RKServicing

Active Member

• Jul 20, 2013

• #1

https://www.facebook.com/topgear/posts/10153038254220571:0

I'm nt sure.... Bit gay.

 

RKServicing

Active Member

• Jul 20, 2013

• #2

Behold: a convertible Range Rover - BBC Top Gear

 

Paul D

Old, nackered 'n broke, but the Landy is fine . :)

Events Planner

• Jul 21, 2013

• #3

That roof wouldn't last two minutes down some lanes ...

 

Jay reKx

Active Member

• Jul 21, 2013

• #4

i'd quite fancy a ragtop D1 or RRC if it was done better than that.

the first FB pic I looked at and thought hmm ... maybe? but then I slapped myself. hard. It is just wrong. the colour of the roof is just wrong, the shape is just wrong, the whole thing is a big lump of wrong ... fair play for them trying something a bit different, but it really shoud be consigned to the fail pile. a folding hardtop convertible, on the other hand, might work

 

200tdi ayre

Well-Known Member

• Jul 21, 2013

• #5

Hell no !!!

 

Jongould

New Member

• Jul 21, 2013

• #6

complete fail, convertibles should be sleek and sexy, that just looks wrong, screams 'I got money but no taste!'

 

D90mitch

Well-Known Member

• Jul 21, 2013

• #7

eek keep the soft tops to the fenders ;o SUVs with soft roofs just look awful. Removable hardtop, perhaps but having to physically take the roof off wouldn't be very range rovery'

 

livers

Well-Known Member

• Jul 22, 2013

• #8

If Carlsberg converted range rovers, they would be called Crayfords.

 

milonic

Active Member

• Aug 23, 2013

• #9

That's one if the most hideous things I've ever seen.

They need to stop what they are doing and stop it NOW!!!

 

The Mad Hat Man

Well-Known Member

LZIR Despatch Agent

• Aug 23, 2013

• #10

I had a convertable Disco once

 

DIFFLOCK66

Well-Known Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #11

It's crap! It's still got the window frames on the door tops. A proper convertible should not have window frames. Once the roof's down the side glass and any trace of it should disappear. A WMIK has no side windows.. you get the idea

Diff.

 

E

ebbadger

Well-Known Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #12

DIFFLOCK66 said:

It's crap! It's still got the window frames on the door tops. A proper convertible should not have window frames. Once the roof's down the side glass and any trace of it should disappear. A WMIK has no side windows.. you get the idea

Diff.

Click to expand...

very true......

cheers Steve

 

DIFFLOCK66

Well-Known Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #13

Now that purple people eater looks right! If it ever rolls over, you're going to die, but hey, looking good can be risky

Diff.

 

trax99

Well-Known Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #14

Jongould said:

complete fail, convertibles should be sleek and sexy, that just looks wrong, screams 'I got money but no taste!'

Click to expand...

yes, true, but when did the majority of new rangie buyers ever have that.

 

D

disco300tdidom

New Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #15

:mil10::wtf:

 

gemsdad

NOT BOTHERED.

Full Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #16

RKServicing said:

https://www.facebook.com/topgear/posts/10153038254220571:0

I'm nt sure.... Bit gay.

Click to expand...

suits you sir.

 

Jay reKx

Active Member

• Aug 24, 2013

• #17

ebbadger said:

very true......

cheers Steve

Click to expand...

now that, on the other hand, does look good. any more pics?

 

E

ebbadger

Well-Known Member

• Aug 31, 2013

• #18

sorry , the build is here ,,, STEVES SITE

but it was before I really started my site so I didn't get all the pics / details I should ... oops

cheers steve

 

RKServicing

Active Member

• Sep 1, 2013

• #19

gemsdad said:

suits you sir.

Click to expand...

I think not GD!

 

gemsdad

NOT BOTHERED.

Full Member

• Sep 1, 2013

• #20

rkservicing said:

i think not gd!

Click to expand...

:d:d