I've fallen of over that edge again, I should really keep off ebay. I've bid
on another silly motor but then I saw item #4584582323 I thought hmmmm nice
for a project shame its so far away then I saw the number plate does that
count as a desirable plate or not
Derek

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 22:17:27 GMT, "Derek"
<del.wattsspamnoman@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>I've fallen of over that edge again, I should really keep off ebay. I've bid
>on another silly motor but then I saw item #4584582323 I thought hmmmm nice
>for a project shame its so far away then I saw the number plate does that
>count as a desirable plate or not
>Derek
>
That is a great number plate for a landy!

hehe if you mean is it a cherished/private plate?, not unless the vehicle is newer than a 'C' reg (1986) and the plate was moved onto it at a later date, but looking at the year of the car in the description, it hasnt. but you could pretend it is

Suffix Letters (OLD Format)
A 01 February 1963 31 December 1963
B 01 January 1964 31 December 1964
C 01 January 1965 31 December 1965
D 01 January 1966 31 December 1966
E 01 January 1967 31 July 1967
F 01 August 1967 31 July 1968
G 01 August 1968 31 July 1969
H 01 August 1969 31 July 1970
J 01 August 1970 31 July 1971
K 01 August 1971 31 July 1972
L 01 August 1972 31 July 1973
M 01 August 1973 31 July 1974
N 01 August 1974 31 July 1975
P 01 August 1975 31 July 1976
R 01 August 1976 31 July 1977
S 01 August 1977 31 July 1978
T 01 August 1978 31 July 1979
V 01 August 1979 31 July 1980
W 01 August 1980 31 July 1981
X 01 August 1981 31 July 1982
Y 01 August 1982 31 July 1983
Prefix Letters
A 01 August 1983 31 July 1984
B 01 August 1984 31 July 1985
C 01 August 1985 31 July 1986
D 01 August 1986 31 July 1987
E 01 August 1987 31 July 1988
F 01 August 1988 31 July 1989
G 01 August 1989 31 July 1990
H 01 August 1990 31 July 1991
J 01 August 1991 31 July 1992
K 01 August 1992 31 July 1993
L 01 August 1993 31 July 1994
M 01 August 1994 31 July 1995
N 01 August 1995 31 July 1996
P 01 August 1996 31 July 1997
R 01 August 1997 31 July 1998
S 01 August 1998 28 February 1999
T 01 March 1999 31 July 1999
V 01 August 1999 28 February 2000
W 01 March 2000 31 July 2000
X 01 August 2000 28 February 2001
Y 01 March 2001 31 July 2001

NEW format
Year March September
2001 51
2002 02 52
2003 03 53
2004 04 54
2005 05 55
2006 06 56
2007 07 57
2008 08 58
2009 09 59
2010 10 60
2011 11 61
2012 12 62
2013 13 63
2014 14 64
2015 15 65
2016 16 66
2017 17 67
2018 18 68
2019 19 69
2020 20 70
2021 21 71
2022 22 72
2023 23 73
2024 24 74
2025 25 75
2026 26 76
2027 27 77
2028 28 78
2029 29 79
2030 30 80
2031 31 81
2032 32 82
2033 33 83
2034 34 84
2035 35 85
2036 36 86
2037 37 87
2038 38 88
2039 39 89
2040 40 90
2041 41 91
2042 42 92
2043 43 93
2044 44 94
2045 45 95
2046 46 96
2047 47 97
2048 48 98
2049 49 99

"Derek" <del.wattsspamnoman@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:XZT6f.8420$S_1.7091@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
> I've fallen of over that edge again, I should really keep off ebay. I've
> bid
> on another silly motor but then I saw item #4584582323 I thought hmmmm
> nice
> for a project shame its so far away then I saw the number plate does that
> count as a desirable plate or not
> Derek
>

I would steer clear of it...the seller has a "-1" feedback rating for
selling a similar vehicle! I think the numberplate is accurate!


--
--
Thanks,
Paul
--------------------
1992 RRC Vogue SE

On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:48:57 +0100, "Pacman" <p_a_cherry@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>I would steer clear of it...the seller has a "-1" feedback rating for
>selling a similar vehicle! I think the numberplate is accurate!

I wonder if the rear light failure is anything to do with the stated
intent to patch weld the chassis?

AJH

On or around Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:49:11 +0200, AJH <sylva@despammed.com>
enlightened us thusly:

>On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:48:57 +0100, "Pacman" <p_a_cherry@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>I would steer clear of it...the seller has a "-1" feedback rating for
>>selling a similar vehicle! I think the numberplate is accurate!
>
>I wonder if the rear light failure is anything to do with the stated
>intent to patch weld the chassis?

it's also had different plates fitted. Probably for an innocent reason. and
it's missing the number plate light, which is an MOT fail
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Appearances: You don't really need make-up. Celebrate your authentic
face by frightening people in the street.
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

On or around Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:48:57 +0100, "Pacman"
<p_a_cherry@hotmail.com> enlightened us thusly:

>
>"Derek" <del.wattsspamnoman@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>news:XZT6f.8420$S_1.7091@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
>> I've fallen of over that edge again, I should really keep off ebay. I've
>> bid
>> on another silly motor but then I saw item #4584582323 I thought hmmmm
>> nice
>> for a project shame its so far away then I saw the number plate does that
>> count as a desirable plate or not
>> Derek
>>
>
>I would steer clear of it...the seller has a "-1" feedback rating for
>selling a similar vehicle! I think the numberplate is accurate!

mind, if you read the description of the previous one she sold, it contained
enough clues that it was a heap, a bit of caveat emptor was required, I
reckon. I'd not have bought it, except perhaps for the tyres.

--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
Appearances: You don't really need make-up. Celebrate your authentic
face by frightening people in the street.
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

"Pacman" <p_a_cherry@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dji77g$vqj$1@domitilla.aioe.org...
>
> "Derek" <del.wattsspamnoman@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:XZT6f.8420$S_1.7091@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
> > I've fallen of over that edge again, I should really keep off ebay. I've
> > bid
> > on another silly motor but then I saw item #4584582323 I thought hmmmm
> > nice
> > for a project shame its so far away then I saw the number plate does
that
> > count as a desirable plate or not
> > Derek
> >
>
> I would steer clear of it...the seller has a "-1" feedback rating for
> selling a similar vehicle! I think the numberplate is accurate!
>
>
> --
> --
> Thanks,
> Paul
> --------------------
> 1992 RRC Vogue SE
>
worry ye not as I posted I am bidding elsewhere and should you check my
feedback (87) on ebay you will see I have been around a bit. I have bought a
couple of scoobies online and (touches head in lieu of wood ) no problems so
far although as I was taught at school caveat emptor ( passed commerce thank
you ) if I am at all suspicious I see and test drive first. I was bidding on
a rangerover disco hybrid last week but the insurance wallahs were not happy
so I had to drop out inconsistant engine .You just can't tell what I will
buy in the end I certainly don't know for sure.The oil has long gone from
my drive so it must be about time
Derek