D
D Walford
Guest
drystone@swiftdsl.com.au wrote:
> Albm&ctd wrote:
>
>>In article <e66g4l$lvk$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, embtwo@gmail.com says...
>>
>>
>>>money in getting a reputable mechanic to have a regular look
>>>under/around the vehicle at items that are not normally part of routine
>>>servicing.
>>>
>>
>>That *IS* part of regular servicing by dealers and dealers do have a
>>problem with the wage they pay to competent mechanics.
>>
>>Al
>>--
>>I don't take sides.
>>It's more fun to insult everyone.
>>http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
>
>
> Land Rover have taken responsibility, and although they've acknowledged
> they do not check these bolts when servicing, one could infer they
> should have. Otherwise they'd treat the matter like a punctured
> tyre--owner's responsibility.
>
Good result.
How much yelling was needed to get them to cooperate?
Daryl
> Albm&ctd wrote:
>
>>In article <e66g4l$lvk$1@lust.ihug.co.nz>, embtwo@gmail.com says...
>>
>>
>>>money in getting a reputable mechanic to have a regular look
>>>under/around the vehicle at items that are not normally part of routine
>>>servicing.
>>>
>>
>>That *IS* part of regular servicing by dealers and dealers do have a
>>problem with the wage they pay to competent mechanics.
>>
>>Al
>>--
>>I don't take sides.
>>It's more fun to insult everyone.
>>http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
>
>
> Land Rover have taken responsibility, and although they've acknowledged
> they do not check these bolts when servicing, one could infer they
> should have. Otherwise they'd treat the matter like a punctured
> tyre--owner's responsibility.
>
Good result.
How much yelling was needed to get them to cooperate?
Daryl
