Booger
New Member
Not asking about the lens, the sensor is what interests me.Pffff does that data tell you anything about the lens?? :doh:
you need to compare prints side by side not a small jpeg on landyzone
Why not ? I never make prints, I only ever email or post the pics online, and if you can't actually tell the difference in that environment, what is the point of spending 5K on a camera...
When are you gonna make a photography thread?
When my hello kitty cams arrive I'll post some pics in a new thread in anything goes
and that's right, I said cams, they are so cheap I'm getting two Also getting a 600mm (eqiv) lens so I can get pics of the fishing boats that sail past my window....I looked at that Ephemeris, right after I looked up Ephemeris in the fooking dictionary. To be honest I don't take those kind of pics anymore (the ones that need planning), I take the kind of pics where if I see something cool I take the camera out of my pocket, and take the picture.... This is why I don't want a 5D
landroverjack
New Member
Last time I checked you can get a 5D for under 5k And 1 5D is smaller than 2 Hello kitties... And I've already proven you can tell the difference even with a jpeg on landyzone..
How much longer does this pointless debate have to go on for? :hysterically_laughi
And 1 5D is smaller than 2 Hello kitties... And I've already proven you can tell the difference even with a jpeg on landyzone..How much longer does this pointless debate have to go on for? :hysterically_laughi
landroverjack
New Member
You found the thread then
:welcome2:Who would be daft enough to give you their address? ... oh wait :doh:
Booger
New Member
As long as you keep talking **** and come up with stupid points that make no sense
For instance, why would I have two of the same camera in my pocket at the same time :doh:
Booger
New Member
You have only proven you can read exif data, put your money where your mouth is, and tell me what cam took that last picture, the one you refuse to comment on... maybe you suspect I have edited the exif data
landroverjack
New Member
You have only proven you can read exif data, put your money where your mouth is, and tell me what cam took that last picture, the one you refuse to comment on... maybe you suspect I have edited the exif data
jcuk found the metadata not me
Apparently it was a DMC-HK3That is, Digital Media Camera - Hello Kitty mark 3
Booger
New Member
jcuk found the metadata not me
You are an idiot
, I edited the metadata , now tell me, just by looking at the pic, what type of cam took that pic.. ie 4/3 Micro 4/3 APS C, or full frame...
landroverjack
New Member
I was here all the time.. I don't spend my whole life posting in a thread for GREEN LANING the other side of the COUNTRY about PHOTOGRAPHY do I now?
I would be tempted to say APSC or 4/3rds but it really does depend on what has been done to it since it was taken, and also what settings it was taken with...
I would be tempted to say APSC or 4/3rds but it really does depend on what has been done to it since it was taken, and also what settings it was taken with...
landroverjack
New Member
Where have you gone Booger? Not looking for yet another picture taken with a hello kitty camera to post in here are you?
:hysterically_laughi
:hysterically_laughi
Booger
New Member
Here is a message for you from Jeremy Clarkson..
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdNYhmohCzk]Clarkson says Loser - YouTube[/ame]
It was taken with a medium format camera Just published - a quick Pentax 645D sample gallery: Digital Photography Review
and now that you have proven that when a pic is posted online or emailed, you can't really tell if it was taken with a high end medium format, or a hello kitty cam, this pointless discussion can end.
landroverjack
New Member
I was here all the time.. I don't spend my whole life posting in a thread for GREEN LANING the other side of the COUNTRY about PHOTOGRAPHY do I now?
I would be tempted to say APSC or 4/3rds but it really does depend on what has been done to it since it was taken, and also what settings it was taken with...
Ahem
landroverjack
New Member
Take a look at some of the comments...
Booger
New Member
Yes because someone who reviews cameras for a living is going to cock up the settings so badly that you cannot tell what kind of camera it is....
as for the comments, someone did a review, and someone from the hundreds who commented said the product was crap, and thats your argument, seriously....
so from now on, I'm not arguing with you anymore, because anyone who is not an idiot, can see I have won
Besides, I'm off to see your sister....
Last edited:
landroverjack
New Member
Its not so much a case of the wrong settings.. just the fact he discarded 99% of the original image
Oh and don't forget the 600mm strap on :lol::lol:
Oh and don't forget the 600mm strap on :lol::lol:
Booger
New Member
Its not so much a case of the wrong settings.. just the fact he discarded 99% of the original image
Oh and don't forget the 600mm strap on :lol::lol:
Who are you arguing with now ? I'm not arguing with you anymore..
and thanks for reminding me your sister has a strap on, now I can get your mamma over too
Last edited:
landroverjack
New Member
Booger had been tracking the SS Fat Guy all day on his live map and finally it came past his window at a racing speed of 0.001 knots
Booger
New Member
Booger had been tracking the SS Fat Guy all day on his live map and finally it came past his window at a racing speed of 0.001 knots
That's my dad, don't say anything rude about him...
