Generally, no. It's easier and simpler to just have one motor driving a diff. Tesla and Jaguar four-wheel drive EVs do use two motors, one for each axle. Tesla use different gear ratios for the front and rear motors so there is a bit of flexibility in shuffling power around to improve efficiency. But there's nothing to stop you doing four-wheel drive through an ordinary transfer box, and it gives you the same high/low range options.Aren't the modern ones EV driven from individual wheel motors via computers instead of one large motor.
I think you should look into how an electric car works.I wonder whether two forklift motors could be connected up to the transfer box- the second driving into the PTO output. Two motors working in tandem like that gives you a more respectable 60hp or so. Then cram in as many batteries as possible!
I think you should look into how an electric car works.
The motors need to drive the wheels direct, or as near direct as possible. There is not enough power to squander on the mechanical losses associated with gearboxes. And there is no need of gearboxes, or transfer boxes, as the motor produces the same torque throughout the rev range.
If Land Rover do something, that is usually a sign that it is worth avoiding!I know these things
You generally have maximum torque in the lower part of the rpm range, then torque drops off as speed increases when you hit the peak power range. On an ordinary car, one gear is indeed all you need. But that one gear is a compromise between low end starting torque and top speed. On a Landy, having low range is still an advantage as it gives a higher wheel torque when driving off road, without sacrificing top end. Land Rover themselves did this on their conversions. The main gearbox isn't normally needed though.