny that you guys keep coming back hoping to be right the next time, ignoring your win lose ratio.

That is why I keep interacting here, to see how desperate you guys are.

Will we get to 60 pages and to a 0/100 ratio of failed gotcha questions?

How deep do you idiots want to go with this?

And the biggest joke of these 30 pages is that the only way to prove that I am the idiot would be to have 30 pages of successful gotcha questions, just to be even, then another 30 pages of successful gotcha questions, so another 60 pages.

But you guys cannot even get 1 gotcha question right, let alone 60 pages of them.

Like the latest attack that I must be an idiot because I did not know that the L322 uses the ABS ring for its speedo and not the gearbox output shaft RPM.

Apparently I should've known this because most modern cars do this, even though my car is 23 years old and not a modern car!

You cannot make this sh!t up.

You guys are like a football team that is losing a match 0 / 10 who believes that if they can just score the next goal then they will win the match.

No, then the score will be 1/10 against you.

That is why you guys are so funny.
 
Last edited:
I hereby sentence this thread to "no notifications" and it's author to "ignore".

So long sucker and may your diffs melt the rest of your RR! 🤣 🤣 🤣
Weren't you the guy who 20 pages ago told everyone else to stop commenting here and then you kept commenting here?

Weren't you the guy who said he was turning off his notifications 10 pages ago?

I don't remember if it was you, because all you losers seem the same to me, and I can't be bothered checking because I don't care, but I think it was you.
 
i think your trying to convince your self not us
I'm not trying to convince myself of anything, I am just laughing at idiots.

Like this idiot Stanley that thinks that my alternative differentials will melt when running in a car with less torque and horsepower than the car that they were designed for.

After 30 pages that is the best that he has to throw at me, and you think that I am the one trying to convince myself of something?
 

Similar threads