C

Clfno1

New Member
Looking to get back into a Range Rover after previously having a 54 reg 4.4V8 and was wondering what would be considered the safer, more logical option in terms of reliability and usability; late model L322 4.4TDV8 or an early L494 Range Rover Sport 3.0 SDV6? I looked at late model Discovery 4's as well but I have near enough talked myself out of that one!

Budget is up to around £27-30k, but obviously if the better option is cheaper then all the better!

Cheers guys
 
Clfno1 said:
Looking to get back into a Range Rover after previously having a 54 reg 4.4V8 and was wondering what would be considered the safer, more logical option in terms of reliability and usability; late model L322 4.4TDV8 or an early L494 Range Rover Sport 3.0 SDV6? I looked at late model Discovery 4's as well but I have near enough talked myself out of that one!

Budget is up to around £27-30k, but obviously if the better option is cheaper then all the better!

Cheers guys
Click to expand...
The V6 breaks cranks, the V8 eats turbo's. Hobsons choice.
 
For that sort of budget, my money would be going in a L494.

As much as I love the 322, the design is best part of 17 years old.....even the 494's are 7 years old now...
 
Clfno1 said:
Looking to get back into a Range Rover after previously having a 54 reg 4.4V8 and was wondering what would be considered the safer, more logical option in terms of reliability and usability; late model L322 4.4TDV8 or an early L494 Range Rover Sport 3.0 SDV6? I looked at late model Discovery 4's as well but I have near enough talked myself out of that one!

Budget is up to around £27-30k, but obviously if the better option is cheaper then all the better!

Cheers guys
Click to expand...
robhew86 said:
For that sort of budget, my money would be going in a L494.

As much as I love the 322, the design is best part of 17 years old.....even the 494's are 7 years old now...
Click to expand...

Why not the L405. They're selling 5yr old vehicles in that price range. A bit of haggling will either buy a 5yr old ( veh) for less money, or a if you're really good might bring a good 4yr old one into play.
 
gold rover said:
Why not the L405. They're selling 5yr old vehicles in that price range. A bit of haggling will either buy a 5yr old ( veh) for less money, or a if you're really good might bring a good 4yr old one into play.
Click to expand...

That has been mentioned and after looking I have seen a few 2014/15 models with the SDV8 engine within budget....

The choices get even more difficult, I think I like the Range Rover because it's a full fat version, and the 4.4 seemed to be a safer bet than the 3.0 in the Sport, although the newer car is quicker and more economical, but a L405 seems to be the best of both worlds...
 
gold rover said:
Why not the L405. They're selling 5yr old vehicles in that price range. A bit of haggling will either buy a 5yr old ( veh) for less money, or a if you're really good might bring a good 4yr old one into play.
Click to expand...

Sorry beg you pardon, got confused...:oops: I meant the L405 not the L494 RRS......wouldn't touch an RRS.
Full Fat L405 all the way for me... :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Swapping the Jaguar for a L322?
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
holidaychicken
holidaychicken
B
L series tuning guide
Replies
3
Views
13K
newcyboots
newcyboots
A
Advice
Replies
9
Views
1K
mmaddock
mmaddock
A
Hi
Replies
2
Views
707
Wesley Pegden
Wesley Pegden
K
Late TD300 or Early TD5 Disco?????
Replies
12
Views
6K
Austin Shackles
A