discool

Well-Known Member
2016-11-11-20.59.33-759x500.jpg
2016-11-11-20.59.39-1024x576.jpg
 
Not in the UK but in one of the tunnels in Madeira, a 70 year old mail seriously injured
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4717.JPG
    IMG_4717.JPG
    62.7 KB · Views: 295
  • IMG_4718.JPG
    IMG_4718.JPG
    68.9 KB · Views: 270
I recall they did a range rover versus something like a Fiesta size modern car and the Range Rover came off far worse simply due to the fact it didn't have the crush zones so the bulkhead came backwards and sliced through the knees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8ha
Defender in the OP looks in surprisingly good shape.... Hope all goes well for the people. A
 
Modern vehicles are very strong, simply because they're designed to be. They are also good at absorbing impact energy throughout the whole body shell. This minimises the energy transferred to the occupants inside. So a modern vehicle looks like a complete mess after a hard impact, but it's designed to do that as energy is dissipated.
Something like a Defender or D1/2 has a sturdy chassis to keep the bumpers at the correct ends with all the other components bolted in the middle. However in a serious impact, that same chassis often deflects the impacted vehicle into softer non structural body shell components. This is one reason why the Defender was finally killed off, simply because it couldn't meet the stringent EU crash tests.
In light low speed crashes, the solid chassis vehicle normally suffers little more than cosmetic damage, whereas the modern vehicle is beyond economical repair.
 

Similar threads