I agree with Dr. Jeremy Clarkson, electric cars are not the answer, the battery's production and final disposal are far more damaging to the planet. Electric cars just a passing fad. No recharging points in the woods either.
Firstly, if they say it'll have a 50 mile range, it'll probably be 35-40. Tops.
Secondly, it'll be a damned sight less once the batteries lose optimum efficiency (after a winter or two).
Thirdly, the cost of replacing all those batteries when they become gutless will probably write the vehicle off as well as creating a big stack of dead batteries - not exactly green then.
Fourthly, electric cars are a daft idea. I think the idea is being pushed and bankrolled by interested industry groups - battery and component producers etc.
Burn it.
I agree with Dr. Jeremy Clarkson, electric cars are not the answer, the battery's production and final disposal are far more damaging to the planet. Electric cars just a passing fad. No recharging points in the woods either.
I agree with Dr. Jeremy Clarkson, electric cars are not the answer, the battery's production and final disposal are far more damaging to the planet. Electric cars just a passing fad. No recharging points in the woods either.
you can get a portable charger for it,according to the article??
300v battery and water? Hmm. Mind you, fording a trout stream might have it's rewards....
I agreeI agree with Dr. Jeremy Clarkson, electric cars are not the answer, the battery's production and final disposal are far more damaging to the planet. Electric cars just a passing fad. No recharging points in the woods either.